There is probably a copy of the child support chart on the A-G's website under "family law". There are spousal support guidelines too, but they are so complex that they cannot be accessed except by computer program.Isn't there a website that uses standard formulas adopted by the courts to calculate support? (I attended a seminar which discussed family law, and a lawyer mentioned this. It could be for child support only.)
I'm bring this post back to life cause my 3 years is up and I am thinking of giving it a whirl......Just wanted to bring the question back for anyone who might have tried or just maybe some never guide lines have come to surface.......It's very complicated....the law never clearly answered that question.. I have looked hard and long but find no other way out,,,,,lawyer did say if I wait 10 years [3 more LOL] I can go back and try to fight it,,,,,
You are my HERO .I've read the past posts here.
Many years ago I was married very briefly. I had to pay 'interim-interim support' so she can find her own apartment but she moved back to her mother's. I still had to pay $500 per month. It ended after the divorce settlement. (Unlike what someone said above in 2010 that there's no spousal support if the marriage is less than five years, but my ex-wife was fresh out of university with only a part-time job and expected to continue the lifestyle which I paid for).
Someone else said that their wife got a letter from a shrink saying she had chronic depression and couldn't work which justified continuing her support.
Well, my ex went to a shrink and got a letter saying she had PTSD (bullshit!). She fooled him (she had a Masters in Social Work). So I had to fight this bullshit. I had her resumes (which I helped her write them during our brief marriage). Got a P.I. to call her as if she was a prospective employer and she admitted that she'd love to start right away. Her dropped her jaw in shock when it was revealed at a discovery examination. That's how the divorce settlement came to be. Her lawyer supported her lies. This is despicable.
Which would be fair.....and right.A buddy of mine has been researching this recently.
He has been married around 12 years with 2 kids and she has never worked.
He told me that child support depends on how long the kids go to school so could be 18 plus 4 or 5 more years.
He says he will have to give her half of their assets and pay her alimony for 6 years.
The husband too can get remarried. Then all is good.not that I've ever been through the ringer, thank god for small miracles, but yeah, the way the system is set up there is NO reason for a woman to get remarried. She can live commonlaw or date for the rest of her life and be sitting pretty. Not to diminish the "value" of her raising the kids, or keeping the home etc but lifelong support should be stopped. Give a woman a certain amount of time to get back on her feet, get herself a job or whatever, but really, we have no problem paying people NOT to work so why would spousal support be any different?
All the horror stories I've heard about marriages falling apart (even when the woman commits the adultery) and the husbands get screwed makes me thankful that I never married.......
Quite likely she would have to pay you alimony, assuming you both continued and she made more.I'd like to jump in here with a scenario.Married 8 years.Wife is legally disabled but has been working full time since we met and makes more then i do.If we split, how much gravity would that hold if she decided lifetime disability with me paying would be a good way to screw me over?Would the fact she has steady employment for 8 years be a factor in the decision?
A buddy of mine has been researching this recently.
He has been married around 12 years with 2 kids and she has never worked.
He told me that child support depends on how long the kids go to school so could be 18 plus 4 or 5 more years.
He says he will have to give her half of their assets and pay her alimony for 6 years.
Who ever makes the most {working or not} pays the other to equal themselves........So it's only if the wife doesn't work that there's alimony to be paid? Or is it even if she works but makes less than the husband?
why? why's "equality" in wages desirable from a legal perspective (especially if no kids)??? There's got to be some moral basis for this, right?Who ever makes the most {working or not} pays the other to equal themselves........
This sentence doesn't make sense as an argument.Your post if full of completely inaccurate information and is simply not true.