There you go, Phil. So let me ask you Phil, are you morally bankrupt?Gotta love how the goal posts have changed in the modern era. So we have a woman that is in Tate's house and she can come and go as she pleases from the house which has 24/7 camera surveillance. Her job is voluntary - to be on a webcam, if she so chooses. Yet this somehow makes Tate a "violent pimp". (based on Tate's side, we know nothing yet of what the officials have on him and what is presented in court)
You have supported ACTUAL pimps here in Toronto by being a fucking John. You know, people that compel women to have SEX with men for money. That's pimping.(based on Mandy's posts he only seems to see reliable agencies girls and veteran indies so why accuse one of supporting pimps unless you are ready to brandish the agencies here on this forum as pimps )
I get the feeling that you don't have the slightest clue how the webcamming business works, nor business in general. Recall how Twitter was supposed to collapse within a week after firing all the excess fat on the payroll?
Stop projecting your own rotten core onto others. If you had half the ability and ambition as Tate, you'd have a different take on the matter.
All the Johns on Terb are morally bankrupt compared to Tate. You participate in an industry known for abuses and trafficking while you pay to have sex with women whose backgrounds you know nothing about. Tate employs women to go on a webcam of their own volition yet he's the monster. (if that is how one feels why are you on this forum exactly? Obviously, if you post here you are also a user of pay for play at some point)
Get over yourself. People like you are the real threat.
Has he said anything that isnt true though??