Carney's Rally In Nepean

[onomatopoeia]

@Valcazar: Reread your post quoted below very carefully:

Oh, the preformative outrage at them is ridiculous.
I do think they have outlived most of their usefulness in their current form, though.

Now, consider a common situation: someone is reading some, but not all of the posts in this thread, either scrolling past certain contributors, or reading the opening post(s), then returning to the current page.

If one did not know in advance which group or non-binary individual is referenced in your use of 'they/ them/their' pronouns, a valid interpretation of your post is that you are paraphrasing an infamous quote attributed to William Tecumseh Sherman:

https://rare-gallery.com/thumbs/615424-William-T.-Sherman-quote.jpg

 

[onomatopoeia]

Its about prioritizing. 1. food 2. shelter .... I own lots of things, many which I acquired under Liberal govts.

Li - ral party........ been berry, berry good to me.

 

[nottyboi]

Pierre has said he will ban Conservatives from affiliation with the WEF while Carney is a card carrying member.

Why do you feel the need to lie blatantly?

Prem Watsa who endorsed PP is HIGHLY affiliated with the WEF. So is PP gonna ban him? lol.

 

[Valcazar]

@Valcazar: Reread your post quoted below very carefully:



Now, consider a common situation: someone is reading some, but not all of the posts in this thread, either scrolling past certain contributors, or reading the opening post(s), then returning to the current page.

If one did not know in advance which group or non-binary individual is referenced in your use of 'they/ them/their' pronouns, a valid interpretation of your post is that you are paraphrasing an infamous quote attributed to William Tecumseh Sherman:

https://rare-gallery.com/thumbs/615424-William-T.-Sherman-quote.jpg

No.
No one would interpret that without a wild amount of bad faith reading.

 

[mdo2886]

Prem Watsa who endorsed PP is HIGHLY affiliated with the WEF. So is PP gonna ban him? lol.

Only someone grasping at paper straws would worry about one individual endorsement versus dude with his name and picture on the official website roflmao

https://www.weforum.org/stories/authors/mark-carney/

 

[nottyboi]

Only someone grasping at paper straws would worry about one individual endorsement versus dude with his name and picture on the official website roflmao

https://www.weforum.org/stories/authors/mark-carney/

He was one of the highest profile names in the Con announcement of the endorsement. No doubt a major doner to the CPC

 

[Frankfooter]

So I've heard, although now it is just the play and the whole "surprise" aspect is gone.



It's a slogan I've heard, of course.

Its also an argument that even though the words hold no impact its still important that they are said.

 

[mdo2886]

He was one of the highest profile names in the Con announcement of the endorsement. No doubt a major doner to the CPC

There is no point arguing with someone who can't see the significant difference between the two.

Elbows Up!

 

[onomatopoeia]

The guy with the camera is a troll.
Probably riles people up and then turns on his camera for views and makes 30 second clips.
Why doesn't he show what transpired before these people got pissed off with him?

You're stating this as a fact, rather than as an opinion. What evidence do you have to make this conclusion?

His 30 second clips and his click/rage bait tweets.

Could you provide a link to one or more of those click/ rage bait tweets?

I actually CAN'T do that myself. I signed up for a twitter/ X account once, just to be able to lurk, and within 48 hours, my account had been closed 'for violating terms of service', even though I hadn't made a post....

 

[Shaquille Oatmeal]

View attachment 431288

It isn't that hard to find.

https://x.com/rightblend

 

[Valcazar]

Its also an argument that even though the words hold no impact its still important that they are said.

Sure.
This debate "what representation matters, how much, and in what way" is a long-standing one.