Bear Stearns is toasted

Hank Reardon

New member
Dec 26, 2007
331
0
0
BottomsUp said:
This case may very well be bs, however there were plenty of put buyers on Bear, and they'll all make a kiliing on this.
I agree but there are not that many buying lots of puts 12 dollars out on a put that expires in 7 trading days.Other than insider shit , and they go to jail
 

BottomsUp

New member
Aug 30, 2004
1,815
0
0
Hank Reardon said:
I agree but there are not that many buying lots of puts 12 dollars out on a put that expires in 7 trading days.Other than insider shit , and they go to jail
Well, actually there were 47,712 March 20 put contracts traded just on Friday. I'd say thats pretty high volume, and thats just on one strike price.
 

landscaper

New member
Feb 28, 2007
5,752
0
0
bear stearns was one of the big five new york banks that was packaging low interest and negative interest loans with credit card debt etc that fueled the you can buy it but we know you cant pay for it housing in the states . They hit a credit crunch when nobody would but the packages for the last few months, for obvious reasons.

One of the big american business shows ( cant remember which) pointed out several months ago that all 5 of these banks were skating on very thin ice from a capital and available credit point of view. Apparantly the hens nave come home to roost
 

Hank Reardon

New member
Dec 26, 2007
331
0
0
BottomsUp said:
Well, actually there were 47,712 March 20 put contracts traded just on Friday. I'd say thats pretty high volume, and thats just on one strike price.
Which strike was that on ?
 

Hank Reardon

New member
Dec 26, 2007
331
0
0
BottomsUp said:
Well, actually there were 47,712 March 20 put contracts traded just on Friday. I'd say thats pretty high volume, and thats just on one strike price.
Well actually. there are 21000 open interest on the March 35 now !

Which means there was nothing even close to what Boffo was talking about ,
 
Last edited:

boffo

New member
Dec 27, 2002
720
0
0
GTA
You're right, I don't know what the strike price was so I was just speculating.

Heard that the volume of puts spiked up by 1,000% last Wednesday though and regulators consider that suspicious that someone was acting on inside information.
 

Hank Reardon

New member
Dec 26, 2007
331
0
0
boffo said:
You're right, I don't know what the strike price was so I was just speculating.

Heard that the volume of puts spiked up by 1,000% last Wednesday though and regulators consider that suspicious that someone was acting on inside information.
any insider trades will be rewarded by jail time
 

S.C. Joe

Client # 13
Nov 2, 2007
7,139
1
0
Detroit, USA
Hank Reardon said:
any insider trades will be rewarded by jail time


Ha, ha, ha...just like the people in Asia who heavily shorted the airline stocks right before 9/11.
 

Hank Reardon

New member
Dec 26, 2007
331
0
0
Only dealing with 1 stock here , and my point really was about the non issue of the guy Boffo was talking about, but whatever,
 

S.C. Joe

Client # 13
Nov 2, 2007
7,139
1
0
Detroit, USA
Dam, the brokerage stocks sure moved alot today.

Lehman Bothers--LEH went as low as $20.25 today, last I seen it was at $33!

Some people are making a killing today...and some gotten killed too.
 

Hank Reardon

New member
Dec 26, 2007
331
0
0
Wow !

S.C. Joe said:
Dam, the brokerage stocks sure moved alot today.

Lehman Bothers--LEH went as low as $20.25 today, last I seen it was at $33!

Some people are making a killing today...and some gotten killed too.
Some people made lots and some people lost lots on the market today !!

Thats gotta be a first !!
 

Mia.Colpa

Persian Lover
Dec 6, 2005
4,497
0
0
S.C. Joe said:
Dam, the brokerage stocks sure moved alot today.

Lehman Bothers--LEH went as low as $20.25 today, last I seen it was at $33!

Some people are making a killing today...and some gotten killed too.

Canadian banks got hit as well, not as steep, but nonetheless BMO below $40.... some bargain hunting soon.
 

petitelover

International User
Jan 14, 2003
860
2
0
Planet Earth
Hank Reardon said:
Some people made lots and some people lost lots on the market today !!

Thats gotta be a first !!
Don't bother trying to have an intelligent conversation with Hank, he is always right in his own mind. :confused:
 

Hank Reardon

New member
Dec 26, 2007
331
0
0
petitelover said:
Don't bother trying to have an intelligent conversation with Hank, he is always right in his own mind. :confused:
Well even you must admit that his comment of ''some made a killing and some got killed'' is pretty obvious in the stock market !!!
 

21pro

Crotch Sniffer
Oct 22, 2003
7,830
1
0
Caledon East
Here's a simple explanation for why BSC is trading at above $4.80 than the offer price of $2

Short Answer: Options

Some traders will give you wrong answers like Short
covering and other clueless replies, but that is not what it is about.

No Idiot is going to buyback a $50 Bill with a $100 bill (Unless some 'smart' Wall-street idiots)

Long Answer:
JPM is actually giving 0.054 shares to 1 BSC share.

So, A BSC investor is not actually getting $2 cash, but a MAX (0.054x
JPM, BookValue of BSC).

That is the investor has a downward protection of 0.054x JPM stock and
and upside potential of Actual BookValue of BSC. This is a classic
option instrument where you get MAX (Stock-Strike, 0)


So, BSC at minimum would trade at 0.054x of JPM's share price. But
there is an upside potential for BSC.
Between now and the actual close, good things can happen in this world
and people may discover that the BSC's books is not bad at all and its
equity value may be worth $5, $10, or even $30. There is a remote
probability that such a thing can happen

If BSC were trading at $2, (Technically at 0.054x JPM) Smart Investors
would do the following

Buy 1 BSC share = -$2
Short 0.054x = +$2

Total = $0

I have two positions with $0 Invested from my pocket

During closing, one of the two following scenario can happen
i) BSC is really crap and the JPM deal is the best they can get. I use
my 0.054 share that I get from JPM to cover my short. I make $0 here
ii) I have different valuations for BSC books at varying
probabilities. In which case BSC stock would grow accordingly. Lets
take an example, BSC is worth 0.07x JPM(Say $3 for convenience) on the
books

I Sell my 1 BSC share +$3
I Cover my 0.054x short -$2 and I make $1 here (or Technically 0.016x
JPM)

So there is an arbitrage opportunity at $2 (technically at 0.054x
JPM), where you are essentially getting a 'lottery ticket' for free.
Since in a free market, there is no such thing as free lottery ticket
(which is really equivalent to a call option), BSC trades at $2 + a
Call Option. The market has decided that Call Option is worth $2.50
(considering BSC's huge volatility, it is a fair game)

Note: For really advanced readers, I've ignored the interest rate
implications that occurs when shorting a stock
 

S.C. Joe

Client # 13
Nov 2, 2007
7,139
1
0
Detroit, USA
I thought a stock had to be over $4 to short it? Well maybe with options you can get around that.

I never understood options :confused: Every time I look deep in to them, I came out with a headache, ha ha.

Maybe just as well.
 
Toronto Escorts