G7 statement acknowledges the need to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon and explicitly supports Israel’s right to defend itself

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
104,701
30,434
113

RZG

Well-known member
Mar 4, 2007
938
1,034
93
That is true.
But so do the surrounding nations due to the fallout.
But the way it is going, if left unchecked, I wouldn't be surprised if a nuke is used by someone in the conflict at some point. Yikes!
I`m sure everyone understands the total possibilities of using nukes, even fallout coming back on one`s own country. Not to mention escalation into a global scenario in short order. How much of that is overridden by hatred and rage,.. who knows.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WyattEarp

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
24,595
20,235
113
Will Trump jump into the fray and use the bunker-busting 30,000 lb bomb dropped by a B-52, or will he listen to Tucker and stay out of it?

'Unconditional surrender': Trump's warning to Iran as sources say he warms up to US strike


his advisors, Pam Bondi, Hegseth, and Steven Miller ( also candidates for the new 3 Stooges Flick coming to Netflix soon). LMFAO
 

mellowjello

Well-known member
Jan 11, 2017
3,265
1,668
113
Nope, buts its certainly not a genocide because the outcome should be way worse if it was.
So, at that moment when only 500,000 Jews were killed in concentration camps, there was no Holocaust taking place,
is that what you're saying?
 

mellowjello

Well-known member
Jan 11, 2017
3,265
1,668
113
Consider how densely populated Gaza is, Israel dropped bombs equivalent to 6 nukes and avoided over a million deaths, how did they manage that?
This is what your bragging about....
Israel dropped 6 nukes equivalent and only murdered 400,000 instead of 1,400,000.
 

RZG

Well-known member
Mar 4, 2007
938
1,034
93
Whether Iran is 2 years, 2 months or 2 weeks away from an operational nuke is irrelevant. It can`t be allowed and has to be stopped. Iran`s often stated mission, besides death to America, and funding terrorism for decades, is to wipe Israel off the map. I don`t think they`re bluffing. The decision to be completely obliterated or not is theirs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WyattEarp

WyattEarp

Well-known member
May 17, 2017
8,963
3,058
113
Will Trump jump into the fray and use the bunker-busting 30,000 lb bomb dropped by a B-52, or will he listen to Tucker and stay out of it?

'Unconditional surrender': Trump's warning to Iran as sources say he warms up to US strike


his advisors, Pam Bondi, Hegseth, and Steven Miller ( also candidates for the new 3 Stooges Flick coming to Netflix soon). LMFAO
I would like to know what you and others think about the U.S. using the bunker-busting bombs or staying out if it. This way we have you on record as some of you are prone to criticize any Trump decision after the fact.

I always wondered why the U.S. didn't sell some bombers equipped with the bunker-busting bombs long before this day. That would have been a sharp message to the Mullahs.

In any event, there is some theory floating around that the Israeli intelligence has a way to get into the Fordow facility and destroy it. Not only is it likely a suicide mission, it is wishful thinking. It sounds like something out of a James Bond movie. Good luck Israel!
 
  • Like
Reactions: richaceg and RZG

richaceg

Well-known member
Feb 11, 2009
19,031
9,834
113
So you think killing 400,000 while destroying Gaza makes Israel look moral and just?
Shouldn't MAGA be worried that trump is starting WWIII?


now you're too emotional again....400k deaths? is that for "shock and awe" purposes? 1200 deaths vs 10k deaths sure... but you have to ask yourself what the objective was. one was to kill as much Jews just because they are jews...the other in pursuit of peace and remove terrorists... civilians in Israel were targetted...civilians in Gaza were strategically placed by Hamas to be executed. terrorists don't tell you to evacuate...that's the difference.
 

richaceg

Well-known member
Feb 11, 2009
19,031
9,834
113
I would like to know what you and others think about the U.S. using the bunker-busting bombs or staying out if it. This way we have you on record as some of you are prone to criticize any Trump decision after the fact.

I always wondered why the U.S. didn't sell some bombers equipped with the bunker-busting bombs long before this day. That would have been a sharp message to the Mullahs.

In any event, there is some theory floating around that the Israeli intelligence has a way to get into the Fordow facility and destroy it. Not only is it likely a suicide mission, it is wishful thinking. It sounds like something out of a James Bond movie. Good luck Israel!
Mossad is deeply imbed among arab countries, they also have arabs working for them. They pretty much do the dirty job for every other nation when it comes to middle east affairs where CIA and Mi6 can't penetrate.
 

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
24,595
20,235
113
I would like to know what you and others think about the U.S. using the bunker-busting bombs or staying out if it. This way we have you on record as some of you are prone to criticize any Trump decision after the fact.

