looks like their data backs it up:
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/13/us/politics/hillary-clinton-james-comey.html?_r=0
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/13/us/politics/hillary-clinton-james-comey.html?_r=0
Clinton blames FBI for loss
- Thread starter nottyboi
- Start date
Actually, the most interesting part of the story is that the Clinton gang were so confident they had won that they had already popped open the champagne on Tuesday morning.
Oops....
In any event, I have no sympathy for them or their party. Hillary Clinton was still being actively investigated when the party sealed up her nomination in June. The Democratic bigwigs knew the risk.
And, of course, if the Clintons hadn't been running a "pay for play" racketeering scheme in the first place....
Oops....
In any event, I have no sympathy for them or their party. Hillary Clinton was still being actively investigated when the party sealed up her nomination in June. The Democratic bigwigs knew the risk.
And, of course, if the Clintons hadn't been running a "pay for play" racketeering scheme in the first place....
S
**Sophie**
That and also, if she would have just handed over ALL the emails from the get-go they wouldn't have noticed new emails once the WikiLeaks and Weiners laptop came out, forcing them to re-open it. Like hello? lol
If your next door neighbor or nephew or niece lost their race for Dog Catcher or Municipal Council would you encourage them to blame outside influences or tell them "stop the nonsense, take responsibility for your own actions!"
Trump has no political record. He blamed the nations problems on the people in charge.
I know, right?
He blamed everyone but himself when he was losing. "The polls are crooked." "The media is against me." "The votes are rigged."
S
**Sophie**
The polls were astoundingly wrong, Trump won. The media we know is colluding with the DNC they have lost much credibility CNN gave Hillary the debate questions lol, did you forget that part?. And the votes, well dead people are voting and have voted 2 and 3 times, people have charges laid against them, that's documented. What's wrong with speaking the truth?
It's a bit shocking that wil 2X the spending, the entire media on her side and a popular sitting POTUS campaigning hard that a reality TV guy got close, much less won. Speaks to how much she pissed off the young with the DNC/Bernie BS and how weak a candidate she was.
Trump out performed her among White College educated voters and all income segments over $50k as well and blue collar America. That's how much she sucked.
Trump out performed her among White College educated voters and all income segments over $50k as well and blue collar America. That's how much she sucked.
No matter how many times you repeat this lie, it's still going to be a lie. The polls were calling it an even race with Clinton leading, but a Trump win being within the margin of normal error.
They were not "astonishingly wrong".
They started moving towards Trump from the moment Comey intervened and they were still moving towards Trump on election day.
The day of the election, the New York Times said Clinton had an 84% chance of winning:
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/us/elections/polls.html?_r=0
That's pretty far off the mark when you look at the final result.
S
**Sophie**
If they hadn't kept Sanders out, Trump would have been beaten.
However, Clinton lost about 3% of her support with Comey's letter. That would have been enough, even with the margin of error and polling errors, to win the election.
Odd to think it was Russia and the FBI that put Trump in place.
