Asia Studios Massage

update - Trump floats Ghislaine Maxwell pardon, also Diddy

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
84,495
123,774
113
FIFA vice-president Victor Montagliani has confirmed that any decision to move 2026 World Cup matches away from host cities would rest with FIFA, not Donald Trump.

This follows remarks made last week by the United States President, who spoke about the possibility of relocating games from cities he considered "dangerous".



more

While FIFA president Gianni Infantino has developed a close bond with Trump, whose country is co-hosting the finals alongside Canada and Mexico, Montagliani insisted that all host city decisions remain a matter for FIFA.

“It’s FIFA’s tournament, FIFA’s jurisdiction, FIFA makes those decisions,” he said at Leaders Week London at the Allianz Stadium.




President Trump said last week his administration would make sure cities were “safe”, adding that Seattle and San Francisco were “run by radical left lunatics who don’t know what they’re doing”.

“If any city we think is going to be even a little bit dangerous for the World Cup… because they’re playing in so many cities, we won’t allow it,” Trump added.


more

“We’ll move it around a little bit.”

Seattle’s Lumen Field is set to host six matches at next summer’s finals, with Levi’s Stadium in Santa Clara – an hour away from San Francisco – due to host a further six.

Montagliani said football was “bigger” than the polarised political rhetoric evident in the US at the moment, and added: “With all due respect to current world leaders, football is bigger than them and football will survive their regime and their government and their slogans.”

Asked whether the political situation in the US caused him and FIFA a headache, Montagliani said: “It depends, you know. Motrin more than Tylenol – although we’re not allowed to have Tylenol any more!

“That’s the beauty of our game, is that it is bigger than any individual and bigger than any country.”



Victor Montagliani (left), pictured with FIFA president Gianni Infantino at last summer’s Olympics (Mike Egerton/PA)
The reference to Tylenol follows an announcement from the Trump administration regarding a link between taking paracetamol when pregnant and autism in children. The World Health Organisation says there is “no conclusive evidence” of a link and urged pregnant women to follow their doctors’ advice.



more

European viewers of next year’s World Cup could face some late nights, with Montagliani insisting the intense summer heat would be taken into consideration when scheduling games.

Montagliani said FIFA would “learn” from the experience of players and spectators at this summer’s Club World Cup.

Venues such as Atlanta, Dallas and Los Angeles have the option of being under cover and air-conditioned, allowing for afternoon kick-off times, but Montagliani says it is a difficult balancing act.



Argentina captain Lionel Messi lifts the FIFA World Cup trophy in December 2022
“We’re in conversations daily with the European broadcasters in terms of what stadiums you can play in at 3pm – the likes of Atlanta, for instance.

“Obviously what we’re trying to do, once the schedule does come out after the draw in December, is our best to ensure that all that’s taken into consideration.


“Now, will there be every game that’ll be absolutely perfect kick-off time from a TV perspective?

“I don’t know, because there’s a lot of games, but that’s all taken into consideration.”

Montagliani reiterated his opposition to expanding the World Cup to 64 teams for the centenary tournament in 2030, an idea which has been proposed by the South American confederation.


However, he seemed more enthusiastic about the possibility of expanding the Club World Cup – next due to be played in 2029 – from 32 teams to 48.

“I don’t see the argument for 64 teams. It’s not just us, but UEFA and Asia who are opposed to that,” he said.

“But the Club World Cup was a massive success. We need to work out what’s feasible, (what) changes we need to make about the number of teams and the caps on each country we had for this year.”

Fifa says Donald Trump can’t move World Cup matches despite threat to ‘left lunatic’ cities
 

Dutch Oven

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2019
7,018
2,485
113
FIFA vice-president Victor Montagliani has confirmed that any decision to move 2026 World Cup matches away from host cities would rest with FIFA, not Donald Trump.

This follows remarks made last week by the United States President, who spoke about the possibility of relocating games from cities he considered "dangerous".



more

While FIFA president Gianni Infantino has developed a close bond with Trump, whose country is co-hosting the finals alongside Canada and Mexico, Montagliani insisted that all host city decisions remain a matter for FIFA.

“It’s FIFA’s tournament, FIFA’s jurisdiction, FIFA makes those decisions,” he said at Leaders Week London at the Allianz Stadium.




President Trump said last week his administration would make sure cities were “safe”, adding that Seattle and San Francisco were “run by radical left lunatics who don’t know what they’re doing”.

“If any city we think is going to be even a little bit dangerous for the World Cup… because they’re playing in so many cities, we won’t allow it,” Trump added.


more

“We’ll move it around a little bit.”

Seattle’s Lumen Field is set to host six matches at next summer’s finals, with Levi’s Stadium in Santa Clara – an hour away from San Francisco – due to host a further six.

Montagliani said football was “bigger” than the polarised political rhetoric evident in the US at the moment, and added: “With all due respect to current world leaders, football is bigger than them and football will survive their regime and their government and their slogans.”

Asked whether the political situation in the US caused him and FIFA a headache, Montagliani said: “It depends, you know. Motrin more than Tylenol – although we’re not allowed to have Tylenol any more!

“That’s the beauty of our game, is that it is bigger than any individual and bigger than any country.”



Victor Montagliani (left), pictured with FIFA president Gianni Infantino at last summer’s Olympics (Mike Egerton/PA)
The reference to Tylenol follows an announcement from the Trump administration regarding a link between taking paracetamol when pregnant and autism in children. The World Health Organisation says there is “no conclusive evidence” of a link and urged pregnant women to follow their doctors’ advice.



more

European viewers of next year’s World Cup could face some late nights, with Montagliani insisting the intense summer heat would be taken into consideration when scheduling games.

Montagliani said FIFA would “learn” from the experience of players and spectators at this summer’s Club World Cup.

Venues such as Atlanta, Dallas and Los Angeles have the option of being under cover and air-conditioned, allowing for afternoon kick-off times, but Montagliani says it is a difficult balancing act.



Argentina captain Lionel Messi lifts the FIFA World Cup trophy in December 2022
“We’re in conversations daily with the European broadcasters in terms of what stadiums you can play in at 3pm – the likes of Atlanta, for instance.

“Obviously what we’re trying to do, once the schedule does come out after the draw in December, is our best to ensure that all that’s taken into consideration.


“Now, will there be every game that’ll be absolutely perfect kick-off time from a TV perspective?

“I don’t know, because there’s a lot of games, but that’s all taken into consideration.”

Montagliani reiterated his opposition to expanding the World Cup to 64 teams for the centenary tournament in 2030, an idea which has been proposed by the South American confederation.


However, he seemed more enthusiastic about the possibility of expanding the Club World Cup – next due to be played in 2029 – from 32 teams to 48.

“I don’t see the argument for 64 teams. It’s not just us, but UEFA and Asia who are opposed to that,” he said.

“But the Club World Cup was a massive success. We need to work out what’s feasible, (what) changes we need to make about the number of teams and the caps on each country we had for this year.”

Fifa says Donald Trump can’t move World Cup matches despite threat to ‘left lunatic’ cities
LOL! This is FIFA's "The Beatles are bigger than Jesus" moment!

I guess insufferable arrogance and corruption is ok, as long as it is in opposition to Trump, right?

In summary, FIFA and the World Cup are not more significant than public order, sovereignty, or the right to to police and maintain national security. Soccer, as much as I enjoy it, is just entertainment.
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
84,495
123,774
113
LOL! This is FIFA's "The Beatles are bigger than Jesus" moment!

I guess insufferable arrogance and corruption is ok, as long as it is in opposition to Trump, right?

In summary, FIFA and the World Cup are not more significant than public order, sovereignty, or the right to to police and maintain national security. Soccer, as much as I enjoy it, is just entertainment.
What do you think will happen to FIFA games in San F? Mass transexuality? Lesbian cannabis use? Woke use of pronouns?
 

Dutch Oven

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2019
7,018
2,485
113
What do you think will happen to FIFA games in San F? Mass transexuality? Lesbian cannabis use? Woke use of pronouns?
SF is a sh%thole, literally. I wouldn't want tourism in my country to be promoted or represented by any place like it, and I wouldn't want to have to ensure the safety of unwary travelers from the thousands of foul denizens of that (sh)ity.

When you hold an open house for your friends during the holidays, you have the good sense not to let anyone wander off mistakenly into your teenagers filthy room.
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
84,495
123,774
113
SF is a sh%thole, literally. I wouldn't want tourism in my country to be promoted or represented by any place like it, and I wouldn't want to have to ensure the safety of unwary travelers from the thousands of foul denizens of that (sh)ity.

When you hold an open house for your friends during the holidays, you have the good sense not to let anyone wander off mistakenly into your teenagers filthy room.
Odd comment regarding one of the most prosperous cities in the world.

Don't all of those red state cities have far higher violent crime stats??
 

Dutch Oven

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2019
7,018
2,485
113

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
84,495
123,774
113

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
84,495
123,774
113
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Justice Department fired a top national security prosecutor amid criticism from a right-wing commentator over his work during the Biden administration, further roiling the prominent U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Virginia after the ousting of other senior attorneys in recent weeks, according to people familiar with the matter.



more

Michael Ben'Ary, who was chief of the office's national security unit, was fired Wednesday just hours after Julie Kelly, a conservative writer and activist, shared online that he previously worked as senior counsel to Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco during the Biden administration, two people familiar with the matter said. The people spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss personnel matters.

Kelly’s post speculated that Ben’Ary may have been part of the “internal resistance” in the office to the recently charged case against FBI Director James Comey. But Ben’Ary played no role in the Comey case, one of the people said.

His termination comes days after the firing of another prosecutor in the Alexandria, Virginia, office: Maya Song, the people said. Song had served as the top deputy to former U.S. Attorney Erik Siebert, who was nominated by President Donald Trump but pushed out last month amid pressure from the administration to bring charges against New York Attorney General Letitia James in a mortgage fraud investigation.



more

The firings are the latest in a wave of terminations that have thrown the department into turmoil and raised alarm over political influence over the traditionally independent law enforcement agency and the erosion of civil service protections afforded to federal employees. While U.S. attorneys generally change with a new president, rank-and-file prosecutors by tradition remain with the department across administrations. The Trump administration, however, has fired prosecutors involved in the U.S. Capitol riot criminal cases and lawyers who worked on special counsel Jack Smith’s prosecutions of Trump, among others.

Ben'Ary worked for the Justice Department for nearly two decades and was promoted under both Republican and Democratic administrations. He was currently prosecuting the case against the suspected planner in the suicide bombing at the Kabul airport that killed 13 American service members and roughly 170 Afghan civilians during the chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan.



more

Song was fired Friday shortly after the Trump administration installed a new U.S. attorney, Lindsey Halligan, a former White House aide who had been one of Trump’s personal lawyers but had not previously served as a federal prosecutor. Halligan was put in the top job after Trump publicly pressed Attorney General Pam Bondi in an extraordinary social media post to move forward with pursuing cases against some of his political opponents.

Days after that post, Halligan secured the indictment of Comey on allegations that he lied to Congress when he said he had not authorized anyone else at the FBI to be an anonymous source in news reports about a particular investigation. Comey, who is expected to make his initial court appearance next week, has denied any wrongdoing and said: “My heart is broken for the Department of Justice.”

Alanna Durkin Richer And Eric Tucker, The Associated Press

Justice Department fires key prosecutor in elite office already beset by turmoil, AP sources say
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
84,495
123,774
113
Federal immigration agents may be present at February‘s Super Bowl, where Puerto Rican star Bad Bunny will perform at halftime, according to a top Trump administration advisor.

“There is nowhere that you can provide safe haven to people who are in this country illegally. Not the Super Bowl and nowhere else,” Department of Homeland advisor Corey Lewandowski said during an interview aired Wednesday with Benny Johnson’s The Benny Show.




more

“We will find you,” he continued. “We will apprehend you. We will put you in a detention facility, and we will deport you. So know that that is a very real situation under this administration, which is completely contrary to what how it used to be.”

The Independent has contacted the NFL for comment.

“There is no safe haven for violent criminal illegal aliens in the United States,” a DHS spokesperson told The Independent when asked if immigration agents would be at the game.

The comments came as Lewandowski was discussing the selection of Bad Bunny to play the halftime show during the bowl match-up, set to take place at Levi’s Stadium in Santa Clara, California.

During a recent interview with i-D magazine, the artist, one of the most popular singers in the world, said one reason he avoided U.S. stops on a recent world tour was out of fear his fan base would be targeted by Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

more

“There were many reasons why I didn’t show up in the US, and none of them were out of hate—I’ve performed there many times,” said, adding, “But there was the issue of—like, f***ing ICE could be outside [my concert]. And it’s something that we were talking about and very concerned about.”

At the time of Bad Bunny’s comments, Homeland Security officials dismissed the notion of immigration agents showing up at a concert in the U.S.

"Bad Bunny is either seriously misinformed about ICE operations or is using law enforcement as an excuse because he won't be able to sell tickets in the United States,” a DHS official told NPR. “ICE is not raiding concert venues. Pop stars choosing to fearmonger and demonize ICE law enforcement are contributing to the nearly 1,000% increase in assaults on ICE officers.”

Outside of the immigration comments, some on the right have taken issue with Bad Bunny’s selection as the half-time performer, pointing to his past criticisms of Donald Trump, his mostly Spanish-language songs, and his choice to defy gender norms through fashion.

Johnson, in previous comments, called Bad Bunny a “Massive Trump hater” and an “anti-ICE activist,” whose selection showed the NFL was “self-destructing.”



Bad Bunny said recently he skipped touring in the U.S. to avoid fans being targeted by immigration agents (Getty)
Meanwhile, Robbie Starbuck of the conservative Heritage Foundation accused the NFL of “pushing left-wing social issues.”

“Is it that hard to pick a unifying music act who doesn't want to peddle woke propaganda? Does this guy really scream American football to anyone? Be for real with me,” Starbuck said. “No one thinks he does. This isn't about music, it's about putting a guy on stage who hates Trump and MAGA.”

Trump adviser says ICE agents will attend Super Bowl after Bad Bunny announced as half-time act: ‘We will find you’
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
84,495
123,774
113
NASHVILLE, Tenn. (AP) — A U.S. immigration judge has denied a bid for asylum from Kilmar Abrego Garcia, whose case has become a proxy for the partisan power struggle over immigration policy.

The judge in Baltimore on Wednesday rejected an application to reopen Abrego Garcia's 2019 asylum case, but that is not the final word. Abrego Garcia has 30 days to appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals.



more

The Salvadoran national has an American wife and children and has lived in Maryland for years, but he immigrated to the United States illegally as a teenager. In 2019, he was arrested by immigration agents. He requested asylum but was not eligible because he had been in the U.S. for more than a year. But the judge ruled he could not be deported to El Salvador, where he faced danger from a gang that targeted his family.

He was mistakenly deported to El Salvador by President Donald Trump's administration in March and was held in a notorious prison, and his case soon became a rallying point for those who oppose the Republican president’s immigration crackdown. Facing a ruling from the Supreme Court, the administration returned him to the U.S. in June, only to immediately charge him with human smuggling.

Abrego Garcia faces criminal charges in Tennessee, based on a 2022 traffic stop. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement is also seeking to deport him to a third country, proposing Uganda first and then Eswatini, a small country in southern Africa where the king still holds absolute power. His attorneys have denounced the criminal charges and the deportation efforts, saying they are an attempt to punish him for standing up to the administration.



more

Abrego Garcia's request to reopen his asylum case is a calculated risk. If approved, asylum could provide him with a green card and a path to citizenship. But if he loses, an immigration judge could remove his protection from being returned to his native country. That could place him back in the infamous Terrorism Confinement Center, or CECOT. It’s where, he alleges in a lawsuit, he suffered severe beatings, sleep deprivation and psychological torture. El Salvador’s president, Nayib Bukele, has denied those allegations.

Trump administration officials have waged a relentless public relations campaign against Abrego Garcia, repeatedly referring to him as a member of the MS-13 gang, among other things, despite the fact he has not been convicted of any crimes.

His lawyers have filed motions requesting a gag order and say he will not be able to receive a fair trial because of the “highly prejudicial, inflammatory, and false statements" made about him.



more

While the federal judge in Tennessee can order prosecutors there not to make any prejudicial statements about Abrego Garcia, it is unclear whether the judge's authority extends to the Department of Homeland Security, which posted about the immigration court ruling on X on Wednesday.

“His lawyers tried to fight his removal from the U.S. but one thing is certain, this Salvadoran man is not going to be able to remain in our country," according to the post.

Travis Loller, The Associated Press

Immigration judge denies Kilmar Abrego Garcia’s bid for asylum, but he has 30 days to appeal
 

kherg007

Well-known member
May 3, 2014
10,200
9,435
113
Isnt Bad Bunny Puerto Rican? Puerto Ricans are American citizens.
How is ICE going to arrest or hassle that?
This has to be a joke.
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
84,495
123,774
113
Isnt Bad Bunny Puerto Rican? Puerto Ricans are American citizens.
How is ICE going to arrest or hassle that?
This has to be a joke.
Trump may not have figured out yet that PR is actually part of America....
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
84,495
123,774
113
(Reuters) -As she has done several times recently, liberal Justice Elena Kagan last week sounded the alarm after another bold emergency action by the U.S. Supreme Court's conservative majority again let President Donald Trump carry out one of his policies without taking the usual time or deliberation to review its legality.



more

The court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority, allowed Trump to withhold $4 billion in foreign aid despite a judge's decision that he cannot simply not spend funds appropriated by Congress. The emergency docket, with its scant briefing and lack of oral arguments, Kagan wrote in a dissent, was not appropriate for yet another high-stakes decision from the top U.S. judicial body given the "uncharted territory" of the dispute.

