Bill Gates says climate crisis won’t cause ‘humanity’s demise’ in call to shift focus to ‘improving lives’

[Frankfooter]

NO

your altered chart shows over 1.0 degree of warming, in 2024
View attachment 505473
while the real chart from Roy spencer's chart shows the temperature anomaly never exceeds 1.0 C
View attachment 505475
anyone is free to observe the real graphic & witness first hand Frank footers foolish, childish and intentional deception
Latest Global Temps « Roy Spencer, PhD


YOU intentionally posted a FRAUDELENT mis-representation of Roy Spencer's data


the facts do not lie
frankfooter lies all the time




you are both incredibly dishonest and incredibly stupid






they are NOT the same. your fraudulent chart exceeds 1 C, Roy Spencer's does not
busted

One is from 2024 and one from 2025.
Otherwise they are the same.
If they were tweaked, ask Spencer why he tweaked it.

Now you think that somehow proves there is no warming?
amazing

All this thread does is remind me that there is a study that shows climate change deniers are shitty people

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1711445094681735185

 

[JohnLarue]

What, you gonna argue that this time maybe the planet won't keep warming?

the planet has warmed and it has cooled many times in the past
i would never be so bold to state what natural variability will be in the future
we are emerging from an ice age so one can expect some natural warming
it is completely out of mankind's control

Even though you've been wrong about this every year of your life?

wrong

Your pet theory is about IR absorption, larue.
Here's the latest, the result of 1.5ºC warming means that the atmosphere holds more moisture.
That means more extreme storms like the hurricane in Jamaica, which was big enough to be a category 6.

it is not a pet theory
ir absorption is defined by the laws of physics

hurricanes have been battering the caribeen for millions of years

As a result, IR absorption is declining and the planet is warming even faster.

??
IR absorption is declining ??


you really do not have a clue what you are posting about

i guess that is what can be expected from a high school dropout turned climate fraudster

 

[Frankfooter]

the planet has warmed and it has cooled many times in the past
i would never be so bold to state what natural variability will be in the future
we are emerging from an ice age so one can expect some natural warming
it is completely out of mankind's control

Again, larue, just because you're not bright enough to understand the science doesn't mean other people can't.
This is a debate about anthropogenic climate change, the effects of man made greenhouses on the global climate.
If you can't understand it, just shut up.

Scientists have known for 50 years, including Exxon's own, oil funded scientists.
Its only you that can't understand it.
Research shows that company modeled and predicted global warming with ‘shocking skill and accuracy’ starting in the 1970s

it is not a pet theory
ir absorption is defined by the laws of physics

IR absorption is increasing, larue.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1847304959362039833

hurricanes have been battering the caribeen for millions of years

And in the last 20 years they have become much stronger and we need a category 6 for the first time.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1983898616423915920

 

[JohnLarue]

Again, larue, just because you're not bright enough to understand the science doesn't mean other people can't.

says the high school drop out
i understand the science quite well thank you

how's that 'your log chart shows cooling' working for you ?
bloody moron

This is a debate about anthropogenic climate change, the effects of man made greenhouses on the global climate.
If you can't understand it, just shut up.

FU
you do not get to define the debate

Scientists have known for 50 years, including Exxon's own, oil funded scientists.
Its only you that can't understand it.
Research shows that company modeled and predicted global warming with ‘shocking skill and accuracy’ starting in the 1970s

https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2023/01/harvard-led-analysis-finds-exxonmobil-internal-research-accurately-predicted-climate-change/#:~:text=In

time for you to clue in
propaganda does not define science

IR absorption is increasing, larue.

a few posts earlier

IR absorption is decreasing, larue

you do not know what you are talking about
besides IR absorption is saturated @ the all important 15 microwave length

 

[Frankfooter]

says the high school drop out
i understand the science quite well thank you

how's that 'your log chart shows cooling' working for you ?
bloody moron

You don't understand the science, its obvious.
Climate change deniers are a tiny group in Canada.
About 5-6% of the population and the ones in that group that don't think the greenhouse effect exists is even tinier.

FU
you do not get to define the debate

https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2023/01/harvard-led-analysis-finds-exxonmobil-internal-research-accurately-predicted-climate-change/#:~:text=In

time for you to clue in
propaganda does not define science

You sure get angry when you can't debate the facts.
That's a Harvard study of well established facts about what Exxon knew.
It proves everything you say is a lie, that oil funded scientists came to the same results as every other legit scientist.
No wonder you have a melt down every time its pointed out.

Scientific America found the same thing.

Exxon Knew about Climate Change Almost 40 Years Ago

A new investigation shows the oil company understood the science before it became a public issue and spent millions to promote misinformation

www.scientificamerican.com

you do not know what you are talking about
besides IR absorption is saturated @ the all important 15 microwave length

Its a return of the Confederacy of Dunces!

View attachment 505647

Hey larue, if that chart is accurate then tell us how much warmer the planet should be, instead of the 1.5ºC it is?
Give us the exact number you get from reading that chart.

Then tell us why the world isn't that temp.

Show us how smart you are and how well you understand what you post.

 

[JohnLarue]

Its a return of the Confederacy of Dunces!

your the one wearing the dunce cap

i bet this brings back some humiliating moments for you

 

[JohnLarue]

You don't understand the science, its obvious.
Climate change deniers are a tiny group in Canada.
About 5-6% of the population and the ones in that group that don't think the greenhouse effect exists is even tinier.

totally irrelevant to the fundamental laws of physics
why do you insist scientific truth is determined by a popularity poll

that thinking defines dunce

You sure get angry when you can't debate the facts.
That's a Harvard study of well established facts about what Exxon knew.

what anybody knew is totally irrelevant to the fundamental laws of physics
why do you insist scientific truth is determined by accusing others of fault ?
that thinking defines dunce

It proves everything you say is a lie, that oil funded scientists came to the same results as every other legit scientist.

totally irrelevant to the fundamental laws of physics
why do you insist scientific truth is determined by authority

that thinking defines dunce

all you have proven is you are a science illiterate spewer of propaganda

No wonder you have a melt down every time its pointed out.

Hardly.
i am laughing as you embarrass yourself

 

[Frankfooter]

totally irrelevant to the fundamental laws of physics
why do you insist scientific truth is determined by a popularity poll

that thinking defines dunce

By that metric you must also think the earth is flat.
There are some true iconoclasts who have declared it flat and only a popularity contest says otherwise.
They also say that NASA is wrong and only they know the 'fundamental laws of physics' or something like that.

How is your stance any different?

what anybody knew is totally irrelevant to the fundamental laws of physics
why do you insist scientific truth is determined by accusing others of fault ?
that thinking defines dunce

We are talking about the scientists hired by Exxon who found that burning fossil fuels would cause climate change.
Why have you now declared that both Exxon and IPCC scientists don't understand 'scientific truth' that you alone can understand?

totally irrelevant to the fundamental laws of physics
why do you insist scientific truth is determined by authority

Why do you insist that your self declared knowledge is superior to thousands of scientists who actually studied the climate?
Why should anyone consider you an authority on anything?

On this board you self present as a dunce whose Dunning Kruger belief that he is smarter than Exxon, NASA and IPCC makes him a laughing stock.

that thinking defines dunce

all you have proven is you are a science illiterate spewer of propaganda

So far we have shown that your references to Spencer and satellite data show that the troposphere has warmed 1ºC.
Surface temps show 1.5ºC.
Sea surface temps also show warming.

All of those are changing as the IPCC projected.
According to your self declared authority, none of that can possibly happen.

Hardly.
i am laughing as you embarrass yourself

Dunning Kruger