Couple deported

[Vinson]

Don't worry, I never look for your opinion.

Then stop quoting me duh

 

[Frankfooter]

__________

fine

More on the latest student trump wants to deport.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1904913475047952485

 

[huntethan2023]

She went to protests against genocide in Israel.
You are arguing the genocide is US policy and they are part

She was not "in a country to go to school".



Is she being deported to Korea? Poor girl, she could have crossed the border to Canada, claim refugee status.
We would have given 1 year free food, shelter, clothing. Meanwhile she can continue protests here. Burn our flags, shout death to Canada.

 

[Anbarandy]

Is she being deported to Korea? Poor girl, she could have crossed the border to Canada, claim refugee status.
We would have given 1 year free food, shelter, clothing. Meanwhile she can continue protests here. Burn our flags, shout death to Canada.

Bravo!

Such vitriol!

 

[Klatuu]

The founding fathers didn’t write the constitution to have this lot destroy one its most revered principles.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1905323583649313016

 

[Klatuu]

Who are racist snitches?

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1905968670741831798

 

[Valcazar]

Secondly, you cannot allow mass illegal nor LEGAL immigration [...]

Anyone paying attention in the future can ignore other reasoning Bucktee gives on the subject.
He's made the root position clear.

There is historical precedent for this. In WW2, we put Japanese and German citizens in camps with the understanding that we didn't know whether they'd have more allegiance to their country of origin or their new nation.

Please note that Bucktee considers Executive Order 9066 and Korematsu as positive goods.

 

[Frankfooter]

ICE has always operated outside of the constitution and the american legal system, based on dealing 'illegal immigration'.
Its always been their mandate, the dems backed this as well.

The US just needs to get rid of ICE altogether, but in the meantime there is no easy way to stop it.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1905877259241849333

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1905390163829887225

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1905685962803519866

 

[Leimonis]

Meanwhile in other news

 

[Frankfooter]

https://www.cbc.ca/newsinteractives/features/immigration-survey

More than 65% of Canadians agree.

Further: "More than 80 per cent of newcomers to Canada feel the country is bringing in too many people through its immigration system"

We return to the 80/20 rule. You're on the 20% side, deep in minority territory, even amongst newcomers who are themselves a minority. Yet you somehow think your views are representative.

So making the claim that myself, 65% of Canadians, and over 80% of newcomers should be ignored is itself flawed reasoning.

We are the majority, so you ignore us at your own peril.



Not good. A necessary evil.

Ditto for dropping the bomb on Japan.

Your article says immigration has been cut in about half.

 

[dirtydaveiii]

She was not "in a country to go to school".

"getting involved in politics" is not legal grounds for deportation.

R u really this obtuse?

actually speaking out against Trump is now grounds for deportation in the US

 

[dirtydaveiii]

https://www.cbc.ca/newsinteractives/features/immigration-survey

More than 65% of Canadians agree.

Further: "More than 80 per cent of newcomers to Canada feel the country is bringing in too many people through its immigration system"

We return to the 80/20 rule. You're on the 20% side, deep in minority territory, even amongst newcomers who are themselves a minority. Yet you somehow think your views are representative.

So making the claim that myself, 65% of Canadians, and over 80% of newcomers should be ignored is itself flawed reasoning.

We are the majority, so you ignore us at your own peril.



Not good. A necessary evil.

Ditto for dropping the bomb on Japan.

get the fuck out then

 

[Valcazar]

https://www.cbc.ca/newsinteractives/features/immigration-survey

More than 65% of Canadians agree.

Further: "More than 80 per cent of newcomers to Canada feel the country is bringing in too many people through its immigration system"

I don't deny those numbers. (Even though you couldn't help to make a small edit to change the meaning, now could you?)

I am just pointing out that "we should have no LEGAL immigration" is your position and all other explanations you give on the subject should be understood in that context.

So making the claim that myself, 65% of Canadians, and over 80% of newcomers should be ignored is itself flawed reasoning.

We are the majority, so you ignore us at your own peril.

I didn't say you should be ignored.
I said other things you say to obfuscate your reasons should be ignored.

Not good. A necessary evil.

I'll let that stand there, then.

 

[Valcazar]

I thought it was clear but in case it was not, I meant no MASS legal immigration.

Mass legal immigration may be better than mass illegal immigration, like what the US and European nations are suffering from, but it's still detrimental.

If I am to believe that, why the edit?

 

[Valcazar]

Because I posted a link stressing that my view aligns with the views of recent immigrants to Canada themselves.

Obviously immigrants to Canada are not going to oppose legal immigration to Canada.

That doesn't explain about your edit to change the meaning of what the news article said.