ckupets04 said:
I'm aware of the attendance records back then. I think everyone is aware of that. I dont really think that proves anything though. In 50 years if the Blue Jays are not drawing crowds are we still gonna point to the early 90s and say "hey we set attendance records in the early 90s we are a baseball town". I know a lot of people that say they were turned off by the strike. Its been 15 years for gods sakes. Turned off by the strike? Maybe those people just dont want to admit that they are not baseball fans so they instead say its the fault of the strike. I can understand being turned off for a few years but its been 15 years. I dont wanna hear that some strike from 15 years ago is still causing disinterest in a sport. I wonder if those same people will stop watching their favorite TV shows b/c the TV writers were on strike a couple years ago.
Very well said. That strike excuse has gotten old, yet I heard a caller mention it earlier tonight on Bob McCowans radio show. Funny, I don't think I have heard anyone say they don't watch NHL hockey anymore because of the 2004-05 lockout that cancelled the Stanley Cup playoffs.
ckupets04 said:
Maybe there is an age-gap here but I am 30 years old and the vast majority of my friends dont even talk baseball these days or like baseball and it seems like I am the only guy in my circle of friends that like the game or even watch games on TV.
You only have to follow the discussions in this sports forum on terb to see how little interest there seems to be in baseball. It is pretty much Blue Jays or nothing. Then again, after a few losses, there are even few posts in that thread. Win a bunch of games and they come out of the woodwork to post. I have started MLB season threads the past two years and I bet that 75% of the posts in there are mine. Last year someone (a Blue Jays fan, BTW) posted how boring the thread was, mostly Boston info. Yet there was a thread there just waiting for discussion on any MLB team and all the poster had to contribute was how boring it was. Maybe I post about the Sox so much because other than them and the Yankees, I am not sure
some people know much about any other teams. LOL.
ckupets04 said:
The Skydome was new back then and there were lots of people that just went there just because it was the in place to be not necessarily for the baseball. You also have to remember that when something is relatively new there is an initial novelty about it but after a while the novelty wears off and whats left is just the true fans.
I get that too. Reminds me of that tv commercial about the Miller beer delivery guy. People hanging out having a great time, with no idea who is playing. Here is the commercial. It is classic when he says 'can anybody tell me what inning it is?'. Silence. Then that's it, away goes the free beer. LOL.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0_OxCHyLLkU
As a comparison, when the Indians opened up Jacobs Field in the mid 1990's, they started on a nice run of play-off years. During that time, they set a record of 455 consecutive sellouts. New ballpark, winning team, sellout crowds. Sound familiar? The only difference is that I would be willing to bet 'beer delivery guy' didn't have to take away their beer for not knowing what inning it was. LOL.
ckupets04 said:
By the way, which cities would you consider to be bad baseball towns. Toronto is a good baseball town in your opinion, which cities in the MLB are bad ones in your opinion?
Tampa Bay is a bad baseball town. Thank goodness the Red Sox come in for 9 games a year, that's the only time they fill the place. Other nights they pack about 12,000 cowbell ringers into that dump.
One knock on Toronto used to be they had a sure fire hall of famer (at the time) pitching for them, two time Cy Young award winner in a Jays uniform. Yet, it didn't seem to do much for attendance on the days he would start.
I agree with you, a few years of 4 million fans in a brand new ballpark when the team was winning championships does not make it a baseball city.