G7 statement acknowledges the need to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon and explicitly supports Israel’s right to defend itself

whynot888

Well-known member
Nov 30, 2007
4,037
1,989
113
This is what your bragging about....
Israel dropped 6 nukes equivalent and only murdered 400,000 instead of 1,400,000.
It's not bragging, it's strategic. Numbers would be far less if Hamas did not operate in and around civilians.
 
  • Like
Reactions: richaceg

mellowjello

Well-known member
Jan 11, 2017
3,265
1,668
113
I don't know why you are even in this conversation if you don't know what I mean....have you read the Hamas doctrine? it specifically says. kill all jews, There are no statements about revenge or payback...just kill them because they are Jews.
I have read it.
There are no statements about killing Jews just because they are Jews either.
It's more specific to the destruction Israel/Zionism, and it's about reclaiming their land, a solution to the Palestinian problem.

My question was about "just because they are Jews.
What does that mean?
 

WyattEarp

Well-known member
May 17, 2017
8,963
3,058
113
First and foremost, I do not support Iran or any nation, for that matter, becoming a nuclear power. We are watching in real time just how much geopolitical chaos and intimidation a country like Russia can unleash simply by wielding the threat of nuclear weapons. That’s leverage no rogue actor should possess.

If there is credible, independently verified evidence that Iran is on the brink of nuclear capability, then yes, a targeted action to neutralize those facilities may be justified.
I agree. This was good, but I think the rest of your post became a anti-U.S., anti-Trump rant.

But let me be clear: we cannot afford another Bush-era "Weapons of Mass Destruction" narrative, where the rationale for war was built on shaky intelligence and sold to the public like a used car. Another one of these mistakes will make the US look like more of a bunch of dumbasses than they look like now for electing the current clown in office.
Iran has demonstrated that they are well on their way to developing nuclear weapons as well as the missiles to deliver them longer distances. For the record, I have read lots of commentary about how far along Iran is and their current rate of progress. Bottom line, they are too close to having nuclear weapons. A lot of the commentary is a matter of quibbling over details. This dance has been going on for several years.

And let’s be honest Wyatt, if Kamala Harris had been in the White House during any of this, the MAGA cult would be in full meltdown mode, screaming from every rooftop that we’re on the brink of World War III. Fox News would be running doomsday graphics between every MyPillow ad. The hypocrisy is as loud as it is shameless and you know.
There's not really a partisan matter here. Not much would have been different under Kamala Harris. The Republican party has its strong pro-Israel core. The Republican isolationists would dissent as a matter of principle not anything to do with who is in the White House. Sure they would get some airtime on Fox News as they are now.

The reality is Kamala Harris would be vehemently criticized by the progressive left if she supported Israel in its attack on Iran.
 

Conil

Well-known member
Apr 12, 2013
4,632
1,444
113
There is a difference, the Jews did not attack. They were simply slaughtered becuase they were Jews.
When Muslims kill each other they have no problems, if Jews are involved the shit hits the fan. But when Iran called for a Muslim army from many countries, nobody answered. LOL
 
  • Like
Reactions: xmontrealer

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
26,181
4,204
113
When Muslims kill each other they have no problems, if Jews are involved the shit hits the fan. But when Iran called for a Muslim army from many countries, nobody answered. LOL
Is there any problem when jews kill each other? They are the only religion that takes pride in being booted out of so many countries lol. Kinda like a homeless drug addict saying "people just don't understand me" The reason behind Isreals mass murder is not defence, its THEFT. Thou shall not covet thy neighbors house. If you are gonna believe in the burning bush nonsense, then that goes hand in hand. Yet the Zios treat the Torah like a smorgasbord. Picking and choosing.

Is there a Jewish holiday for Jewish civil wars?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Gators and Klatuu

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
32,886
6,579
113
I agree. This was good, but I think the rest of your post became a anti-U.S., anti-Trump rant.



Iran has demonstrated that they are well on their way to developing nuclear weapons as well as the missiles to deliver them longer distances. For the record, I have read lots of commentary about how far along Iran is and their current rate of progress. Bottom line, they are too close to having nuclear weapons. A lot of the commentary is a matter of quibbling over details. This dance has been going on for several years.



There's not really a partisan matter here. Not much would have been different under Kamala Harris. The Republican party has its strong pro-Israel core. The Republican isolationists would dissent as a matter of principle not anything to do with who is in the White House. Sure they would get some airtime on Fox News as they are now.

The reality is Kamala Harris would be vehemently criticized by the progressive left if she supported Israel in its attack on Iran.
"This dance has been going on for several years". Yes it has. We have been hearing how close they are for decades.

The USA has wanted regime change since 1979. This isn't partisan hyperbole, it's simple fact. Their puppet was kicked out, and they were humiliated in the hostage crisis. It also has huge oil reserves, is close to Russia, and there is also, I read somewhere, a good pipeline path.

This was never solely about the nukes. If it was, they would not be bombing media centers. That is always the precursor to a regime change. Destroy or control the airwaves. Cause panic. Threaten the capital.

The USA would happily settle for turning it into another Libya. And so would Israel and Saudi Arabia.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
32,886
6,579
113
Well there it is...the TDS just wafting off your post... Trump doesn't want to be doad into a war thousands of miles across the earth. Is it in the West's interest that such dismantling is necessary? There's a reason the US are still NOT in this war after a few missile exchanges between Israel and Iran... Don't even compare Bush with Trump... Bush was eager to go to war from the get go.
They were flying B2 test flights weeks ago. Along the border. And Trump admitted the negotiations were a purposeful distraction. And has called for surrender.

You don't demand surrender unless you are at war.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
32,886
6,579
113
I would like to know what you and others think about the U.S. using the bunker-busting bombs or staying out if it. This way we have you on record as some of you are prone to criticize any Trump decision after the fact.

I always wondered why the U.S. didn't sell some bombers equipped with the bunker-busting bombs long before this day. That would have been a sharp message to the Mullahs.

In any event, there is some theory floating around that the Israeli intelligence has a way to get into the Fordow facility and destroy it. Not only is it likely a suicide mission, it is wishful thinking. It sounds like something out of a James Bond movie. Good luck Israel!
They didn't sell them because they didn't want that genie out the bottle. Hell they admit to nerfing F-35 capabilities with rumors of a kill switch.
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
26,181
4,204
113
Not a single mention of Israel grossly illegal act of war, to attack another nation when negotiations active and underway, with no UNSC resolution. So much for the rules based order. No wonder non-G7 nations roll their eyes at this "only rules for you and the rules are what we say they are" disorder.
 

WyattEarp

Well-known member
May 17, 2017
8,963
3,058
113
"This dance has been going on for several years". Yes it has. We have been hearing how close they are for decades.

The USA has wanted regime change since 1979. This isn't partisan hyperbole, it's simple fact. Their puppet was kicked out, and they were humiliated in the hostage crisis. It also has huge oil reserves, is close to Russia, and there is also, I read somewhere, a good pipeline path.

This was never solely about the nukes. If it was, they would not be bombing media centers. That is always the precursor to a regime change. Destroy or control the airwaves. Cause panic. Threaten the capital.

The USA would happily settle for turning it into another Libya. And so would Israel and Saudi Arabia.
Wow, there's a bonus to all this.
 

Klatuu

Well-known member
Dec 31, 2022
7,586
4,835
113
The Mullahs deserve everything that is coming to them...
The vast majority of people feel the same way about the Zionist Wakanda.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mellowjello

Klatuu

Well-known member
Dec 31, 2022
7,586
4,835
113
In Frankies world, it never happened. All those videos and pictures you see are photo-shopped or AI.
Like using a cartoon? Skoob isn’t the sharpest pencil.
 

richaceg

Well-known member
Feb 11, 2009
19,068
9,828
113
They were flying B2 test flights weeks ago. Along the border. And Trump admitted the negotiations were a purposeful distraction. And has called for surrender.

You don't demand surrender unless you are at war.
He didn't "demand" surrender. He suggested it. US are on the brink of war alongside Israel if Iran does not come into the table (which looks like they won't). It's no secret where US, France & UK (perhaps Canada) will side when all this escalates. Iran's interests clashes with the western bloc. What Iran needs to understand is a war with Israel is a no win situation. a coup d etat will most likely happen before this turns world war. Until I see US war jets are on the air, this is still an Israel-Iran war.
 

Conil

Well-known member
Apr 12, 2013
4,632
1,444
113
Is there any problem when jews kill each other? They are the only religion that takes pride in being booted out of so many countries lol. Kinda like a homeless drug addict saying "people just don't understand me" The reason behind Isreals mass murder is not defence, its THEFT. Thou shall not covet thy neighbors house. If you are gonna believe in the burning bush nonsense, then that goes hand in hand. Yet the Zios treat the Torah like a smorgasbord. Picking and choosing.

Is there a Jewish holiday for Jewish civil wars?
As far as I remember you're one of the top Jew haters here on Terb. I doubt there's anyone more full of hatred than you than perhaps Frank and Klatuu/Dan very sick. But now you're taking a huge beating and hopefully they'll finish with the Iranian dictators soon and you'll have to find something else to squeal about. lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: richaceg

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
32,886
6,579
113
He didn't "demand" surrender. He suggested it. US are on the brink of war alongside Israel if Iran does not come into the table (which looks like they won't). It's no secret where US, France & UK (perhaps Canada) will side when all this escalates. Iran's interests clashes with the western bloc. What Iran needs to understand is a war with Israel is a no win situation. a coup d etat will most likely happen before this turns world war. Until I see US war jets are on the air, this is still an Israel-Iran war.
He is Bush Family now.
 

crocket

Well-known member
Nov 10, 2001
977
265
63
Iran doesn't have any nuke weapon. It's all zionist lies.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts