tboy said:
Well, ok, so let me get this straight. You want someone's opinion who has no direct scientific knowledge instead of an agency whose sole job is to produce these guidelines and if they are incorrect, face severe risk via lawsuits?
LOL Yes, by all means, the government can do no wrong. Unless of course they are unionized.
Look at it this way g_27, eat it and you'll never know if the toxic chemicals have an effect on you. So maybe you'll get cancer (statistically you have a fairly good chance of getting it) 20 or 30 years from now. Did you get it because you ate a fish 30 years ago? Not likely.
Did you get it because you repeated made decisions in your life that exposed you to toxic chemicals? Perhaps partly. Let's face it, there are toxic chemicals all over the place, even in Inuit mother's breast milk. Its a judgement call how you want to live your life, but for sure you can to some degree control how many chemicals you are exposed to over your life time. And these chemicals are largely responsible for the skyrocketing cancer rates. But please keep in mind that the government is under a lot of industry pressure (tourism, fisheries) to manipulate regulations that so that people can eat fish "safely." And they will never get sued for it because it is impossible to prove.
gardener_27 said:
That's why I am asking here. I want a truthful answer, not a politically correct one.
g_27
I think there are many different truths, aka opinions. You will have to educate yourself about environmental toxins and decide for yourself what or who to believe.