Thank you, Lancsfoundit.LancsLad said:Visualize whirled peas!!!!!!!!!!!
http://www.peacepeas.com/cgi-bin/cpshop.cgi/2434917432
Thank you, Lancsfoundit.LancsLad said:Visualize whirled peas!!!!!!!!!!!
You 'da man! Did that too at Cupidy, in Bangkok.LancsLad said:Once, and one time only I had the pleasure of three girls at once in Thailand. Memories, ahhhhhh.
Gyaos said:You 'da man! Did that too at Cupidy, in Bangkok.Had 3 girls once in Japan too, Ikebukuro (cost 60,000 yen for three Chinese girls). After that, I think 2 at once is just right.
Gyaos.
I'm still trying to find a way to satisify one women.LancsLad said:I hear you
Two at once would be my limit now. The mind is more than willing but with age, the flesh is weaker, so to speak.
Bangkok is an experience that all should enjoy at least once in their life. The whole non stop unabashed hedonism of the cities pleasure palaces is addictve.
lookingforitallthetime said:I'm still trying to find a way to satisify one women.![]()
Not that you have ever done that.LancsLad said:You can give them pleasure, cash, love, affection and loyalty all you want but they are NEVER satisfied!!!
danmand said:Not that you have ever done that.
As you might imagine, I agree with your earlieb post. Otherwise I likely would not have ended upLancsLad said:In my own "little" way I have tried.
danmand said:As you might imagine, I agree with your earlieb post. Otherwise I likely would not have ended up
spending untold hours on an escort review board.
You agree with the ersatz swede? That might put some space in betwix you and Lookingglass.LancsLad said:Lets call this what Anderson does, a " hooker board". We are all just degenerates!!!!!!!!!!![]()
danmand said:You agree with the ersatz swede? That might put some space in betwix you and Lookingglass.
In general. I have had a policy of not putting smilies in my postsLancsLad said:PLEASE NOTE USE OF THE SMILIE IN MY POST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Sarcasm is often missed in the written word.danmand said:In general. I have had a policy of not putting smilies in my posts
(although I do it occasionally now). I find it an abomination to use smilies, because it
implies that the reader is NOT smart enough to get the irony, sarcasm or
whatever else is in the post. Using smilies is descending to the lowest
common denominator. I must admit, however, the policy of not using smilies
have caused me problems, because some members assume a post without smilies is serious.
You do realize "lookingglass" is a term of endearment used by Anderson don't you? It seems Anderson is rubbing off on you. Just how close are you two?danmand said:You agree with the ersatz swede? That might put some space in betwix you and Lookingglass.
How true is that!LancsLad said:You can give them pleasure, cash, love, affection and loyalty all you want but they are NEVER satisfied!!!
I shall wash my keyboard with soap.lookingforitallthetime said:You do realize "lookingglass" is a term of endearment used by Anderson don't you? It seems Anderson is rubbing off on you. Just how close are you two?
You don't understand. You are not giving them ENOUGH pleasure, cash,lookingforitallthetime said:How true is that!
Thanks for the advise Dr. Phil. (I would add a smilie here but I know it's a soft spot for you)danmand said:You don't understand. You are not giving them ENOUGH pleasure, cash,
love, affection and loyalty, and you critically forgot to give them enough attention
(i.e 100%).
lookingforitallthetime said:Thanks for the advise Dr. Phil. (I would add a smilie here but I know it's a soft spot for you)
You must be referring to the soft spot in my heart for englishmen.LancsLad said:danmands "softspot" is slowly shrinking as he matures.![]()
danmand said:You must be referring to the soft spot in my heart for englishmen.