Name changes happen all the time, how many names has the skydome had now?I don't disagree.
But I am neutral about this and I don't particularly care whether they change the name or not.
Its only the snowflakes that get triggered by inclusion.
Name changes happen all the time, how many names has the skydome had now?I don't disagree.
But I am neutral about this and I don't particularly care whether they change the name or not.
Yeah which is why I don't particularly care.Name changes happen all the time, how many names has the skydome had now?
Its only the snowflakes that get triggered by inclusion.
Mayor Chow has sburra on her face.I don't disagree.
But I am neutral about this and I don't particularly care whether they change the name or not.
You should care those are you're tax dollars that are being spent there.Yeah which is why I don't particularly care.
I am okay even if it is just a symbolic gesture.
LOL...The name of Skydome has been changed once since 1989 and Rogers communications owns the arena through a hundred year ground lease of government land.Name changes happen all the time, how many names has the skydome had now?
This is historically inaccurate or atleast vague.Looking into it further, Henry Dundas worked with William Wilberforce to abolish slavery in the British Empire.
I am okay with my tax dollars being spent for this.You should care those are you're tax dollars that are being spent there.
So you'd rather have tax payers fund this rather than women's shelters and homeless centres.I am okay with my tax dollars being spent for this.
Both can be done at the same time.So you'd rather have tax payers fund this rather than women's shelters and homeless centres.
Duly noted...I'll file you under part of the problem.
No money should be diverted to reactionary woke name changes at the expense of women's shelters or homeless centres. Not a dollar..99% of Torontonians would agree with this.Both can be done at the same time.
I think I'll file you as "conveniently liberal". lol.
It is not being diverted.No money should be diverted to reactionary woke name changes at the expense of women's shelters or homeless centres. Not a dollar..99% of Torontonians would agree with this.
Money being spent on reactionary woke name changes should all go to those who need it.It is not being diverted.
Both are being done.
But you don't care about the shelters.Money being spent on reactionary woke name changes should all go to those who need it.
Women's shelters and homeless shelters desperately need more funding.
If you're worried about tax dollars you should worry about the $2 billion spent on broke foreign spa company, $20 billion missing from health care, $100 billion on a tunnel on the highway and......You should care those are you're tax dollars that are being spent there.
I'm quite sure that there is some women's shelters or homeless centres that could make good use of those funds.
I dunno, but who is still sticking with MAGA when even the shaman left?BTW: why do most of the wokies posts on here
have this "Nurse Ratched" vibe ?
Says who?But you don't care about the shelters.
it's virtue signalling 101 to appease a fringe vocal socially infected few of which you are one.You only care that this is a "woke" name change.
Yes this allotment of taxpayers dollars would be better served going to those who need it not to changing names.No reason to stand on a soapbox over money in this case.
He's his default when all points have failed..he is your hero now
Given your political leanings, I refuse to believe that you are passionate about homeless shelters as much as you are about an opportunity to wage culture war.Says who? it's virtue signalling 101 to appease a fringe vocal socially infected few of which you are one.
Yes this allotment of taxpayers dollars would be better served going to those who need it not to changing names.
I bet he'd be very popular at Sankofa Square.he is your hero now






