update - Judge Boasberg pushes forward with criminal contempt hearing re Noem deportation of Abrego Garcia

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
87,113
133,432
113
Trump sued over East Wing demolition in new legal battle meant to crush his grand ballroom dreams


The National Trust for Historic Preservation on Friday sued President Donald Trump over the destruction of the White House's East Wing, calling his ballroom project 'unlawful.'

The suit, filed in the US District Court for the District of Columbia, argued that Trump and other top administration figures, skipped over processes that they were required to do by law when bulldozing the East Wing earlier this fall.



more

The preservationists' lawsuit was filed Friday because construction on Trump's ballroom continues, but plans have yet to be submitted to the National Capital Planning Commission, which is required by the National Capital Planning Act, the Trust argued.

'No president is legally allowed to tear down portions of the White House without any review whatsoever - not President Trump, not President Biden, and not anyone else,' the filing said. 'And no president is legally allowed to construct a ballroom on public property without giving the public the opportunity to weigh in.'

When a construction project goes through the NCPC, there's traditionally a period for public comment.

The lawsuit also pointed out that no environmental review has been completed, nor has Congress approved construction, with the National Trust for Historic Preservation arguing that needed to happen because the White House is situated on federal parklands.



more

The lawsuit names Trump, along with Interior Secretary Doug Burgum and the acting heads of the General Services Administration, which manages federal buildings, and the National Park Service, among the defendants.

'President Trump's efforts to do so should be immediately halted, and work on the Ballroom Project should be paused until the Defendants complete the required reviews - reviews that should have taken place before the Defendants demolished the East Wing, and before they began construction of the Ballroom - and secure the necessary approvals,' the filing said.


President Donald Trump approved the demolition of the East Wing without going through the proper channels, a new lawsuit alleges from a top historic preservation group. A piece of machinery crashes through the East Wing wall in October

President Donald Trump approved the demolition of the East Wing without going through the proper channels, a new lawsuit alleges from a top historic preservation group. A piece of machinery crashes through the East Wing wall in October

Pictures from last week show the East Wing entirely gone and a large crane hovering over the White House complex as work on President Donald Trump's ballroom continues, despite no design being finalized

Pictures from last week show the East Wing entirely gone and a large crane hovering over the White House complex as work on President Donald Trump's ballroom continues, despite no design being finalized
The White House swiped back Friday afternoon saying that everything has been done above board.

'President Trump has full legal authority to modernize, renovate and beautify the White House - just like all of his predecessors did,' spokesperson Davis Ingle told the Daily Mail.



more

Trump and White House officials have also argued that the ballroom won't cost taxpayers a dime, as it's being constructed using private donations.

A White House source also told the Daily Mail that the administration still planned to submit the ballroom plans to the NCPC 'at the appropriate time when they are ready.'

Ahead of the East Wing's demolition, Trump appointed White House Staff Secretary Will Scharf to chair the NCPC.

Scharf, a lawyer by trade, argued that NCPC doesn't oversee demolitions, only construction, which allowed the East Wing to be torn down without any government oversight.

The move riled up historic preservations and veterans of the first ladies offices, which were housed there.

As a large crane hovers over the White House and Melania Trump complains to her husband about noise, as he recently relayed to a crowd, the blueprints for Trump's ballroom have yet to be finalized.


The White House did not reveal that the East Wing would be completely torn down when unveiling the ballroom project, but workers started tearing at the facade in October

The White House did not reveal that the East Wing would be completely torn down when unveiling the ballroom project, but workers started tearing at the facade in October

The last remnant of the East Wing, the booksellers room where guests were announced during White House state dinners, was photographed in late October. It appears that structure has been destroyed too

The last remnant of the East Wing, the booksellers room where guests were announced during White House state dinners, was photographed in late October. It appears that structure has been destroyed too

Construction crews work in the area where the East Wing once stood earlier this month. Friday's lawsuit could further delay the project after the head architect was replaced

Construction crews work in the area where the East Wing once stood earlier this month. Friday's lawsuit could further delay the project after the head architect was replaced
The Washington Post reported last week that the president had replaced the ballroom's architect James McCrery II after clashing over the size of the building, though the two men are still on good terms.

Architect Shalom Baranes has been chosen to lead the project.

The Architect's Newspaper reported Thursday that 29 architects who are part of the 'historic preservation community' signed onto a letter urging Baranes to ditch the project due to the White House demolishing the East Wing without public comment, among other transgressions.


'The Trump administration has destroyed a significant portion of our country's most significant treasure by demolishing the historic East Wing of the White House,' the letter read.

A representative for Shalom Baranes Associates did not immediately respond to the Daily Mail's request for comment.
 
  • Angry
Reactions: SchlongConery

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
87,113
133,432
113
DOJ seeks to oust judge ahead of DHS contempt hearing: report


The Department of Justice (DOJ) filed paperwork on Friday seeking the ouster of U.S. District Judge James Boasberg before he can hold a contempt hearing aimed at Department of Homeland Security officials who ignored his legal directive on deportations.

At the center of the dispute is Boasberg ordering DHS to halt deportation flights containing immigrants months ago, which was ignored by Donald Trump administration officials. DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, in recent days, said she overruled the judge.



Noem, who was grilled mercilessly by Democrats in a hearing on Thursday that concluded when she walked out on questions by claiming she had to get to a meeting that had already been cancelled, is at the center of next week's court hearing.

According to a report from The Hill, Attorney Pam Bondi's DOJ is asserting that there is a “strong appearance that the district judge is engaged in a pattern of retaliation and harassment, and has developed too strong a bias to preside over this matter impartially.”


The filing contends, “This long-running saga never should have begun; should not have continued at all after this Court’s last intervention; and certainly should not be allowed to escalate into the unseemly and unnecessary interbranch conflict that it now imminently portends.”

Boasberg is expected to hear testimony from former DOJ employee Erez Reuveni, who turned whistleblower about the refusal to halt flights that took more than 100 Venezuelans to a high-security prison in El Salvador, where Noem notoriously had her photo taken in front of prisoners at a later date.

According to the Hill, “The testimony will inform Boasberg as he considers referring Trump administration officials for criminal contempt after finding his March order to turn around deportation flights being carried out under the AEA was violated.”

You can read more here.
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
87,113
133,432
113
Florida plows ahead with push to roll back certain vaccine mandates for schoolchildren


PANAMA CITY BEACH, Fla. (AP) — Florida officials are plowing ahead with a proposal to roll back certain vaccine mandates for the state's schoolchildren, after Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis called for the state to become the first in the nation to eliminate all school vaccination requirements.



FILE - Vaccines are advertised outside a pharmacy in Miami, Thursday, Sept. 4, 2025. (AP Photo/Rebecca Blackwell, File)© The Associated Press
Pediatricians, infectious disease physicians and teachers have decried the push to undermine vaccines, which for generations have been a cornerstone of public health policy for keeping children and adults safe from potentially deadly — but preventable — diseases.

Experts have warned that doing away with the mandates could allow for a dangerous resurgence of preventable childhood diseases and deaths, amounting to a reversal of one of the greatest advancements in public health history.

Dozens of parents, physicians, educators and advocates crowded into a hotel conference room in Panama City Beach on Friday to testify on a rule change proposed by the Florida Department of Health that would eliminate requirements that Florida children receive the hepatitis B, varicella and Haemophilus influenzae type b or Hib vaccines in order to attend public or private K-12 schools. The proposal also does away with a requirement for the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine for children attending child care facilities.


Larry Downs of Pensacola, Fla., testifies against childhood vaccine mandates at a public hearing held by Florida’s Department of Health on Friday, Dec. 12, 2025 in Panama City Beach, Fla. (AP Photo/Kate Payne)

Larry Downs of Pensacola, Fla., testifies against childhood vaccine mandates at a public hearing held by Florida’s Department of Health on Friday, Dec. 12, 2025 in Panama City Beach, Fla. (AP Photo/Kate Payne)© The Associated Press
Other state mandates related to vaccines for polio, mumps, tetanus and other diseases are enshrined in Florida law and would require legislative action to be rolled back.

Pediatrician Eehab Kenawy, who practices in Panama City, detailed two unvaccinated children his hospital has cared for in the past six months, both of whom contracted Hib, which can cause severe infections and brain swelling.



more

“One child unfortunately succumbed at four months of age. No vaccines," Kenawy said.

The mother of another Hib patient, a two-and-a-half-year-old, begged to have her child vaccinated after the child developed a grave brain infection, Kenawy said.

"Quote unquote, mother's words: ‘please give my child every vaccine you can,' " he said. “This is what we're seeing.”

Florida Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo, who has long clashed with the medical establishment, has cast current requirements in schools and elsewhere as “immoral” intrusions on people’s rights that hamper parents’ ability to make health decisions for their children.

All U.S. states and territories require that children attending child care centers and schools be vaccinated against a number of diseases, including, measles, mumps, polio, tetanus, whooping cough and chickenpox.

All states allow exemptions for children with medical conditions that prevent them from receiving certain vaccines. Most also permit exemptions for religious or other nonmedical reasons.

Emotional public hearing

Friday's public hearing grew emotional at times, as parents and activists opposed to the mandates heralded the importance of personal freedom, while longtime physicians recalled hospital wards full of gravely sick children in the years before the widespread availability of vaccines.

When pediatrician Paul Robinson trained at Vanderbilt University in the 1980s, he cared for countless children “suffering from diseases we now prevent,” including Hib.

“It didn't cause mild illness. It caused children to die,” Robinson said, recalling the survivors who were left with “deafness, paralysis or lifelong neurologic injury.”

The policy being pushed by the state's surgeon general is “dangerous,” he added.

Jamie Schanbaum's legs and fingers were amputated after she contracted meningitis as a 20-year-old college student in Texas. She traveled from Brooklyn, New York, to testify in support of vaccines, recounting her seven-month hospital stay as she battled the vaccine-preventable disease and the challenges of living without her limbs.


“No one should go through this experience,” Schanbaum said.

“How about the relearning to use my hands? Feed myself? Wipe myself? This is the reality of what it’s like to survive something like this,” she added.

Rise of vaccine skepticism

Vaccination efforts across the country and around the world have stalled in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, which saw an explosion in vaccine skepticism. Florida's proposal comes as U.S. Department of Health Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has worked to reshape the nation’s vaccine policies to match his long-standing suspicions about the safety and effectiveness of well-established shots.

Mary Helms, a mother and grandmother from Apalachicola, Florida, referenced Kennedy as she voiced her “full support” for rolling back the mandates.

“Medical choice and medical freedom in all ways is a God-given and sovereign human right,” Helms said.


Susan Sweetin's voiced filled with emotion as she described her then-newborn son being rushed off for a hepatitis B shot that she said “injured” him. Sweetin is a marketing executive for the National Vaccine Information Center, a group connected to Kennedy.

“This is not informed consent. That is coercion. Vaccines should never be tied to a child’s education,” Sweetin said.

Asked if the state consulted national medical experts such as the American Academy of Pediatrics on the rule development, a department representative declined to answer directly, stating: “the rule language is grounded in policy based on considerations that favor parental rights and medical freedom.”

Measles outbreak in South Carolina

Florida's push comes as a monthslong measles outbreak continues in South Carolina, almost entirely among school-age children.

State health officials there have said 116 of the 126 cases have been in children under 18, with two-thirds of them in children from age 5 to 17.


The outbreak has been centered in Spartanburg County, where just 90% of students have all the vaccinees required to be in school — one of the lowest rates in South Carolina. The state has a religious exemption for vaccines, and almost all of the unvaccinated students use it.

___

Associated Press writer Jeffrey Collins contributed from Columbia, South Carolina. Kate Payne is a corps member for The Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues.

Kate Payne, The Associated Press
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
87,113
133,432
113
US admiral leading US troops in Latin America steps down


MIAMI, Dec 12 (Reuters) - The admiral in charge of U.S. military forces in Latin America retired two years early on Friday, amid rising tensions with Venezuela that include Wednesday's seizure of an oil tanker and more than 20 deadly strikes on suspected drug-smuggling boats.

more

Three U.S. officials and two people familiar with the matter told Reuters that Admiral Alvin Holsey was pushed out by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. Two officials said Hegseth had grown frustrated with Southern Command as he sought to flex U.S. military operations and planning in the region.

One official confirmed that discussion of whether Hegseth would dismiss Holsey surfaced roughly two weeks before the surprise announcement of his departure.

Holsey announced on October 16 his intention to step down in December.

He has not publicly explained his early retirement. In remarks at his retirement ceremony on Friday morning, he was upbeat as he reflected on his 37-year-long career. Speaking between rows of palm trees at Southern Command headquarters in Miami, he called on the United States to keep standing by fellow democracies that share U.S. values.


"We must always be there for like-minded partners, like-minded nations who share our values: democracy, rule of law and human rights," Holsey said.

Some officials have privately speculated that he opposed the recent U.S. strikes on suspected drug vessels in the Caribbean. However, in a closed-door meeting with senior lawmakers on Tuesday, Holsey insisted that his decision had nothing to do with the operations in his command, according to comments by Republican Representative Mike Rogers published in Politico.

Holsey formally handed over command to his deputy, Air Force Lieutenant General Evan Pettus, during a ceremony that extolled his accomplishments in uniform.

"You're an extraordinary human who has always led with your heart, your head and gone all in (for) every single day of your service," said General Dan Caine, who became the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff in April after his predecessor was fired.

Pettus will serve as acting head of U.S. Southern Command.

One source familiar with the matter said President Donald Trump is expected to nominate Lieutenant General Frank Donovan, vice commander of U.S. Special Operations Command, as Holsey’s successor, subject to Senate confirmation. The source cautioned that the nomination has not yet been formalized and could change.

Holsey's premature retirement is rare but not unprecedented. In 2008, Central Command commander Admiral William Fallon also retired a year into his term overseeing U.S. forces in the Middle East after making comments about Iran and other issues that irked the Bush administration.


more

Holsey is the latest in a series of senior officers to leave their positions since Hegseth took over the Pentagon. Some departures have been abrupt, including those of the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, C.Q. Brown, and the top naval officer, Lisa Franchetti, who was the first woman to hold that post.

MONROE DOCTRINE REVIVAL?

The Trump administration has signalled a major shift in foreign policy over the last few months. A strategy document released this week called for reviving the 19th-century Monroe Doctrine, which declared the Western Hemisphere to be Washington's zone of influence.

A major U.S. military buildup of warships in the Caribbean - including the deployment of an aircraft carrier strike group - has underscored that policy shift, along with new U.S. training deployments to a revived jungle school in Panama.

Trump has also intensified pressure on Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, a close ally of Russia and China whom Washington accuses of drug trafficking. Maduro denies the allegations and has said the U.S. military buildup aims to topple him and seize Venezuela's oil resources.


The U.S. Coast Guard's seizure of an oil tanker on Wednesday was the first interdiction of Venezuelan crude amid U.S. sanctions that have been in force since 2019. Reuters reported on Thursday that the United States is preparing to intercept more ships carrying Venezuelan oil.

Trump's military operations against alleged drug smugglers have been under intense scrutiny following a September 2 decision to launch a second strike on a suspected drug boat in the Caribbean.

The Defense Department's Law of War Manual forbids attacks on combatants who are incapacitated, unconscious or shipwrecked, as long as they abstain from hostilities and do not attempt to escape. The manual cites firing upon shipwreck survivors as an example of a "clearly illegal" order that should be refused.

The Trump administration has framed the attacks as a war with drug cartels, calling them armed groups and saying the drugs being carried to the United States kill Americans.

(Reporting by Phil Stewart in Miami; Additional reporting by Idrees Ali in Washington; Editing by Ros Russell and Matthew Lewis)
 
  • Wow
Reactions: SchlongConery

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
87,113
133,432
113
Why applicants for Trump immigration 'Gold Cards' could be out $1M


The Trump administration this week launched the president’s immigration “gold card,” a program allowing applicants to pay $1 million to become lawful permanent residents, but legal experts warn all that money could go down the drain for these hopefuls because the initiative rests on flawed legal reasoning and could be struck down in court.


Other Trump tweaks to the immigration system like a new $100,000 fee for H-1B applicants have already spawned major lawsuits, and if the gold card melts down in a court battle, applicants would face a slim chance of ever getting their money back, Shev Dalal-Dheini, senior director of government relations at the American Immigration Lawyers Association, told Axios.

“At the very minimum, they’d have to sue the U.S. government to get it back,” she said.

In addition to applicants being out $1 million, a court challenge could also imperil the status of people who have already gotten their gold cards.

Critics warn that the gold card program, which gives applicants permanent residency through EB-1 and EB-2 visas usually reserved for people with extraordinary abilities like famous academics or artists, exceeds the president’s legal powers. Congress, they say, can create new immigration law, not the president.

Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, a senior fellow at the American Immigration Council, called the whole process “VERY illegal” in a post on X this week.

“The Trump admin says anyone who pays $1 million will be deemed to have ‘exceptional business ability’ and become eligible for an employment-based immigrant visa,” he wrote. “But there's nothing stopping someone from just getting a loan or using parents' money.”

“Of course, nothing exemplifies the Trump ethos more than ‘every rich person is exceptional at business,’” he added, “but that doesn't change the fact that people who are getting this visa will not necessarily meet the legal requirements, and could risk deportation under a future admin.”

The Independent has contacted the White House and State Department for comment.



After an Afghan national allegedly shot two National Guard troops in Washington, D.C. last month, the Trump administration furthered tightened access to the immigration system for applicants from a variety of countries (Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.)
Legal concerns aside, the administration looks set to continue tilting the immigration system away from the most vulnerable and toward the wealthiest applicants.

The White House says a $5 million “platinum card” is on the way giving foreigners temporary residence in the U.S. without being subject to U.S. taxes on foreign income.

After an Afghan national allegedly shot National Guard troops in Washington, the administration froze all asylum decisions, ordered the review of green cards from a series of mostly impoverished nations on his so-called travel ban list, and indefinitely blocked immigration applications from Afghans.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: SchlongConery

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
87,113
133,432
113
Trump's DOJ sues Georgia's Fulton County for 2020 voting records amid president's fixation


The Department of Justice's Civil Rights Division announced a lawsuit against a Georgia county, where President Donald Trump faced charges for election interference until recently.

In a statement on Friday, the DOJ said it was suing Fulton County in Georgia, along with four states — Colorado, Hawaii, Massachusetts, and Nevada — for voting records from the 2020 election. Trump lost in all of the localities that were sued.


"States have the statutory duty to preserve and protect their constituents from vote dilution," Assistant Attorney General Harmeet K. Dhillon said in a statement. "At this Department of Justice, we will not permit states to jeopardize the integrity and effectiveness of elections by refusing to abide by our federal elections laws. If states will not fulfill their duty to protect the integrity of the ballot, we will."

Trump has long claimed that the 2020 election was rigged against him.


An October subpoena demanded "all used and void ballots, stubs of all ballots, signature envelopes, and corresponding envelope digital files" from Fulton County.

According to the complaint, the Fulton County Clerk's office has not responded to the subpoena.
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
87,113
133,432
113
Kristi Noem recommends full travel ban


Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said she is recommending a sweeping travel ban on countries she claims pose a threat to the United States, following a deadly attack near the White House that has intensified scrutiny of immigration and national security policies.


Noem’s remarks came after President Donald Trump directed a reexamination of green cards issued to individuals from 19 countries, part of a broader shift in the administration’s immigration stance. The move follows a recent shooting in Washington, D.C., involving an Afghan immigrant who left two National Guard members shot, one fatally. In a recent post to X, Noem said, “I just met with the President. I am recommending a full travel ban on every damn country that's been flooding our nation with killers, leeches, and entitlement junkies. Our forefathers built this nation on blood, sweat and the unyielding love of freedom — not for foreign invaders to slaughter our heroes, suck dry our hard-earned tax dollars, or snatch the benefits owed to AMERICANS. WE DON'T WANT THEM. NOT ONE.”

When contacted for comment on the post and which countries could be affected, the Department of Homeland Security told Newsweek that it “will be announcing the list soon.” It remained unclear at the time of publication what Noem meant by a “full travel ban” or how such a policy would be implemented.

The recommendation comes amid growing debate over border security, refugee admissions and immigration vetting procedures. Tensions have escalated following the fatal shooting of National Guard member Sarah Beckstrom and the critical wounding of Staff Sergeant Andrew Wolfe on November 26. According to authorities, the suspect, Rahmanullah Lakanwal, entered the United States in 2021 through a humanitarian resettlement program for Afghans who assisted U.S. forces and was granted asylum earlier this year by the Trump administration.


President Trump addressed the issue in a post on Truth Social, writing in part: “I will permanently pause migration from all Third World Countries to allow the U.S. system to fully recover, terminate all of the millions of Biden illegal admissions, including those signed by Sleepy Joe Biden's Autopen, and remove anyone who is not a net asset to the United States.” Following the president’s announcement, DHS and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services halted all Afghan immigration processing and launched a “full-scale, rigorous reexamination” of green card holders from 19 countries, including Afghanistan, Haiti, Iran, Somalia, Sudan, Yemen, Venezuela and others.
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
26,208
4,225
113
DOJ seeks to oust judge ahead of DHS contempt hearing: report


The Department of Justice (DOJ) filed paperwork on Friday seeking the ouster of U.S. District Judge James Boasberg before he can hold a contempt hearing aimed at Department of Homeland Security officials who ignored his legal directive on deportations.

At the center of the dispute is Boasberg ordering DHS to halt deportation flights containing immigrants months ago, which was ignored by Donald Trump administration officials. DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, in recent days, said she overruled the judge.



Noem, who was grilled mercilessly by Democrats in a hearing on Thursday that concluded when she walked out on questions by claiming she had to get to a meeting that had already been cancelled, is at the center of next week's court hearing.

According to a report from The Hill, Attorney Pam Bondi's DOJ is asserting that there is a “strong appearance that the district judge is engaged in a pattern of retaliation and harassment, and has developed too strong a bias to preside over this matter impartially.”


The filing contends, “This long-running saga never should have begun; should not have continued at all after this Court’s last intervention; and certainly should not be allowed to escalate into the unseemly and unnecessary interbranch conflict that it now imminently portends.”

Boasberg is expected to hear testimony from former DOJ employee Erez Reuveni, who turned whistleblower about the refusal to halt flights that took more than 100 Venezuelans to a high-security prison in El Salvador, where Noem notoriously had her photo taken in front of prisoners at a later date.

According to the Hill, “The testimony will inform Boasberg as he considers referring Trump administration officials for criminal contempt after finding his March order to turn around deportation flights being carried out under the AEA was violated.”

You can read more here.
NOEM is a ewffing loony. I hope she end up in jail or sued into oblivion.
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
87,113
133,432
113
Justice Department asks appeals court to block judge's contempt inquiry in mass deportation case


WASHINGTON (AP) — The Justice Department asked an appeals court Friday to block a contempt investigation of the Trump administration for failing to turn around planes carrying Venezuelan migrants to El Salvador in March.

The department also is seeking Chief Judge James Boasberg’s removal from the case, accusing him of a “radical, retaliatory, unconstitutional campaign” against the Trump administration.


It marks a dramatic escalation in the Justice Department’s lengthy feud with the judge appointed to the bench by Democratic President Barack Obama, setting the stage for a showdown over the judiciary’s power to serve as a check on an administration that has pushed the boundaries of court orders.

The department asked the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit to rule on its requests before Monday, when Boasberg is scheduled to hear testimony from a former government attorney who filed a whistleblower complaint.

A three-judge panel from the appeals court agreed to temporarily suspend Boasberg's contempt-related order. The panel, composed of two judges nominated by Trump and one nominated by Democratic President Joe Biden, said its administrative stay isn't a ruling on the merits of the government's requests. But it casts some doubt on whether Monday's hearing will proceed as planned.


Department officials claim Boasberg is biased and creating "a circus that threatens the separation of powers and the attorney-client privilege alike.”

“The forthcoming hearing has every appearance of an endless fishing expedition aimed at an ever-widening list of witnesses and prolonged testimony. That spectacle is not a genuine effort to uncover any relevant facts,” they wrote.


Boasberg has said that a recent ruling by the appeals court gave him the authority to proceed with the contempt inquiry. The judge is trying determine if there is sufficient evidence to refer the matter for prosecution.

Boasberg, who has been chief judge of the district court in Washington, D.C., since March 2023, has said the Trump administration may have “acted in bad faith” by trying to rush Venezuelan migrants out of the country in defiance of his order blocking their deportations to El Salvador.

In an April 16 order, the judge said he gave the administration “ample opportunity to rectify or explain their actions" but concluded that “none of their responses has been satisfactory."

“The Constitution does not tolerate willful disobedience of judicial orders — especially by officials of a coordinate branch who have sworn an oath to uphold it,” Boasberg wrote.

The Trump administration has denied any violation, saying the judge’s March 15 directive to return the planes was made verbally in court but not included in his written order.

Trump called for impeaching Boasberg in March. In July, the Justice Department filed a misconduct complaint accusing Boasberg of making improper public comments about Trump and his administration.

In a social media post Friday, Attorney General Pam Bondi accused Boasberg of engaging in “lawless judicial activism.”

“This radical, retaliatory, unconstitutional campaign against the Trump Administration will not stand,” Bondi wrote.

Boasberg has scheduled a hearing Monday for testimony by former Justice Department attorney Erez Reuveni, whose whistleblower complaint claims a top department official suggested the Trump administration might have to ignore court orders as it prepared to deport Venezuelan migrants.


The judge also scheduled a hearing Tuesday for testimony by Deputy Assistant Attorney General Drew Ensign. The Justice Department has said Ensign conveyed Boasberg’s March 15 oral order and a subsequent written order to the Department of Homeland Security.

“This long-running saga never should have begun; should not have continued at all after this Court’s last intervention; and certainly should not be allowed to escalate into the unseemly and unnecessary interbranch conflict that it now imminently portends,” department officials said in Friday's court filing.

In a written declaration to the court, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said she made the decision not to return the planes to the U.S. after receiving “privileged legal advice” from the Homeland Security Department’s acting general counsel and “through him from the senior leadership of the Department of Justice.”


Boasberg called Noem’s declaration “cursory” and said it doesn't provide him with enough information to determine whether she willfully violated his March 15 order.

Boasberg on Friday refused to cancel or delay next week’s hearings.

“To begin, this inquiry is not some academic exercise,” he wrote. “Approximately 137 men were spirited out of this country without a hearing and placed in a high-security prison in El Salvador, where many suffered abuse and possible torture, despite this Court’s order that they should not be disembarked.”

Michael Kunzelman, The Associated Press
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
87,113
133,432
113
Danish intelligence report warns of US military threat under Trump


COPENHAGEN, Denmark (AP) — The United States is using its economic power to “assert its will" and threaten military force against friend and foe alike, a Danish intelligence agency said in a new report.

The Danish Defense Intelligence Service, in its latest annual assessment, said Washington's greater assertiveness under the Trump administration also comes as China and Russia seek to diminish Western, especially American, influence.


Perhaps most sensitive to Denmark — a NATO and European Union member country, and a U.S. ally — is growing competition between those great powers in the Arctic. U.S. President Donald Trump has expressed a desire to see Greenland, a semiautonomous and mineral-rich territory of Denmark, become part of the United States, a move opposed by Russia and much of Europe.

“The strategic importance of the Arctic is rising as the conflict between Russia and the West intensifies, and the growing security and strategic focus on the Arctic by the United States will further accelerate these developments,” said the report, published Wednesday.

The assessment also follows the release last week of a new Trump administration national security strategy that depicts European allies as weak and aims to reassert America’s dominance in the Western Hemisphere.

Russian President Vladimir Putin has said Russia is worried about NATO’s activities in the Arctic and will respond by strengthening its military capability in the polar region.

The findings and analyses in the report echo a string of recent concerns, notably in Western Europe, about an increasingly go-it-alone approach by the United States, which under Trump's second term has favored bilateral deals and partnerships at the expense of multilateral alliances like NATO.

“For many countries outside the West, it has become a viable option to forge strategic agreements with China rather than the United States,” read the report, which was written in Danish. “China and Russia, together with other like-minded states, are seeking to reduce Western – and particularly US – global influence.”

“At the same time, uncertainty has grown over how the United States will prioritize its resources in the future,” it added. “This gives regional powers greater room for maneuver, enabling them to choose between the United States and China or to strike a balance between the two.”

The Trump administration has raised concerns about respect for international law with its series of deadly strikes on alleged drug-smuggling boats in the Caribbean Sea and eastern Pacific Ocean — part of a stepped-up pressure campaign against President Nicolás Maduro of Venezuela.

Trump has also refused to rule out military force in Greenland, where the United States already has a military base.

“The United States is leveraging economic power, including threats of high tariffs, to assert its will, and the possibility of employing military force – even against allies – is no longer ruled out,” the report said.

The Associated Press
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
87,113
133,432
113
Trump defends pardoning convicted drug trafficker


President Donald Trump was recently pressed by a reporter regarding his decision to pardon former Honduran president Juan Orlando Hernandez, a convicted drug trafficker serving a 45-year sentence.

Knewz.com has learned that the exchange unfolded aboard Air Force One, where Trump praised his own anti-drug policies while simultaneously defending the pardon.

Reporters question Trump about the pardon


During a Q&A session with the press, a reporter asked Trump about his decision to free a man convicted in a U.S. federal court of trafficking tons of cocaine into the country, while touting his tough-on-drugs rhetoric.

“You have made so clear how you want to keep drugs out of the U.S. Can you explain more about why you would pardon a notorious drug trafficker?” the reporter asked.

Trump initially responded, “Well, I don’t know who you’re talking about,” prompting the reporter to clarify, “Juan Orlando Hernandez.”

Hernandez, Honduras’ president from 2014 to 2022, was convicted in New York last year on drug trafficking and weapons charges.


The victim of political 'setup'

Trump defended the pardon by insisting that Hernandez had been unfairly targeted.

“I was told – I was asked by Honduras, many of the people of Honduras, they said it was a Biden setup,” Trump said.

He added, “I don’t mean Biden – look, Biden didn’t know he was alive, but it was the people that surround the Resolute Desk, surround Biden when he was there, which was about very little time, and the people of Honduras really thought he was set up and it was a terrible thing.”

According to Trump, Hondurans told him Hernandez was accused simply because “he was the president of the country.”

He said he “looked at the facts” and agreed with those asserting the prosecution was politically motivated, a claim at odds with a lengthy Justice Department case that involved cooperating witnesses, intercepted communications and detailed trafficking evidence.


Trump fails to provide specific evidence of political setup

Trump provided no specifics when asked, “What evidence can you share that he was set up?”

Instead, he replied, “Well, you take a look. I mean, they could say that you take any country you want, if somebody sells drugs in that country, that doesn’t mean you arrest the president and put him in jail for the rest of his life.”

However, it is worth noting that prosecutors accused Hernandez not of failing to prevent trafficking, but of actively enabling it.

Federal officials said he accepted millions in bribes from cartels while presenting himself as a U.S. ally.

Trump celebrates pardon on Truth Social

Trump first announced the pardon on Truth Social, writing, “I will be granting a Full and Complete Pardon to Former President Juan Orlando Hernandez who has been, according to many people that I greatly respect, treated very harshly and unfairly. CONGRATULATIONS TO JUAN ORLANDO HERNANDEZ ON YOUR UPCOMING PARDON.”
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
87,113
133,432
113
Trump ally Alina Habba panics as president's picks resign


Donald Trump's own nominees are being forced to resign, and it's causing the president's former lawyer, herself an appointee, to panic Friday.

Julianne Murray, Trump's Acting US Attorney for the District of Delaware and Special Attorney to the United States Attorney General, announced her resignation early on Friday. She specifically said that she "naively believed" that Trump would be able to keep her in place.



"Unfortunately, that was not the case," she said. "The highly politicized, flawed blue slip tradition is costing Delaware a U.S. Attorney and is affecting the country as a whole."

She added, "Senator Coons and Senator Blunt Rochester refused to return a blue slip for political reasons, not performance reasons."

"This is not about advice and consent," she added. "Because of this incredibly flawed tradition, I wasn't even considered..."

Trump himself has railed against the blue slip tradition, which allows local lawmakers of the opposing party to weigh in on appointees in their regions, but this particular resignation made Habba raise an alarm.


"Another resignation from a well qualified US Attorney. This should not be happening," Habba said. "Julianne Murray was President Trump’s pick as US Attorney and served Delaware with dignity and focus on one mission- taking down crime."

Habb further added, "The political machine is attempting to erode the basic principals of our Department of Justice and separation of powers due to a broken tradition in Senate and rogue judges in blue states. Enough is enough!"
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
87,113
133,432
113
Trump's legal losing streak is forcing him to scramble before 'the game is over': report


Donald Trump faces mounting obstacles in his strategy to place loyalists in U.S. Attorney positions without Senate approval, prompting the normally stubborn and confrontational president to explore alternative approaches.

According to reporting from Politico's Erica Orden, the resignation of Trump appointee Alina Habba signals that the administration recognizes its legal position has weakened and may be reluctant to pursue the matter before the Supreme Court.

Habba, a former personal attorney to the president who represented him when he lost two defamation lawsuits filed by writer E. Jean Carroll, stepped down this week following a court ruling that deemed her appointment unlawful. In her statement, she explained, "As a result of the Third Circuit's ruling, and to protect the stability and integrity of the office which I love, I have decided to step down in my role as the U.S. Attorney for the District of New Jersey."

Delaware U.S. Attorney Julianne Murray subsequently resigned, also citing the Habba ruling as her reason for stepping down.

Legal experts indicate the administration faces a difficult calculus moving forward. Carl Tobias, a law professor at the University of Richmond, outlined the administration's limited options when speaking with Politico: suggesting they could "...continue to try to install temporary U.S. attorneys, only to repeatedly have those choices disqualified by courts, or attempt the traditional process of Senate confirmation."

Tobias suggested the White House may be hesitant to escalate the matter to the Supreme Court, noting, "I think the last thing they want is to have the Supreme Court say no, right? Because then the game is over. ... they can continue to do what they've been doing, and that is avoiding advice and consent, which is in the Constitution, which they've done in more than half the districts, and continue to play games with the system."

Nina Mendelson, a professor at the University of Michigan Law School, cautioned that a Supreme Court decision could cut either way, with potential long-term implications. She wrote in an email to Politico, "If [the administration] does appeal, the Supreme Court may, on the one hand, be interested in preserving the Senate's constitutional function of advice and consent and thus narrowly interpret the President's authority to appoint acting US Attorneys. On the other hand, the Supreme Court has, in a series of cases, expressed its concern for presidential control and flexibility, which might prompt it to more generously interpret the President's power."

You can read more here.
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
87,113
133,432
113
Pete Hegseth just committed the 'worst-case scenario' offense: military justice group


U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth was condemned on Friday by a non-governmental group of military justice experts who said he had committed the "worst-case scenario."

NIMJ, which bills itself as "the only non-governmental organization in the United States to educate about and encourage a fair court-martial and military justice system," issued a press release ahead of the weekend addressing a recent scandal from Hegseth. Specifically, the group said it "condemns any attempt by military leaders to punish Senator Mark Kelly, a military retiree, for his speech" in connection with a video he and other veterans made for members of the military.


"Any adverse action against Senator Kelly would threaten core constitutional principles. It blurs the separation of powers by allowing the Executive Branch to punish a member of the Legislative Branch for speech made in the performance of his duties as a Senator," according to the group. "Any adverse action chills First Amendment expression. When military leaders punish speech they do not like, they send a message that honest debate invites retaliation. Service members quickly learn that loyalty to the Constitution may carry risk if their words displease those in power. If the military can punish a Senator for speech that a senior military official does not like, no viewpoint of any military member or retiree is safe."

The group further added, "Senator Kelly’s speech is not punishable under the UCMJ. Although the military code criminalizes certain types of speech that may affect the military mission, the Senator’s remarks are far from criminal. He simply restated a fundamental principle of military law: service members must obey lawful orders and disobey unlawful orders," the group wrote before concluding, "Finally, the process here was flawed from the start. Secretary Hegseth first publicly announced that he wanted to punish Senator Kelly for his speech, then sent the case to a subordinate leader for his independent decision. That puts the subordinate in an impossible position: either deliver some form of punishment that Secretary Hegseth demands or potentially be fired. That is not how justice in the military works or should work."


Legal expert Ryan Goodman quoted the release, "Secretary Hegseth’s zeal to have the military punish Senator Kelly is a worst-case scenario of this problem," and then added, "National Institute of Military Justice Statement Against Secretary Hegseth’s Threats to Punish a Senator (disclaimer: I am a NIMJ Distinguished Fellow)."
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
87,113
133,432
113
Trump performs historically bad in new poll


Donald Trump’s job approval sank to 36 percent in a Gallup survey, a second-term low that leaves his net approval at -24 points, a level that CNN’s chief data analyst Harry Enten called “a disaster” if it holds toward next year’s midterm elections.

Trump’s historically low standing
Gallup reported that 36% of U.S. adults approve of the job Trump is doing while 60% disapprove.

Enten, speaking with anchor Sara Sidner on CNN News Central, described the numbers as “a disaster if it holds towards the midterm elections.”

He noted that Trump’s net approval had slipped from minus one point in January 2025 to minus 24 points.

“This is Gallup, this is the longest-running poll,” Enten said.

“Look at this now, negative 24 points. Way, way down! We’re talking about a drop of over 20 points in the wrong direction for the president of the United States.”

He also stressed that the poll's findings were consistent with other surveys, explaining, “It matches the trend that we’ve seen with other polls. That is, Donald Trump hitting his low for the second term. I think we’re up to 10 polls in sort of the last 40 days, 10 different pollsters who have said that Trump is at the lowest point he is in his second term.”

Comparisons to past presidents


George W. Bush’s -19 net approval in 2006 preceded a Democratic wave that flipped both chambers of Congress, a parallel Enten highlighted.By: Alex Wong - Pool via CNP / MEGA© Knewz (CA)
Enten placed the Gallup result in historical context on air: among two-term presidents at a comparable point in their second term, only Richard Nixon which was -36 in Gallup-era comparison and Trump’s ranks among the very weakest readings since the 1940s.

Enten added that Trump’s numbers were also weaker than those of Harry S. Truman, Lyndon B. Johnson, Barack Obama and Bill Clinton, noting, “Anywhere you look, this is the second worst for a president of either party at this point in their second term, dating all the way back since the 1940s.”


Broader polling trends
The New York Times’ polling aggregator currently places Trump’s average disapproval rating at 55 percent, with multiple pollsters projecting that Democrats are positioned to retake control of Congress in the 2026 midterms.

Even McLaughlin and Associates, a firm often cited by Trump as favorable, has warned that Republicans are losing ground among independent voters.

Trump’s response
Despite the data, Trump has rejected the unfavorable polling. On Truth Social, he wrote, “So many Fake Polls are being shown by the Radical Left Media…Fake News will never change.”

In another post, Trump claimed he had his “highest Poll Numbers, ever,” contradicting Gallup’s report that his approval rating had reached its lowest point since the aftermath of the January 6 Capitol riots, when Gallup recorded him at 34 percent approval.

In 2006, Bush’s low approval coincided with Democrats gaining control of both chambers of Congress. Nixon’s collapse in support preceded his resignation in 1974.

With Republicans holding only a narrow majority in the House, Gallup’s findings highlight the risks facing the party as it heads into the 2026 midterms.
 
Toronto Escorts