Typically, Kagan wrote, "we will decide cases of far less import with far more process and reflection." When the justices start their new nine-month term on Monday, they will assess their regular cases over months before issuing definitive rulings.

Since Trump returned to office on January 20, the court has acted in 23 cases on an emergency basis involving his policies, siding with him fully or partially 21 times, with one case declared moot.



more

In doing so, the court has expanded how it uses its emergency power, following at least six different legal paths to side with Trump, usually in decisions powered by the conservative justices, a Reuters analysis has found.

While the court has faced criticism for issuing its decisions on its emergency docket - also called the "shadow" or "interim" docket - often with little or no explanation, in 14 of the 21 cases backing Trump it has presented at least some rationale, the Reuters analysis showed.

These decisions have let Trump's aggressive and sometimes novel uses of executive authority proceed largely unhindered before their legality is fully determined, increasing his power in ways that critics have said undermines Congress and the various federal judges who have ruled against him.

Here are six paths taken by the court this year in deciding Trump-related emergency docket cases:


more

- It identified specific errors by federal judges in four cases. For instance, it said that several nonprofit groups that had challenged the administration's firing of thousands of federal probationary employees lacked the legal standing to sue.

- It paused two lower court decisions against Trump by applying the traditional legal test for deciding whether a challenged policy should be blocked while litigation plays out. This test often hinges on a prediction of which side is likely to prevail on the legal merits. One of those cases allowed Trump to pursue mass federal layoffs.

- It signaled in cases involving Trump's firing of Democratic officials from federal agencies that it potentially will overturn an existing legal precedent.

- It twice issued opinions that lawsuits challenging a Trump policy were brought in the wrong lower court. One of those cases was a challenge to Trump's use of a 1798 law, historically used only in wartime, to carry out deportations.


- It cited its own previous emergency decisions as binding on lower courts, for instance one in which the justices allowed Trump's cuts to National Institutes of Health grants for research related to racial minorities or LGBT people.

- And in one instance - the administration's challenge to judicial rulings against his bid to restrict birthright citizenship - it issued a ruling after hearing oral arguments.

THE BOUNDARIES OF POWER

The actions by the justices have expanded the emergency docket's "effective power without the court formally acknowledging it," Bradley University law professor Taraleigh Davis said.

This expansion in turn boosts Trump's power, Davis added, because if administration officials know they are "likely to receive a stay on the emergency docket they can implement controversial policies immediately and fight the legal battle with the policy already in effect."


The court in emergency decisions has let Trump ban transgender people from the military, carry out mass firings of federal employees, remove agency officials despite statutory job protections and deport migrants to countries where they have no ties like South Sudan, to name a few, while litigation continues in lower courts. The practical effects of some of these decisions could be hard to unwind even if plaintiffs eventually win on the legal merits.

"These aren't decisions that somehow maintain the status quo. If they give the president the benefit of the doubt, that might mean that your husband ends up in an El Salvador prison ... that means your research doesn't get funded," Tulane University constitutional law professor Stephen Griffin said.

The fact that the justices are treating their emergency decisions as binding on lower courts has surprised and vexed some judges who did not understand that such actions carried the same force of precedent as the Supreme Court's regular rulings.


Treating these orders as precedent creates tension, Davis said, because such orders previously were thought to "decide only on interim relief, not the legal questions. But if lower courts have to follow this reasoning as precedent, then emergency docket orders are effectively deciding the law."

The court signaled it may overturn its 1935 precedent that permitted laws restricting a president's power to oust members of independent agencies without cause. This came when it allowed Trump's firing of Democratic members of various independent federal agencies without cause.

The one Trump-related emergency case that has been the subject of oral arguments involved his effort to restrict birthright citizenship. The justices did not decide the policy's legality, but instead issued a major ruling buttressing presidential power by curbing the authority of federal judges to block policies nationwide.


LIBERAL DISSENT

The outvoted liberal justices repeatedly have warned that the emergency docket should not be used to make "new law" or, as Kagan said in September when dissenting from a decision allowing Trump's firing of a Federal Trade Commission member, "to permit what our own precedent bars."

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson in August compared the emergency docket to "Calvinball," a game from the comic strip "Calvin and Hobbes" in which the one rule is that there are no fixed rules.

"We seem to have two: that one, and this administration always wins," Jackson wrote.

Griffin noted that many of the court's emergency actions have come in policy areas where it traditionally has given deference to presidents such as immigration, foreign affairs and firings. Its conservative majority also has increasingly embraced a legal theory called the "unitary executive" placing power over the executive branch solely in the hands of the president, Griffin noted.


"The conservatives on the court do not think that they've crossed some line," Griffin said.

Conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who Trump appointed to the court in 2020, was asked during a question-and-answer session at an event in New York last month about the danger of a president's far-reaching actions going unchecked. Barrett responded that a president too can be harmed if an executive order is actually lawful but remains blocked by the judiciary.

'PERFECTLY FINE'

The administration has faced more than 300 lawsuits challenging Trump's policies since he returned to office.

"The administration has picked out a small fraction of those to bring to the court, where the arguments that either what it's doing is perfectly fine or the district courts really got out over their skis are easiest to make," William & Mary Law School professor Jonathan Adler said.


The court may be called upon eventually to issue definitive rulings on the merits in some cases in which it has already acted via the emergency docket, meaning it remains possible it would rule against Trump.

For now, however, the court's conservative majority may be trying to give Trump the benefit of the doubt while avoiding a direct showdown with an emergency ruling against him.

"The majority may be trying hard to avoid, or at least maximally postpone, being put in a position when the court is issuing the administration an unambiguous order that Trump may defy," New York University School of Law constitutional scholar Peter Shane said.

(Reporting by Andrew Chung; Editing by Will Dunham in Washington)

US Supreme Court expands its 'emergency' docket - and Trump's power too
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
84,495
123,774
113
FBI director Kash Patel has terminated the bureau’s partnership with the Anti-Defamation League following anger from MAGA over the group’s decision to list Charlie Kirk’s Turning Point USA as “extremist.”

The FBI had an intelligence-sharing and training partnership with the group, which campaigns to fight antisemitism, but now Patel has pulled the plug on the arrangement.



more

Patel also accused the organization of “spying” on conservative groups.

In 2019, the ADL — whose core mission is to combat defamation against Jewish people and organizations — published a since-deleted highly critical backgrounder page about the organization and its late leader, accusing Turning Point of promoting “Christian nationalism” and detailing the group’s ties to “far-right extremists and white nationalists.”

The page has been taken down, but it has prompted fury from prominent MAGA figures.

Elon Musk, who in the past couple of years has whipped up support for far-right movements in the United Kingdom and Germany, accused the group of becoming a “far left hate propaganda machine” Sunday in a post on X.

“The ADL hates Christians, therefore it is a hate group,” the billionaire said oif the group, which fights antisemitism.

The group has shared hundreds of tips about extremist activity with the FBI and other law enforcement agencies over the years, but Patel accused it of “spying on Americans” Wednesday in a post on X.



more

He cited remarks made by former FBI director James Comey, who in 2014 made training sessions with the ADL mandatory for agents.

“If this sounds a bit like a love letter to the ADL, it is, and rightly so,” Comey said in a speech at an ADL summit in 2014.

Patel seized upon the comments to justify cutting ties with the group.



In 2019, the ADL published a since-deleted highly critical backgrounder page about the organization and its late leader, accusing Turning Point of promoting ‘Christian nationalism’ (Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.)© (Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.)
“James Comey wrote ‘love letters’ to the ADL and embedded FBI agents with them - a group that ran disgraceful ops spying on Americans,” Patel said. “That era is OVER. This FBI won’t partner with political fronts masquerading as watchdogs.”

The move follows Comey’s criminal indictment last week, accusing him of making false statements and obstructing a congressional proceeding in September 2020. He denies any wrongdoing.



more

In a statement, the ADL said it remained “more committed than ever” to its cause of “protecting the Jewish people.”

“As we prepare to observe the holiest day of the year on the Jewish calendar, we have seen the statement from FBI Director Patel regarding the FBI's relationship with ADL,” the organization said.

“ADL has deep respect for the Federal Bureau of Investigation and law enforcement officers at all levels across the country who work tirelessly every single day to protect all Americans regardless of their ancestry, religion, ethnicity, faith, political affiliation or any other point of difference.”

Kash Patel terminates FBI’s relationship with the ADL after group listed Charlie Kirk’s Turning Point as ‘extremist’
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts