I'm not a lawyer and my knowledge of NY laws or US laws are limited. I'm sure there are reasons for that transcript to appear like that.
Maybe don't admit you don't know what you are talking about and aren't willing to learn when you are trying to double down on things.
the definition is vague but bottom line is rape was ruled out. Franky is melting down over it. What was the sexual assault that fell short of rape? I mean they didn't even put "attempted rape" in there.
So you know nothing about the trial, nothing about the evidence, and nothing about the result, but have very strong feelings about it?
Because these are questions with answers!
1) "What was the sexual assault that fell short of rape?"
The penis.
In New York law as defined in the 90s (which is when the crime happened) the crime of "rape"
had to include the penis in the vagina.
Anything other than that was not rape under the law, it was sexual assault.
So, for instance, if the jury decided that Trump held a man down and skullfucked him against his will and then fucked him the ass, it would not be rape.
It would be sexual assault.
This jury, after hearing the evidence, decided they couldn't be sure Trump ever stuck his penis in Carroll's vagina.
Since then, the law has been changed, of course.
What the jury heard and decided they agreed happened
would be rape in New York state now.
(Just as it would have been in many other states, but not in Canada, since there is no crime called rape in Canada.)
2) "I mean, they didn't even put "attempted rape" in there".
There is no crime called "attempted rape" in new york.
Therefore, the judge didn't put it on the form.
So, to summarize, the jury found that Trump forced himself on her and shoved something in her vagina - they just weren't confident it was his penis.
how did both end up on the location? maybe E. Jean blue balled Donald...like i said, we're not there.
Since you weren't there, how can you say that's what happened?
