Discreet Dolls

Denying Holocaust Will be Illegal

Status
Not open for further replies.

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
53,950
11,811
113
Toronto
In the case of the Holocaust, there is zero percent chance of that. There is Nazi documentation, there is documentation from the armies that liberated the camps, there are the mass graves, piles of bones or teeth, lamps made of skin, the testimony of both survivors and the perpetrators, and property of dead victims. People who intentionally ignore all that can only be motivated by obsessive hatred and have no interest in promoting any kind of truth.
And the whole argument about the importance of and fighting for free speech is a total red herring.

It is all about ant-Semitism.
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
53,950
11,811
113
Toronto
if it is al lso obvious, why stop free speech on the matter?
You are cowardly in that you NEVER answer this question.
He did answer.

In the case of the Holocaust, there is zero percent chance of that. There is Nazi documentation, there is documentation from the armies that liberated the camps, there are the mass graves, piles of bones or teeth, lamps made of skin, the testimony of both survivors and the perpetrators, and property of dead victims. People who intentionally ignore all that can only be motivated by obsessive hatred and have no interest in promoting any kind of truth.
These racists should not be given a platform with which to spread their vile hate.
 

barnacler

Well-known member
May 13, 2013
1,526
927
113
Why the deception on your part? (The topic is too serious to be trivialized as silly games.)
I am not an anti-semite, and I believe in free speech about anything.

Explain to me why you feel that opinions that you "Know" are wrong should not be heard.

Probably the 6th time I have asked, I enjoy your little wrigglings away from answering,
 

barnacler

Well-known member
May 13, 2013
1,526
927
113
He did answer.


These racists should not be given a platform with which to spread their vile hate.
They have an opinion. You call it vile hate.

they would disagree with that label.

Maybe they call it the truth. Lets hear the facts, but never ever close off the debate about anything.

Why should YOU decide who can be heard and who can't?

Why should anyone decide?

The vilest hate flourishes in regimes that censor.

Not where free speech flourishes.

You are working against your own interests, even though you don't realize it.

the shutting down of debate can be used at any time by any tyrannical majority if not vigorously protected.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
96,392
24,837
113
It's pretty transparent why you are trying to change the topic from anti-semitic motives behind Holocaust denial to your hate-filled obsession with Israel.
Its very transparent.
The absofuckinglutely horrid acts of the very real Holocaust do not justify present day apartheid and settler colonialism.
You can't right a wrong by committing war crimes.

And you can't claim to be calling out racism while you are actively defending apartheid.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
62,644
7,076
113
So YOU decide what is an "HONEST" opinion?
...
??? Last I checked, I never claimed to be the arbiter of reality. The thread is about the GOVEERNMENT deciding as is their legal right.

And an HONEST opinion is one motivated by a desire to find out more. Holocaust deniers are purely motivated by hatred of Jews.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
62,644
7,076
113
So.....

if it is al lso obvious, why stop free speech on the matter?

You are cowardly in that you NEVER answer this question.
Canada has already made it very clear that Hate Speech is not covered under any Charter rights. Is there a reason why you think speech motivated purely by hate is a good thing?


And your argument is I'm a coward? What a pathetic attempt.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
62,644
7,076
113
Its very transparent.
The absofuckinglutely horrid acts of the very real Holocaust do not justify present day apartheid and settler colonialism.
You can't right a wrong by committing war crimes.

And you can't claim to be calling out racism while you are actively defending apartheid.
Sorry but using a Holocaust thread to justify your own anti-semitism is pretty pathetic.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
96,392
24,837
113
Sorry but using a Holocaust thread to justify your own anti-semitism is pretty pathetic.
Accusing others of racism while you defend apartheid is pathetic.
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
53,950
11,811
113
Toronto
I am not an anti-semite, and I believe in free speech about anything.

Explain to me why you feel that opinions that you "Know" are wrong should not be heard.

Probably the 6th time I have asked, I enjoy your little wrigglings away from answering,
It's funny how you keep asking even though it's been answered several times.
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
53,950
11,811
113
Toronto
They have an opinion. You call it vile hate.

they would disagree with that label.
Which does not mean that they are not hateful. Everybody in jail claims that they're innocent.

Maybe they call it the truth. Lets hear the facts, but never ever close off the debate about anything.
We already know the facts. The occurrence of the Holocaust is a fact.

As has been stated the whole free speech argument is a red herring. The true motivation is to try to foment hate against Jews.

You can keep denying it just like all the people in jail.
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,571
6,768
113
??? Last I checked, I never claimed to be the arbiter of reality. The thread is about the GOVEERNMENT deciding as is their legal right.

And an HONEST opinion is one motivated by a desire to find out more. Holocaust deniers are purely motivated by hatred of Jews.
The Holocaust deniers must be able to express themselves in the open forum- whatever that may be. It's the only way you will know who they are and the open and free society has a way to deal with them. Nobody makes racist jokes a la 1940s anymore. Not about the Jews, not about the Blacks or the Orientals. It is no longer acceptable. Not because we have codified the opposition to their racism in law, but because the society has evolved and collectively rejects and ostracizes the Neanderthal racists. We cannot, ever, sacrifice who we are because we have nuts among us. But, we can identify them, expose them and display their hatred and marginalize them.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
62,644
7,076
113
Accusing others of racism while you defend apartheid is pathetic.
Only one of us routinely checks off most of the boxes in one of Canada's definitions of racism. You may enjoy making up your own fictional reality but your continual attempt to change threads about anti-semitism into your obsession about Israel speaks volumes.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
62,644
7,076
113
The Holocaust deniers must be able to express themselves in the open forum- whatever that may be. It's the only way you will know who they are and the open and free society has a way to deal with them. Nobody makes racist jokes a la 1940s anymore. Not about the Jews, not about the Blacks or the Orientals. It is no longer acceptable. Not because we have codified the opposition to their racism in law, but because the society has evolved and collectively rejects and ostracizes the Neanderthal racists. We cannot, ever, sacrifice who we are because we have nuts among us. But, we can identify them, expose them and display their hatred and marginalize them.
Canada disagrees with you about hate speech.

I see your point about overt racists being easier to identify than the subtle ones but allowing them the freedom to spread their shit to younger generations is not a good thing.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
96,392
24,837
113
Only one of us routinely checks off most of the boxes in one of Canada's definitions of racism. You may enjoy making up your own fictional reality but your continual attempt to change threads about anti-semitism into your obsession about Israel speaks volumes.
No, clearly I don't check any boxes.
I've challenged you on this repeatedly and you cannot name one single post that backs up your claim.

And until you stop defending apartheid, your criticisms of racism ring hollow.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
62,644
7,076
113
No, clearly I don't check any boxes.
I've challenged you on this repeatedly and you cannot name one single post that backs up your claim.
...

Still trying to distract from anti-semitism by complaining about Israel?

  • Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews in the name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion. When you argue that Palestinian attacks are justified by Israel occupying the West Bank
  • Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective — such as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions. When you have repeatedly talked about the 'zionist' narrative controls mainstream media.
  • Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, or even for acts committed by non-Jews. When you comment about extremely fringe Isdraelis as if they are representative of the whole country.
  • Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g. gas chambers) or intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of National Socialist Germany and its supporters and accomplices during World War II (the Holocaust). You're fine on this one except trying to change discussion of the Holocaust into your anti-Israel obsession.
  • Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust.
  • Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations. When you go on about AIPAC and other American Jews are looking out for Israeli interests ahead of their own country.
  • Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor. You hate that Canada has this in their definition because it is the entire basis of your obsession.
  • Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation. Another one that permeates your entire posting history.
  • Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism (e.g., claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or Israelis.
  • Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis. You've used this one a fair bit too.
  • Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel. Like when you demanded a Canadian Rabbi include statements on Palestinians in his First Nations Acknowledgement.


And pretty pathetic that you accuse me of lying about you while making up absolute crap about my opinions.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
96,392
24,837
113
Still trying to distract from anti-semitism by complaining about Israel?

  • Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews in the name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion. When you argue that Palestinian attacks are justified by Israel occupying the West Bank
  • Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective — such as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions. When you have repeatedly talked about the 'zionist' narrative controls mainstream media.
  • Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, or even for acts committed by non-Jews. When you comment about extremely fringe Isdraelis as if they are representative of the whole country.
  • Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g. gas chambers) or intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of National Socialist Germany and its supporters and accomplices during World War II (the Holocaust). You're fine on this one except trying to change discussion of the Holocaust into your anti-Israel obsession.
  • Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust.
  • Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations. When you go on about AIPAC and other American Jews are looking out for Israeli interests ahead of their own country.
  • Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor. You hate that Canada has this in their definition because it is the entire basis of your obsession.
  • Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation. Another one that permeates your entire posting history.
  • Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism (e.g., claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or Israelis.
  • Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis. You've used this one a fair bit too.
  • Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel. Like when you demanded a Canadian Rabbi include statements on Palestinians in his First Nations Acknowledgement.


And pretty pathetic that you accuse me of lying about you while making up absolute crap about my opinions.
More vague allegations.
You can't back up those claims with a single post because I've never said any of those things.

I continue to say both sides should be investigated and held to international law.
Israel should end the occupation or end apartheid or both.
The best, non-violent way forward is the Canadian way, equal rights for all.

Stop slandering and listen to what I'm saying.
End apartheid.

 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
62,644
7,076
113
More vague allegations.
...
Sure thing pal.

You're still trying to change the topic from the Holocaust to your Israel obsession. Could it be because many of the people opposed to Israel (like Iran) are also official Holocaust deniers or is it simply discussions of anti-semitism hit too close to home?

And sorry but waiting for the ICC to investigate before condemning groups like Hamas while freely accepting any blatant propaganda against Israel is just more proof of your double standard.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
62,644
7,076
113
And if you want to clear things up...

Is there any legitimate justification for Hamas etc. gunning down Jews at a West Bank bus stop? Yes or no?
Do you think groups like AIPAC push Israel's agenda at the expense of the US? Yes or no?
Do you think that an extremist party representing less that 1% of voters is supposed to represent the views or all Israelis? Yes or no?
Do you think it acceptable that Palestinian activists targeted Jewish neighbourhoods around the world to protest Israel? Yes or no?
Do you think that Western media is beholden to a pro-Israel agenda? Yes or no?
Do you think the 7.5 million Israeli Jews have the right to self-determination? Yes or no?


And your double standard is a constant part of your world-view.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Toronto Escorts