Daisy, you are anything but ignorant and uneducated that's 100% for sure!!!
Creating an artificial currency with a finite supply is not the same as M1 or M2 (money supply)
Anyone who studies economics understand that there is a universal need to expand the pie - by limiting supply you are artificially creating inflation for a scarce resource.
As you correctly pointed out holding onto a scarce resource will not expand the economy and will not result in economic investment or liquidity.
There is also the issue of barriers to entry - why is one product worth more than another - think of pot stocks - are they commodities - can they differentiate their offering?
In this case, the resource has no real tangible value other than what people perceive it to hold - revenue, earnings, assets, regulatory it is a total shit show - I would rather own gold than bitcoin, it has always be used for industrial or cosmetic uses, it is portable and can be traded anywhere on the planet. Gold also has a finite supply but unlike bitcoin it is tangible and has a use - the one value of bitcoin as you said is the blockchain technology - similar to BlackBerry - the licensed technology is more value than producing Crackberry phones. Telsa is another example of a disrupter - you are buying intellectual technology and a vision for the future, not today's earnings.
As far as my own $ I have less than 30 securities total and diversify among many sectors globally. When you buy a business you are buying the management, the opportunities for growth, recurring revenues, regulatory oversight, and you are diversifying your holdings across geographies. Many Bitcoin "investors" are too concentrated and exposed.
For the love of God I wish we could make this a sticky in the "investment" section of the forum.
Last edited:






