In a democracy do you expect that everyone is in complete agreement with the government on all issues at all times?Sorry all possible ways.
like do they not have legit grievances with the government?
In a democracy do you expect that everyone is in complete agreement with the government on all issues at all times?Sorry all possible ways.
like do they not have legit grievances with the government?
This chart proves that PP has a ceiling. And that the polling about who Canadians prefer as leader matters.
He makes a great opposition leader. But the personality that goes with that wasn't going to cut it in the nation's eyes the same way on the international stage. And yes Trump was absolutely a factor in this. That's politics. Timing is everything.
And this is why it's a MSM vs the public issue. CBC, CTV will tell you Poilievre is in trouble. Polling shows Conservatives are gaining on Liberals.I would argue that he is not a great opposition leader. He seems to rely more on stunts than actual well-thought out responses. If he is still PC leader come February, I will be shocked. But, stranger things have happened.
As for the Vassy interview, I think the fact that a year ago PP was seen as PM in waiting is sort of unfair. I mean, I expected him to win a majority, but then Trump did Trump stuff. And Trudeau resigned. And these two events fundamentally changed the conversation. PP is unlikable. From my understanding, a lot of the caucus did not like him when he was a back bencher or minister. And, just look at the folks he defeated to win the leadership. Only Jean Charest was known, and his cloud sort of sunk like 30 years ago....
That is not a secure website buddy. My anti-virus blocked me from accessing it.The kowtowing to beijing by chretian over the years has been well documented. Probably should do some research bud
When it was the other way around, Harper said it was cool, that he would face the electorate in the next election. You disagree with the godfather of the conservative-reform party?![]()
You can floor-cross for many reasons. I believe something more is going on than what they say.When it was the other way around, Harper said it was cool, that he would face the electorate in the next election. You disagree with the godfather of the conservative-reform party?
I don't necessarily disagree with you on this. The PC party is still in the rear mirror when it comes to popularity, and it might have gained a little. But, the reality is that PP is not the leader they need. And, he the odds are he will get the knife come January. Is that fair? Probably not, but they did it to Scheer and O'Toole pretty quickly. As for the Liberals poaching Cons, ask yourself why they were so eager to cross the aisle? They likely won't get a cabinet position, so what is their incentive? Could it be (and this is speculation) that they don't like the direction the party is going under PP? Could they believe that the Liberals are the party that best serves the needs of their constituents? Who knows. I do know that the protesters outside of Ma's office were like 50% Rebel "News" people and some other folks.And this is why it's a MSM vs the public issue. CBC, CTV will tell you Poilievre is in trouble. Polling shows Conservatives are gaining on Liberals.
It's a lot closer than what the media is telling you, which is why Carney is forcing his way into a Majority. He can't afford Poilievre grinding him down in Parliament.
Regarding Poilievre being a great opposition leader. I don't know, he's like a hockey player that's not well rounded, but excels in one thing so much it makes them elite and irreplaceable. His power is Question Period in Parliament. He just crushes and destroys the whole Liberal roster day-in day-out.
But outside of that, he's missing the intangibles. Even for boring economics man Carney they were able throw him in a hockey jersey and share some old goalie photos of him. The human feel means nothing but can carry a person so far in politics (See Trudeau). I don't believe the CPC has anyone in the party right now with enough charisma to justify dropping Poilievre.
Of course.Sorry all possible ways.
like do they not have legit grievances with the government?
So why do you think it's acceptable to just label any grievances from the right in Canada as Maple MAGA?Of course.
I can't think of a single instance where no one would ever have any legit grievances with the government.
That, of course, by no means implies that every grievance anyone ever has is legit.
I agree. I think there is very real tension between some populist and some mainstream old school conservatives in the party. And I think it has to do with leadership style and some policy.You can floor-cross for many reasons. I believe something more is going on than what they say.
I don't see Carney as a conservative at all. I think we've become so use to seeing Far-left politics dominate in Canada that anyone who seems rational is labelled conservative. He's maybe a moderate, but even that I'm not to sure.I agree. I think there is very real tension between some populist and some mainstream old school conservatives in the party. And I think it has to do with leadership style and some policy.
Carney is an old school conservative. And his style may be appealing to a eing if the party at this point to accomplish their personal politics.
I think after the leadership review is done you may see a few more defections if PP doubles down and what has been reported as indifference to that wing continues.
But Pee Pee claims that the media is "Liberal" and he wants to defund them. He also stated that these FreeDumb Convoy dudes were "Peaceful" when he sat down for an interview with the Far Right Juno News Host Candace Malcolm in February:
Why do you resort to straw man claims?So why do you think it's acceptable to just label any grievances from the right in Canada as Maple MAGA?
The stuff I'd like to say and expand on this, but I'll stay quiet, we're fucked.You can floor-cross for many reasons. I believe something more is going on than what they say.
I haven't and neither has anyone else as far as I know.So why do you think it's acceptable to just label any grievances from the right in Canada as Maple MAGA?
Someone should ask him the same questions today to see if he answers them any differently, especially about CBC, the FreeDUMoys and placing radical so-called "journalists" in the press gallery.But Pee Pee claims that the media is "Liberal" and he wants to defund them. He also stated that these FreeDumb Convoy dudes were "Peaceful" when he sat down for an interview with the Far Right Juno News Host Candace Malcolm in February:
Where does he get the notion that The CBC is a Liberal mouthpiece, especially as I have seen them being critical of all shades be it Liberal, Conservative and NDP. Now he wants these Far Right Media to be given access to Parliament Hill.
You've seen all the terms. A few post ago you were arguing for them.I haven't and neither has anyone else as far as I know.
I'd put Carney as center-right in a Canadian context.I don't see Carney as a conservative at all. I think we've become so use to seeing Far-left politics dominate in Canada that anyone who seems rational is labelled conservative. He's maybe a moderate, but even that I'm not to sure.
When it comes to Floor-crossings, I'll need to wait and see. You can't be under Poilievre's leadership and say "I don't like his style". That's who he's always been.
Canada is cooked.The stuff I'd like to say and expand on this, but I'll stay quiet, we're fucked.
![]()
Mark Carney
Mark Carney served as the 8th Governor of the Bank of Canada from February 1, 2008 to June 1, 2013.www.bankofcanada.ca






