Did they catch you on camera?Esco! said:Just found out today my emission test for plate sticker renewal is only good for one farking year!!!
Stand in line for 30 minutes just to be informed of that.
I need a drink now
Esco! said:Just found out today my emission test for plate sticker renewal is only good for one farking year!!!
Stand in line for 30 minutes just to be informed of that.
I need a drink now
It doesnt make me fell better since I dont live in those placesPapi Chulo said:If it makes you feel better.. there are many places in Canada where emission tests are not required!!
Yeah really, who needs collector cars and muscle cars anyways.....better to restrict emission limits. Big business is the real culprit for pollution, but cars are the icing on the cake....wish somebody had the balls to go after the real problems.DaBig Aristotle said:How? I believe this is a good policy as a process to get better with the environment. I wish the govt would go further and eliminate cars that are older than a certain vintage. That way, the govt would also be forced to improve the metro system as people would rely on it more.
Tune-up? Bad plugs? Faulty Cat. Converter, EGR.... long list of things that could go wrong....and one that they don't tell.....if the vehicle in front is a bad polluter, it can crap out the machine for the next car.....Esco! said:Just one question, how can my 2001 pathfinder possibly emit bad emissions?????????
I would say Fireflint is right on this one. Why are there cars on the road that are within the years of testing, that you can see their exhaust at all hours of the day? There are "rice burners" and mini vans that come from the company with the "star" as their logo, that smoke down the road, burning oil, and or antifreeze, that somehow make it through an emissions test. The test is and always has been flawed. I know guys driving classic muscle cars, that have cleaner exhaust than some of the 80s and 90s 4 bangers out there, so don't go there.DaBig Aristotle said:How? I believe this is a good policy as a process to get better with the environment. I wish the govt would go further and eliminate cars that are older than a certain vintage. That way, the govt would also be forced to improve the metro system as people would rely on it more.
Maybe we could get DaBig to lobby the Gov't to make all old cars go propane. NOT!!!!!DistantVoyeur said:Yeah really, who needs collector cars and muscle cars anyways.....better to restrict emission limits. Big business is the real culprit for pollution, but cars are the icing on the cake....wish somebody had the balls to go after the real problems.
Power generation stations are the biggest polluters around, and you just have to look at Hamilton to see the next worse.....
In B.C. the emission tests are by a private company out of the states that is guaranteed a minimum fee each year.... what they don't collect at the stations, the government tops it up.
I'm sure Fantasiasfan wouldn't mind someone chucking out his Lambo, and I'll throw in my classic muscle car too.....getting rid of older cars only benefits the car companies, who use metal from refineries....stick with emissions and invest in alternate technologies....
I didn't know GM, and Ford 4, 6, and 8 cylinders were immune to creating pollution. It seems you only mention Chrysler and Japanese.pussylicker said:There are "rice burners" and mini vans that come from the company with the "star" as their logo, that smoke down the road, burning oil, and or antifreeze, that somehow make it through an emissions test. The test is and always has been flawed. I know guys driving classic muscle cars, that have cleaner exhaust than some of the 80s and 90s 4 bangers out there, so don't go there.
I didn't say either, because I could be sued for defamation, but obviously you can r/e/a/d b/e/t/w/e/e/n the l/i/n/e/s. I haven't seen that many 8cyl smoke like a certain mini van, or the two stroke imported sewing machines from overseas. I don't pay attention to 4 or 6cyl GM, as I'm not a fan, but seeing as the mini van with the "star" seems to be the number one seller in Canada, you can't miss seeing at least a couple a day smoking down the road.The Bandit said:I didn't know GM, and Ford 4, 6, and 8 cylinders were immune to creating pollution. It seems you only mention Chrysler and Japanese.
So Canadian Tire fakes the results? I don't trust the Gov't, so I'll take my chances with Joe's garage.james t kirk said:As far as I am concerned, your car fails the test, your plate should be pulled right there and then until such time as you effect repairs.
My opinion is that if your car fails, you should have to repair it to whatever extent, regardless of cost, it takes to pass the test.
If your car is a P.O.S. it should be off the road. If you need a new engine for 10 grand, then you need to spend 10 grand. No exceptions EVER.
Further, these tests should be being done by the gov't, not Joe's garage who runs the car on Methyl Hydrate, or fakes the results.
The Repair Cost Limit is not only in place to give the person driving a failed car a break, it also helps control which technicians work on the car.pussylicker said:So Canadian Tire fakes the results? I don't trust the Gov't, so I'll take my chances with Joe's garage.
A question for you. What is the poverty level at in Canada? Approx dollar amount. And how many people work for minimum wage and need to drive to get to work? And where are they going to get $10,000 from?
Sorry but I guess that was 3 questions. Oh well, the pass is a one time thing, and the Gov't is being lenient, so as to not create hardship. You can't have a second fail, but it gives you time to afford a newer engine, or another vehicle before you have to get tested again, if you are one of the unfortunate ones that works for minimum wage.
Give your head a shake.





