Sorry my guy you jumped in a convo without reading the whole back and forth so do your homework. Being against trans activism is acceptable and not stochastism terrorism.
Charlie Kirk Shot in the Neck in Utah (Update: Shooter Alt-right links)
- Thread starter lir2016
- Start date
Michelle Obama: Harvard and Princeton graduate
Charlie Kirk: community college drop out
Crazy how POS’ like Charlie Kirk think they’re better than an Ivy League graduate when he dropped out of community college.
No, because I'm calling for the rule of law, not violence.
This is a call for stochastic terrorism.
But Kirk is in neither of those places.
He is in the US where it is not outlawed, but if it was up to him, it very well will be.
Nobody said he should have been murdered here.
No it isn't. They used to say the same about gay activism, women's activism, black activism. Now, calling it terrorism in my opinion is too far fetched.
Instead it's simply the same old attacks on civil rights the USA and Western society has slowly been grappling with for about 100 years or so. A drop in the lake of history. There will always be a pendulum on these things as lines are redrawn, and pushback from those fearful of change.
Or in Charlie's case, lacking the empathy to see them as equal human beings and not projects to be converted.
No. No one argued for murder. Everyone has condemned it.
I don't know that he did and I didn't say he did.
I really never heard of him before this or cared.
But some say he did glorify violence and guns.
Trans activism is your strong argument because trans is still controversial.
But despising blacks and women as inferior?.... That's just cruel bullshit.
You mean when I repeatedly say he was a shitty human but shouldn't have been killed over that you think that is code for 'kill him now'?
What is going on in your head?
briefly, "i dont like what charlie had to say but it was not terrorism". Thank you have a good day.
Starts losing an argument…immediately resorts to racist attack with use of banana emoji. What a loser lolTypical opinion of a brainless primate. Fetch!
He never issued a direct call for violence.
He demonized minorities, stirred up anger and hatred, which is very likely to cause violence.
No you havent. You've insinuated his entire thread that Charlie deserved to get killed because of things he said.
You dont even know what you're saying anymore
There is not a single person who can be mainstream like kirk and say publicly that blacks are inferior. The case of nick fuentes and others demonstrate that.
Even then i would say that it s not stochastic terrorism to make a statement such as "race x has lower mental abilities than race y". Having lower abilities does not mean you deserve anger or violence. If i say "people with down syndrome have lower brain power", does that make me hateful toward them?
Stop lying Phil.
My very first post in this thread said:
Here is another:
Saying that is fucking racist and untrue. No matter whichever way you try to justify it it’s an untrue statement.
This bitch is crazy as fuck calling for Trump to give MAGA the green light to publicly execute Democrats. It’s only right wing MAGA nuts that are calling for violence in response to this situation.
