Charlie Kirk Shot in the Neck in Utah (Update: Shooter Alt-right links)

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
29,271
7,084
113
Now I'm going to have dinner. To be continued later.

P.S. you guys should try getting out more, it was a beautiful day to play my shitty golf game
 

KidTwist

Active member
Oct 4, 2024
227
182
43
Just another brand of right-wing extremist Christians. But they usually stick to themselves and aren''t armed in their house in Texas praying for some n*@@r to break into their house or knock on the door of their Castle so they can blow his head off.

But yeah, we hear your bigotry. 👌
Mormon rancher types are pretty extreme.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
32,288
6,083
113
So, no.

The only quote in that article was the one previously mentioned. That doesn't mean "no law", you're projecting.
Lol. Show me where he advocated for any gun control laws. Because someone who chooses acceptable gun deaths is pretty saying that.

He has no quotes that show anything but no restrictions. And he was not shy in speaking. Quite simply the onus on you to prove me wrong. Because I already posted Kirk's words proving me right.
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
30,209
8,169
113
I dare anyone of these pathetic letfys to be HONEST and deal with the fallout. But they won't. Not one of them will come right out and say it. They will just hide behind memes and make jokes. Cowards. Every one of them.
:giggle::LOL::ROFLMAO:

Who are the "Letfys"? :p:giggle::LOL::ROFLMAO:

Since when were the righties posting any facts on this Board?? But you even mentioning anything about "Honesty" is HILARIOUS!!:LOL::ROFLMAO:😅😂
 
  • Haha
Reactions: optimusprime69

SchlongConery

License to Shill
Jan 28, 2013
14,442
8,778
113
Mormon rancher types are pretty extreme.
I don't know them well enough.. they lost me at the Magic Underwear. 😂

As did all religions with their nonsense magical beliefs. And I ain't wearing no stupid hats either. Turban, hijab, kufi, yarmulke, Mitre, head bonnet... and certainly not the Cult's Red baseball hats.
 
Last edited:

cunning linguist

Well-known member
Oct 13, 2009
1,763
200
63
Lol. Show me where he advocated for any gun control laws. Because someone who chooses acceptable gun deaths is pretty saying that.

He has no quotes that show anything but no restrictions. And he was not shy in speaking. Quite simply the onus on you to prove me wrong. Because I already posted Kirk's words proving me right.
Those words didn't "prove you right" though.

Stating that gun deaths is a reality of gun use and ownership doesn't advocate gun violence; that's a projection. Someone owning and operating a vehicle doesn't suddenly make them pro-drunk driving.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
101,052
28,250
113
Those words didn't "prove you right" though.

Stating that gun deaths is a reality of gun use and ownership doesn't advocate gun violence; that's a projection. Someone owning and operating a vehicle doesn't suddenly make them pro-drunk driving.
In a land with zero guns there will be zero gun deaths.
In a land with 400 million there will be a lot of gun deaths.

That's what guns are designed to do.
Kill things.
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
83,945
121,097
113
Those words didn't "prove you right" though.

Stating that gun deaths is a reality of gun use and ownership doesn't advocate gun violence; that's a projection. Someone owning and operating a vehicle doesn't suddenly make them pro-drunk driving.
But again, a vehicle has a legit social purpose. Gun ownership is a fetish of the American right.

So it's a false equivalence.
 

cunning linguist

Well-known member
Oct 13, 2009
1,763
200
63
In a land with zero guns there will be zero gun deaths.
In a land with 400 million there will be a lot of gun deaths.

That's what guns are designed to do.
Kill things.
In a land with zero cars and zero alcohol, there will be zero drunk driving deaths.

Do you have any more "insightful revalations" like that gem? :rolleyes:
 

cunning linguist

Well-known member
Oct 13, 2009
1,763
200
63
But again, a vehicle has a legit social purpose. Gun ownership is a fetish of the American right.

So it's a false equivalence.
No, it isn't.

One is a licensed privilege, one is an enumerated right in the United States.

The "legit social purpose" of private vehicle ownership could just as easily be downplayed as the private ownership of firearms for self defense.
 

SchlongConery

License to Shill
Jan 28, 2013
14,442
8,778
113
Those words didn't "prove you right" though.

Stating that gun deaths is a reality of gun use and ownership doesn't advocate gun violence; that's a projection. Someone owning and operating a vehicle doesn't suddenly make them pro-drunk driving.
Fair points.

But Kirk didn't just mention it factually, he minimizes and commodifies those individual innocent people who have innocently died by gun deaths as the price American society pays for the 2nd amendment rights.

Even his last words tried to deflect gun violence being significantly related to gang violence.

The leading cause of death of children and teenagers in the United States are guns. And check out the second chart to see how other countries like Canada without this valuable God given right to firearms compare.

1757717641816.png 1757717797571.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: mandrill
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts