Yes, high levels of debt with no end in sight is accurate and factual.What I posted was accurate and factual.
The video you posted was of a guy who didnt know what he was talking about.
Yes, high levels of debt with no end in sight is accurate and factual.What I posted was accurate and factual.
The video you posted was of a guy who didnt know what he was talking about.
Look at the audience dude. How are you gonna get such concepts out to the masses? He briefly mentioned the use of wood composites in the construction of housing but then rolled on when he realized that people could not see how revolutionary this is.So why would I vote for someone when they haven't said what they are going to do? And how they are going to do it.
That's sounds a lot like a Trumpish planning style to me.
All countries incur debt to finance investments and debt for countries usually is long term.Yes, high levels of debt with no end in sight is accurate and factual.
And these "investments" may not work out. Look at the last 10 years here.All countries incur debt to finance investments and debt for countries usually is long term.
Nothing unusual about it.
Dude, you are the one who said they haven't said so. Basically they have promised in 3 years to increase spending, reduce spending, and balance the budget, with tax cuts. And no transfer cuts, or program cuts.They have.
But what you are requesting is basically an analysis of what is going to be cut and how.
That isn't for people to know at this stage and it isn't ever a part of a platform or a mandate.
What does Pierre have?
Outdated slogans.
Yes they have promised to increase capital spending, reduce operational expenses.Dude, you are the one who said they haven't said so. Basically they have promised in 3 years to increase spending, reduce spending, and balance the budget, with tax cuts. And no transfer cuts, or program cuts.
I ain't buying it.
So dont invest at all then?And these "investments" may not work out.
I don't believe in Liberal investing. You guys championed him as the master economist, but he is shaping up to be Trudeau 2.0 like I said months back.So dont invest at all then?
How is that going to help us grow?
What is the glorified sloganeer proposing?but he is shaping up to be Trudeau 2.0 like I said months back.
Time for Change
Here are the facts as far as I have read up until now:
- Carney separates operating expenses (wages, daily expenses etc) and capital expenses (investments in long-term assets like infrastructure, clean energy, and defense , accepting modest deficits to finance these initiatives.).
no, we need de-regulation & getting govt the hell out of the way to growThis is good. We need these investments to grow.
Trudeau promised to balance the operating budget over a few years in 2015 , how did that work out ?He has also promised to balance the operating budget over 3 years.
housing / pipelines get built by private investment, if govt will just get the hell out of the wayToo much red meat for dumb Canadians. People that think somehow PP can fix the housing crisis, healthcare and build a massive network of pipelines and reduce govt spend all at the same time.
De-regulation to get our massive amount of resources to market. Not a bad plan for a country blessed with some of the largest oil, gas and mineral reserves on the planet.What is the glorified sloganeer proposing?
it gets worseDe-regulation to get our massive amount of resources to market. Not a bad plan for a country blessed with some of the largest oil, gas and mineral reserves on the planet.
money pitThe four-year plan also includes billions in gender and equity-related spending,
cap growth in public sector employment?He admitted that he’d need to cap growth in public sector employment to meet the platform’s fiscal targets.
AI Overview
you can not grow govt faster than the private sector without a lot of real bad shit happeningLearn more
The Canadian federal government's workforce has seen significant growth in recent years, outpacing both private sector job growth and the overall population increase. Between 2015/16 and 2022/23, the number of federal public servants increased by 26.1%, while the Canadian population grew by only 9.1%. This rapid growth has placed a strain on federal finances, with some analysts estimating that the federal deficit could be lowered if hiring had simply kept pace with population growth
but he still plans for future growth in the public sector“(We’re looking at) a series of measures that are going to make government more effective,” Carney said in response to a question on the platform’s budget math.
He noted that the federal public service has grown at an unsustainable rate of 40 per cent over the last decade.
He admitted that he’d need to cap growth in public sector employment to meet the platform’s fiscal targets.
lets not forget why we had to get rid of TrudeauConservative Leader Pierre Poilievre, also in B.C. on Saturday, said that Carney’s platform would make life even more expensive for Canadians.
“Amazingly, Mr. Carney plans to run even bigger inflationary deficits than Justin Trudeau had already budgeted,” said Poilievre.
How were Trudeaus polices reducing house building?housing / pipelines get built by private investment, if govt will just get the hell out of the way
Trudeau drove hundreds of billions of investments out of Canada
I don't believe him. It's that simple. I don't believe him, due to his record of previous statements, and his record in private equity, that his has the best interests of the nation at heart. I think the Liberal party at this juncture needs to be put out of office.Yes they have promised to increase capital spending, reduce operational expenses.
As I said savings can be realized in multiple ways.
But how exactly they are going to do it isn't something anyone every says, before getting to power.
Its not like people will understand it anyway.
So the only relevant bit is that you want to vote conservative.
So just say that instead of "not buying it".
So dont invest at all then?
How is that going to help us grow?
Wrong.housing / pipelines get built by private investment, if govt will just get the hell out of the way
Trudeau drove hundreds of billions of investments out of Canada
Yet right wingers voted for DoFo here and he massively has increased Ontario debt.How in good conscience can anyone vote for this?
Especially after this same party doubled the national debt in less than 10 years.
Vampirically sucking the life from the young and unborn. Really sickening.