Give me an example of a politician who takes money from foreign countries directly into their chequing accounts.
Trudeau harming relations between India and Canada?
- Thread starter canada-man
- Start date
Voila?
For one your article says that Mulroney possibly received payments between 93 and 94 after he stepped down.
For another, read my question again.
Give me an example of a time when a sitting prime minister received money directly into their chequing accounts from a foreign country.
Where did you state "sitting politician"? You keep on moving the goal posts all the time!!
However, the Airbus deal was done during Mulroney's tenure. If he received the money after he left office but was based on when he was involved in the airbus affair during his PM tenure!!
Airbus Affair
The Airbus Affair was a political scandal that began in the late 1980s and concluded around 2010. The scandal concerned the purchase of Airbus passenger aircraf...
www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca
So you have not proven that the money went directly to Justin Trudeau. Yet you deflect by answering a question by asking another question. So answer what I asked you in the first place!!
Of course you cannot prove it!!
Okay I said politician.Where did you state "sitting politician"? You keep on moving the goal posts all the time!!
However, the Airbus deal was done during Mulroney's tenure. If he received the money after he left office but was based on when he was involved in the airbus affair during his PM tenure!!
Airbus Affair
The Airbus Affair was a political scandal that began in the late 1980s and concluded around 2010. The scandal concerned the purchase of Airbus passenger aircraf...
So you have not proven that the money went directly to Justin Trudeau. Yet you deflect by answering a question by asking another question. So answer what I asked you in the first place!!
Of course you cannot prove it!!
Mulroney had stepped down.
Even then your example isn't relevant and you have failed.
Yes, you are.
You keep accusing Trudeau, May, Singh and the RCMP of lying.
If you're now saying they didn't lie than this is 34 pages of trolling.
I'm always amazed that people think governments are required to publicly release all their intelligence sources. Would people demand a lawyer release their entire case to the news before trials?
For us spectators, it comes down to a he said, she said between Canada and India and from what I have seen about India's political issues, I tend to trust Canada's intelligence more.
Once again making accusations as fact while criticizing others for not providing you the evidence.
They are not required to release evidence to the public.
They are required to act.
If they keep talking, it is just talk.
This applies to India too.
But I believe they have acted.
Trudeau has not.
I have not made any accusations.
Only stated facts that are already reported.
It is fact, that Trudeau made accusations without presenting evidence.
It is fact that he hasn't acted on the evidence he says he possesses.
It is fact that India has presented dossiers, extradition requests etc which are more decisive actions.
Last edited:
Sorry but bullshit. You openly accused Trudeau of taking bribes. Your attempt to trump it and claim "I'm just repeating what I've heard" is not helpful.
You do understand the idea of diplomatic immunity right? Not much that Canada could legally do other than expel the diplomats. Did you miss when that happened or do you think Trudeau should play superhero and go arrest the guy?
Stop lying.
I posted that he is implicated in cash for access scandals.
I posted a wiki article.
So excuses and "trust me bro".
Am sure he can arrest the criminal gangs they say India used here.
Am sure you understand that the high commissioner himself did not take a gun and go hunt Sikh separatists at night.
Mulroney was not a politician? It is very relevant. You just cannot accept the facts. Period!!
You are the one that failed as you did not answer my question in the first place!!
