Did Rob Ford cheat?

oldjones

CanBarelyRe Member
Aug 18, 2001
24,461
12
38
He would've still won by a lot if he hadn't raised or spent all that money. People wanted change from Miller.

Adding a subway is not pissing away money.

Rob Ford has invited the public on how to tackle the $774 million budget deficit.

You can register here for that www.torontoservicereview.ca
Quite agree he's not pissing away our money. He's burying it in one single hole in the ground when it was earmarked to improve transit and relive congestion all over the city.

Oh, and let's be correct. That hole is an LRT, not a subway. The subway he has promised—like he promised gravy cutting alone would put the City in the black—is Sheppard. Which he has no money for. What he does have is almost a billion dollar deficit, because he cut taxes we needed to balance the books. We note he's already spent the surplus from the last administration.

Rob promised private developers would finance Sheppard. That's why he has to bribe them with cheap land on the Waterfront.

BTW: That link is for the survey of taxpayers that is now finished. When most of the respondants answered that they'd rather see their taxes go up than have services cut, Rob pulled the plug on his own survey, saying it was "…statistically meaningless". One wonders what he paid the consultants who designed such a poor instrument.

That was money pissed away.

The City's website has their summary, take a look at how your neighbourhood responded
 

Possum Trot

New member
Dec 7, 2009
1,093
1
0
lol...but fuji you didn't worry when the last guy (Miller) set the stage for the deficit. Have you found common sense in the last 24 hours ?
No......what was I thinking. lol
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
79,947
9
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
lol...but fuji you didn't worry when the last guy (Miller) set the stage for the deficit. Have you found common sense in the last 24 hours ?
No......what was I thinking. lol
I don't think Miller set the stage for the deficit, nor do I think Rob Ford did. All mayors of Toronto are having to deal with the costs that the Province downloaded to the cities. Property taxes are designed to support property--roads, infrastructure, things like that. It's an entirely inappropriate taxation model to support people, and the various social support services the Province downloaded to the city.

However, whereas Miller was forthright in highlighting the problem--and demanding additional revenue sources to deal with it, only some of which he got--Rob Ford has lied about his ability to pay for the agenda he has proposed.
 

oldjones

CanBarelyRe Member
Aug 18, 2001
24,461
12
38
And Rob was quite happy—though stingy with his gratitude—when he found Miller had left him with a surplus he could spend to prop up his unbalanced budget.

When d'ya s'pose Rob'n'Doug will post a budget surplus. What shape will our services be in if they ever do?
 
Last edited:

wigglee

Well-known member
Oct 13, 2010
11,197
3,465
113
Cities should not have to pay for welfare....the feds should do that.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
79,947
9
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
Cities should not have to pay for welfare....the feds should do that.
Yeah, or the province. Income replacement should be funded from income tax. Property tax should be used to pay for property maintenance, like road repair, or school building. Since the city is not permitted to raise an income tax it should not be required to pay income subsidies.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts