I don't know what jockee and ranger are fighting about, so I am glad booboo, the original poster, has come back again.booboobear said:This is why I find THE interesting because there are so many variables one being the people you play against . Odds are another thing and betting a third thing and then the amount of the blinds changes peoples thinking. What you say about losing is also interesting , I was at Niagara on Sunday and a guy was walking around cursing out loud to himself , obviously he lost big and also should probably not be going to a casino. I appreciate all the input from everyone on this board. What I find real interesting is how some of the pros bluff with a fairly weak hand. I don't think there is any real way of telling how strong a hand someone else has if you are bluffing with a poor hand.
I'm sure everyone you played with enjoyed the dead money.jockeee said:sure i was what?
i,m on Poker stars..pm me if you want to know my table namehomonger said:Sigh. I wish I had never gotten involved in this part of the discussion.
Anyway, you missed my point. I didn't say Gus Hansen didn't know the math. My point was that it is not the focal point of his style.
And my overall point was that different styles can be successful.
I once again find myself agreeing with danmand. I agree it is an overstatement to say EVERYONE understands pot odds and math, but it is all a matter of your vantage point. Once you get to a certain skill level and game, I do agree that is a given that everyone does. So you're both right.
All this talk has gotten me wondering... anyone here registered at PokerStars? We can continue the discussion on the virtual felt.
not a pro but i,ve played at Blue Heron cash games,played in 60$ buy ins at local "charity" events...my most exciting experience was a 500$ buy in tournament in Brantford in Sept...almost made the final table.danmand said:Are any of you professional or semi-professional players?
Okay, that's two... Anyone else?twobigo said:i,m on Poker stars..pm me if you want to know my table name
I think a JOCKEE AND RANGER ARE BLUFFING . I am just trying to learn , the truth I think is that it definitely not a science and even the best pros get fooled by bluffs . I know I have a lot to learn , right now I am trying to curb my tendency to bet with nothing , sure doesn't work in limit games , sometimes I don't have the patience to wait for a goood hand.homonger said:I don't know what jockee and ranger are fighting about, so I am glad booboo, the original poster, has come back again.
As I mentioned earlier, a lot of TV poker is misleading, because it is so heavily edited, and you don't see how the players played their hands prior to making their bluff. If a guy has a real tight table image, he probably can pull off a bluff. Similarly, you'll see some guys get paid off on their big hands and you're thinking at home that there is no way you would have called that bet but they didn't show you the same guy bluff earlier or play junk.
Of course, you never know for sure what your opponent may be holding, but there are clues. .
I think it is good that you are trying to learn the game, although I think this is kind of an odd place to do that. That said, I have always found that there is someone here to knows the answer to your question, no matter what it is.booboobear said:I am just trying to learn, the truth I think is that it definitely not a science and even the best pros get fooled by bluffs . I know I have a lot to learn , right now I am trying to curb my tendency to bet with nothing , sure doesn't work in limit games , sometimes I don't have the patience to wait for a goood hand.
homonger said:I think it is good that you are trying to learn the game, although I think this is kind of an odd place to do that. That said, I have always found that there is someone here to knows the answer to your question, no matter what it is.
Hold 'em can definitely be a boring game, and as I have mentioned before, it is frequently described as 57 minutes of boredom, followed by 3 minutes of terror. It is most definitely a game that rewards patience, and remember, it is not the number of pots you play and win, it is how many chips you win overall.
Have you ever considered playing tournaments? .
One of the things I notice about low limit NLHE cash games is that pre-flop raises mean almost nothing, unless it is a really big raise. I see guys routinely calling 3x or 4x raises in a $1/2 game, because it is only $6 and $8 respectively. And of course, once one guy calls your raise, it becomes more and more attractive from a pot odds standpoint for other guys to call too. These guys are looking to play the odds, flop big and win a big pot. If they flop any kind of draw, a lot of these guys will stay with you, because of the implied odds.booboobear said:Still lots to learn and like I said I need to control my tendency to bet with shitty hands just to be part of the action. I UNDERSTAND NO LIMIT IS TOTALLY DIFFERENT and again DIFFERENT AGAIN DEPENDING ON THE SIZE OF THE BLINDS. From my limited experience in limit too many guys bet with small hands because the stakes are low, something similar to me.
This points to one of the pitfalls in "reading" opponents. When playing at a low stake table, many of the players will not care to calculate the odds, and therefore may behave as if they have a good hand when they don't. And if 6 players are chasing, one of them are likely to get lucky. Allthough in the long run, you may have an advantage against mad chasers, if there are enough of them, it can hard to see hand after hand being lost to impossible odds.homonger said:One of the things I notice about low limit NLHE cash games is that pre-flop raises mean almost nothing, unless it is a really big raise. I see guys routinely calling 3x or 4x raises in a $1/2 game, because it is only $6 and $8 respectively. And of course, once one guy calls your raise, it becomes more and more attractive from a pot odds standpoint for other guys to call too. These guys are looking to play the odds, flop big and win a big pot. If they flop any kind of draw, a lot of these guys will stay with you, because of the implied odds.
In general, I think that if you bet enough to deny your opponents the proper odds to chase their draws, then you shouldn't care if they want to chase you. You will win money more often than not in that scenario. But I have learned the hard way that once in a while you will get chased down in that situation, and will lose a big pot.