The more shots you take the higher your chances of premature death.
Japan study shows excess deaths in vaccinated
- Thread starter K Douglas
- Start date
If you want the actual press conference (well, the English-language one) that Campbell is referring to, it is here.
The data was released a while ago as well, so I'm not sure why he didn't go to it directly in the video.
It's here: https://web.archive.org/web/20250616163457/https://stop-mrna.sakura.ne.jp/db/lot_totalization.php
Note the anti-vax group corrected themselves once they made the data public in June that it was for 18 million doses, not people - so the fact Campbell can't even bother to get that correct almost two months later should tell you quite a bit about how seriously to take his analysis.
The data was released a while ago as well, so I'm not sure why he didn't go to it directly in the video.
It's here: https://web.archive.org/web/20250616163457/https://stop-mrna.sakura.ne.jp/db/lot_totalization.php
Note the anti-vax group corrected themselves once they made the data public in June that it was for 18 million doses, not people - so the fact Campbell can't even bother to get that correct almost two months later should tell you quite a bit about how seriously to take his analysis.
Yes some of us knew this would happen instinctually. Bodies have Intuition. Also allergies to what’s in it. Or other health ailments. I also have a feeling it causes rapid decline in the elderly and they got pushed the vaccines the most. some I know with dementia have had seven shots
You knew, instinctually, that Campbell would be so sloppy and untrustworthy?
I mean if you got the shot(s) and believe the "science", naturally you're going to defend the position you made the right choice.
Then there are those that got it, aren't afraid to admit they regret taking it and openly say so.
And you have those that didn't take it and are still here after that scamdemic.
Then there are those that got it, aren't afraid to admit they regret taking it and openly say so.
And you have those that didn't take it and are still here after that scamdemic.
Last edited:
There are people who know research methodology and who know how to gather data in an unbiased as possible fashion.
Those people don't seem to find that vaccinated are more likely to die.
If not true let's see the data, not YouTube clips of people bloviating.
Data.
Those people don't seem to find that vaccinated are more likely to die.
If not true let's see the data, not YouTube clips of people bloviating.
Data.
Completely agree. The issue here is that if a reputable medical journal publishes an exhaustive study on the outcomes of COVID vaccines and shows they are safe and provide protection, the anti-vaxx folks will still refuse to believe it. They would rather take the word of randos on YouTube who may or may not have a degree in medicine, biology, pharmacology or data analytics.
Dumb people like taking advice from other dumb people. Makes them feel smarter I guess.
When it comes to Covid, I have a friend who keeps repeating, "Do your own research." I guess he means watch videos on Youtube since I am not a Doctor, Scientist, Infectious Disease expert, Nurse, Pharmacist, etc. But then again, neither are the crackpots he watches on Youtube.
When it comes to Covid, I have a friend who keeps repeating, "Do your own research." I guess he means watch videos on Youtube since I am not a Doctor, Scientist, Infectious Disease expert, Nurse, Pharmacist, etc. But then again, neither are the crackpots he watches on Youtube.
But Andrew Wakefield Said The Swelling in the Intestine Puts the Measles in the Brain and that Makes Autisms!
I Got The Vaccine Once And Ever Since I Can't Sit Properly Because The Spike Proteins Are on My Butt Cheeks and it Hurts when I sit.!!!11!1!!
The Doctor in the original post is an actual legit Doctor.
People need to learn and understand that YouTube is a MEDIUM to get info through, just like your TV and radio are/were, it's just a m-e-d-i-u-m, who presents the information is what you should consider.
Next time you're at the hospital (and hopefully not), but if you are, ask the Triage nurses about the rates of cancer they've seen over the years.
I was in a emerg over a year ago, I asked the nurse specifically if she had seen an increase in cancer over the past 3-4 years and she didn't hesitate and in fact, she was emphatic and fast, "yes a lot actually".
I am sure the nurse also told you that they are detected early and have a greater chance of survival.
You think awareness, advance screening and detection methods have nothing to do with this? I mean, people are actually going to medical appointments a lot more now for healthcare scorecards than ever before.
Keep watching Youtube videos, they must be right as they are on the internet.
He is a nurse. His Doctorate is in education not medicine.
You either refuse to accept that it's merely a medium and you're locked in on your old school ways of getting news from your TV/ radio.
Here's an example.
CNN is on YouTube, is CNN less of a news source now that it's using YouTube to reach a wider audience?
the medium is fine (as are all others) the fact that anyone with an opinion can spread misinformation is the problem. A lot of sadly misinformed people accept it as truth because it makes sense to them is dangerous. Again, the medium isn't the problem, the ones delivering some message and their consumers are.
Right, but Dr. Campbell in this case isn't an issue. He is to those who oppose his views at certain times when he presents things.
They probably loved him at first when he was telling everyone how to get the jab and years later he's showing info saying "well, the jabs have caused problems".
They probably loved him at first when he was telling everyone how to get the jab and years later he's showing info saying "well, the jabs have caused problems".
Japan has the highest life expectancy of any country.
Israel has the highest amount of Covid-19 vaccinations with people getting multiple shots.
Does Israel morbidity rates support what this report from Japan is suggesting?
Many are conveniently forgetting the first year of the Covid-19 pandemic with the massive death rate, bodies in refrigerators outside of jam packed hospitals.
Anecdotes are good if they lead to systematic examination. It is the systematic examination that is the gold standard. Sometimes anecdotes are misleading. Murder is down from "the good old days". Yet people believe it's much worse. It turns out how it's portrayed affects estimates of such things. Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky showed 40 plus years ago how the human reliance on heuristic judgments (eg avaiilability, representativeness, anchoring etc) can systematically mislead us.
Thus that's where I go. Science is peer reviewed, and to get published you have to describe your methods in enough detail that anyone with the wherewithall could replicate the study and find out on their own. This is what makes science self-correcting.
So the TRIAGE nurse, who by definition works in the emergency area, says she saw cancer spike?
So she has seen an increase in people walking into emergency and getting themselves checked in for cancer!?!?
This may have more to do with access to family docs or specialists. As in "I already have cancer, but can't get treatment, so I'm going to emerg" whereas pre-Doug Ford, these people would be going to specailists or family docs.
Indeed.
Someone with a bad track record of being unreliable should be viewed with suspicion.
Also, when the data is made public, you can look at the data and how it was analyzed.
These are all important things to do.