First and foremost, I do not support Iran or any nation, for that matter, becoming a nuclear power. We are watching in real time just how much geopolitical chaos and intimidation a country like Russia can unleash simply by wielding the threat of nuclear weapons. That’s leverage no rogue actor should possess.

If there is credible, independently verified evidence that Iran is on the brink of nuclear capability, then yes, a targeted action to neutralize those facilities may be justified. But let me be clear: we cannot afford another Bush-era "Weapons of Mass Destruction" narrative, where the rationale for war was built on shaky intelligence and sold to the public like a used car. Another one of these mistakes will make the US look like more of a bunch of dumbasses than they look like now for electing the current clown in office.

Now, as for TRUMPUTIN, no, no, no, no, no, he doesn’t get a free pass just because he branded himself as the so-called "President of Peace."


Let’s not forget his greatest hits:


  • “No wars started under me.”
  • “No one would dare attack if I were in charge.”

Really? Because last I checked, coddling autocrats, undermining NATO, and greenlighting chaos with a wink and a tweet isn't exactly the roadmap to lasting peace.

And let’s be honest Wyatt, if Kamala Harris had been in the White House during any of this, the MAGA cult would be in full meltdown mode, screaming from every rooftop that we’re on the brink of World War III. Fox News would be running doomsday graphics between every MyPillow ad. The hypocrisy is as loud as it is shameless and you know.
 

richaceg

Well-known member
Feb 11, 2009
19,031
9,834
113
First and foremost, I do not support Iran or any nation, for that matter, becoming a nuclear power. We are watching in real time just how much geopolitical chaos and intimidation a country like Russia can unleash simply by wielding the threat of nuclear weapons. That’s leverage no rogue actor should possess.

If there is credible, independently verified evidence that Iran is on the brink of nuclear capability, then yes, a targeted action to neutralize those facilities may be justified. But let me be clear: we cannot afford another Bush-era "Weapons of Mass Destruction" narrative, where the rationale for war was built on shaky intelligence and sold to the public like a used car. Another one of these mistakes will make the US look like more of a bunch of dumbasses than they look like now for electing the current clown in office.

Now, as for TRUMPUTIN, no, no, no, no, no, he doesn’t get a free pass just because he branded himself as the so-called "President of Peace."


Let’s not forget his greatest hits:


  • “No wars started under me.”
  • “No one would dare attack if I were in charge.”

Really? Because last I checked, coddling autocrats, undermining NATO, and greenlighting chaos with a wink and a tweet isn't exactly the roadmap to lasting peace.

And let’s be honest Wyatt, if Kamala Harris had been in the White House during any of this, the MAGA cult would be in full meltdown mode, screaming from every rooftop that we’re on the brink of World War III. Fox News would be running doomsday graphics between every MyPillow ad. The hypocrisy is as loud as it is shameless and you know.
Well there it is...the TDS just wafting off your post... Trump doesn't want to be doad into a war thousands of miles across the earth. Is it in the West's interest that such dismantling is necessary? There's a reason the US are still NOT in this war after a few missile exchanges between Israel and Iran... Don't even compare Bush with Trump... Bush was eager to go to war from the get go.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: squeezer

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
24,595
20,235
113
Well there it is...the TDS just wafting off your post... Trump doesn't want to be doad into a war thousands of miles across the earth. Is it in the West's interest that such dismantling is necessary? There's a reason the US are still NOT in this war after a few missile exchanges between Israel and Iran... Don't even compare Bush with Trump... Bush was eager to go to war from the get go.

Ah, I see, so threatening to take Greenland and invade Panama was what exactly? A sightseeing tour?

Let me get this straight, Ritchie, when Trump floats the idea of seizing foreign territory by force, that’s somehow not warmongering? But when anyone else responds to credible international threats or defends allies, it’s suddenly “eager for war”?

You can’t have it both ways. Either you stand against reckless saber-rattling across the board, or you're just excusing it when your political idol does it because you've mastered the art of suck and blow at the same time.

And let’s not pretend Trump was some pacifist monk meditating in Mar-a-Lago. The man suggested using nuclear weapons on hurricanes and mused about bombing Mexico in secret. Spare me the revisionist history Ritchie and go see a dentist.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: richaceg

richaceg

Well-known member
Feb 11, 2009
19,031
9,834
113
What does that mean exactly, "just because they are Jews".
I don't know why you are even in this conversation if you don't know what I mean....have you read the Hamas doctrine? it specifically says. kill all jews, There are no statements about revenge or payback...just kill them because they are Jews.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts