The 70% reduction of AIDS is only for unsafe sex; cut/uncut makes no difference if there's a condom (that doesn't break). I suppose we can attribute the US's high infection rate to their sex ed policies from the dark ages
And circumcizing babies is an absolutely barbaric practice. A grown man deciding to get cut is one thing, but making a permanent change to a baby's sex organs is a horrible thing to do. I have a hard time distinguishing it from sexual abuse.
That I don't get. I voted uncut and happy, but for the guys that are uncut and unhappy, why do they remain uncut?As the poll now stands, it is interesting that relatively speaking circumcised men are more happy with the status of their penises than uncircumcised men.
And circumcizing babies is an absolutely barbaric practice. A grown man deciding to get cut is one thing, but making a permanent change to a baby's sex organs is a horrible thing to do. I have a hard time distinguishing it from sexual abuse.






