10 stupidest technology blunders

Cobster

New member
Apr 29, 2002
10,420
0
0
http://www.pcworld.com/article/170337/the_10_stupidest_tech_company_blunders.html


...and here I thought Apple invented the iPod when in fact it wasn't really their idea, but rather it was pitched to them by someone who pitched it to Real Networks beforehand and they didn't run with it.

CompuServ did blow it big time as well, I remember them very well back in 1996.

Napster revolutionized the online music industry in 1999.

Microsoft saved a rotting Apple, I wonder if they regret helping them out? lol
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,881
197
63
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
Three great examples of Jobs seeing an opportunity and executing on it..... just like today really....

OTB
 

Cobster

New member
Apr 29, 2002
10,420
0
0
Zero points for imagination or creativity.
But thankfully, good ol' Gates was there to give him some cash.
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,881
197
63
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
Zero points for imagination or creativity.
But thankfully, good ol' Gates was there to give him some cash.
I think you're being a bit harsh, of the 10 stupidest tech decisions and Jobs comes out on the sunny side of 3 of them... you have to give him credit. It wasn't him who drove Apple into the ground, it was he who resurrected it. M$ was so worried about their anti-trust issues they wanted to fund a competitor less their monopoly be taken away.

OTB
 

Cobster

New member
Apr 29, 2002
10,420
0
0
Not harsh, realistic. I honestly thought the iPod was Jobs' baby but when I read it was someone else's idea I thought "wow, really? lol".
So it was a smart move on their part (M$'s). Afterall, they're still in tact, dominate the world in PC market use and sit on a lot of a cash with a nice profit.
I'm not their biggest fan, but, nice move on their part helping Apple out, for their own sake. :)
 

Anynym

Just a bit to the right
Dec 28, 2005
2,953
6
38
Poor reporting.

1. Facebook may have a paper worth of several billion dollars, but that's all it is. There is no analyst who is going to say they could raise anywhere near that kind of money in an IPO, and no CEO in their right mind would pay that much cash for them.

2. The iPod wasn't the first mp3 player (as correctly indicated). But that doesn't mean that the utter simplicity of the user interface was perfected when the idea was pitched to Real.

3. There is no reason to believe that a combined HD-DVD/Blu-Ray standard would sell any more discs than they do today. They're simply priced above the price point which consumers are willing to pay.

4. As the article says, who knows what would have happened. Again, price drove the market, not the vendor selection.

5. The Apple Lisa was an utter failure. The success of the Mac had a lot to do with its compact packaging; the user interface was novel but not exactly ideal. The difference between Apple and XEROX was in their sales channels: Apple had established computer vendors through its Apple ][ products. XEROX PARC hadn't commercialized many technologies and didn't have computer sales channels established.

6. Pure speculation. Well, since they don't actually suggest an outcome, it's really just speculating that others can speculate. Solid stuff, there.

7. Both AOL and CompuServe offered a closed model. Both are complete failures. The problem with both of them was that they were trying to offer Internet access (and limited Internet services) without owning any of the last-mile infrastructure. The only successful players in that industry today (think Rogers, Bell, etc) own the wires and phone towers that connect you to the web.

8. The Print Media have a lot of problems today; the existence of CraigsList isn't among their bigger problems. (They do still make a lot of money off of ads. Free newspapers make all their money from ads, and have proliferated in the past few years.)

9. It's not that Search is so big. It's that there's money to be made from paid search (i.e. placing results from paying advertisers) and from placing ads with search results. Search was a big money loser until Google figured out how to save space on the page for ads.

10. If MS hadn't saved Apple, it's quite possible that Jobs would still have seen the promise of the iPod and taken it to other VCs in the valley.
 

djk

Active member
Apr 8, 2002
5,937
0
36
the hobby needs more capitalism
Three great examples of Jobs seeing an opportunity and executing on it..... just like today really....

OTB
Also the majority of Apple's decline happened while Jobs wasn't at the helm. The board kicked him out in 1985. He returned in 1996.
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,881
197
63
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
Also the majority of Apple's decline happened while Jobs wasn't at the helm. The board kicked him out in 1985. He returned in 1996.
I don't know, ending up on the winning side of 3 of the 10 dumbest things in the tech industry looks to me to be more than a coincidence, add to that his Pixar investment and you'd be a poor man betting against Jobs..... Ask Michael Dell.

OTB
 

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
47,064
6,196
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net
Enjoy your bubble......before it pops!....
 

zorlack

New member
Jul 7, 2010
230
0
0
Microsoft saved a rotting Apple, I wonder if they regret helping them out? lol
Government & education bailed out Apple too right? my uncle was a highschool teacher, and always got big discounts on Apple junk.

I think IBM likely holds the heavyweight belt for a tech blunder, well more accurately patent blunder...they did not go apeshit makin everything proprietary as Apple did with their junk...as a result PC clones exploded onto the scene in the mid to late 80's...and that is the reason for the giant technology boom...if not for that simple fact, I think it is highly unlikely that the internet would be what it is today...nor would MP3, PDF, AVI have exploded onto the scene and fueled the need to create broadband and the wide array of devices to record, store, and playback the media.

Heck if not for PC clones, the more advanced models of Atari & Commodore platforms might have had staying power.

later
 

blackrock13

Banned
Jun 6, 2009
40,049
1
0
Depending how you want to define technology or what the purpose behind this thread, but screwing around with flavour of Coke, my bad, is considered one of the biggest blunders in the world.
 
Last edited:

zorlack

New member
Jul 7, 2010
230
0
0
I think it is good that there are so many Linux distros.

Also so many PC-clones...people are free to choose from a wide variety, or build their own from scratch...choice is good.

cheers!
 

sleazure

Active member
Aug 30, 2001
4,090
23
38
If Microsoft hadn't missed its opportunity to let Apple wither? We'd be struggling to play WinTunes on our WinPhones.
I'm not convince that this was a blunder. If it was good for the industry, then it was good for µSoft, too.

Or, if you want to be really cynical about it, this gave them someone to look up to, and something to imitate.
 
Toronto Escorts