GOP Clings to Reagan Myth

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
32,783
3,072
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
GOP Clings to Reagan Myth
by Dave Zweifel

The six candidates for the chair of the Republican National Committee who appeared before the National Press Club last week were asked who in their opinion was the best ever Republican president.

To a man (a seventh candidate, a woman, wasn't there) they proclaimed it to be Ronald Reagan.

Astounding. Ronald Reagan the best Republican president in history?

Abraham Lincoln, the Republican who saved the Union, who freed millions of African-American slaves, who inspired generations of Americans to reach for the stars, who is immortalized on Mount Rushmore, wasn't even mentioned by the men -- two of them African-Americans at that -- who want to lead the Republicans back to power.

That speaks volumes about what has happened to the leadership of the national Republican Party and why its influence continues to wane in so much of America.

Its leaders can't wean themselves from the Ronald Reagan myth -- that somehow he was a great president and everything would be all right again if the Republicans just returned to the days when Reagan ruled.

Yes, it's a myth.

The GOP can't bring itself to admit it, but so many of today's economic problems and the divisiveness that came to mark American politics these past years can be traced back to the presidency of a man who refined the GOP's "Southern strategy" and the cultural wedge issues that flowed from it.

My first political memory of Reagan goes way back to the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr. Ronald Reagan was then the governor of California. He didn't have much praise for the slain civil rights leader, blaming his murder on "a great tragedy that began when we began compromising with law and order, and people (i.e. King) started choosing which laws they'd break."

While everyone from presidential candidate Richard Nixon to the sanitation workers in Memphis was publicly mourning King's death, Reagan was indirectly appealing to the bigotry that was so prevalent in the 1960s: that Martin Luther King Jr. deserved what he got. It wasn't that Reagan was a bigot himself, but he and his entourage, led by the infamous political hit man Lee Atwater, perfected what became infamously known as racial politics -- a slap in the face to the legacy of Republican Abraham Lincoln.

After falling short of the Republican nomination in '72 and '76, Reagan launched his 1980 run for the presidency by giving a speech advocating "states' rights" in Philadelphia, Miss., the southern community made infamous by the murder of three civil rights workers only years before.

When he did become president after the 1980 election, Reagan set out to dismantle government -- good government as well as bad. It's as if the Reaganites didn't want government to succeed and were determined to make sure it wouldn't. Except for the interruption of the Bill Clinton presidency in the 1990s, Reagan and his successors succeeded in crippling the financial regulatory system, destroying the progressive income tax system, and running up debt that wasn't even equaled in war time.

Reagan succeeded in changing American culture from one of looking out for each other to one of looking out for one's self. Taxes were bad, period. Placing checks on savings and loans and banks would hurt the economy. The more money wealthy people could make, the more that would trickle down to the little guy.

We sit here a little more than 20 years later paying the bill for the irresponsible policies and the "voodoo" economics that got their start under what wannabe leaders of the Republican Party claim is the greatest Republican president in history.

Excuse me while I cast my vote for a president who saved and built America, not one who tried to destroy it.

© 2009 The Capital Times


http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/01/14-10
 

capncrunch

New member
Apr 1, 2007
1,802
3
0
Aardvark154 said:
Poor Canada-man, apparently not an original thought in his head. :eek:
Yet another ad hominem attack.

Aardvark, my friend, if you have basis to refute the Capital Times argument, by all means let'er rip.
 

Aardvark154

New member
Jan 19, 2006
53,744
3
0
capncrunch said:
Yet another ad hominem attack.

Aardvark, my friend, if you have basis to refute the Capital Times argument, by all means let'er rip.
I have the basis that not one thought in the post comes from the poster, it's entirely cut and past the whole post could have been summarized:"Take a look the article by David Zweifel in the Capital Times [I, i.e. Canada-man] think it's the greatest thing since sliced bread."

The article itself is yet another let's attack President Reagan, funny how his reputation is actually on the rise with political historians. Yet in the left of center press he's supposed to be a pariah, while Jimmy Carter is rehabilitated?
 

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
47,008
5,823
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net
Aardvark154 said:
The article itself is yet another let's attack President Reagan, funny how his reputation is actually on the rise with political historians. Yet in the left of center press he's supposed to be a pariah, while Jimmy Carter is rehabilitated?
The article is an honest factual report on what our first brainless POTUS Reagan DID!
Of course being an apologist for this lame brain Reagan you choose to pick less credible lightweight FAUX style 'historians' from the school of Rove for your lame support of Reagan who even dad of Dubya blasted for Reagan's 'voodoo economics' which Dubya took to heights Reagan would never think possible!...:rolleyes:
 

alexmst

New member
Dec 27, 2004
6,939
1
0
Reagan was respected by the majority of Americans and had a way of connecting with voters via his televised addresses that neither Bush had. Clinton had the charisma as well, though to a lesser degree....Clinton wasn't universally liked due to issues like Monica, having Hilary as a wife, etc. G.W. Bush gave very uninspiring TV addresses. Reagan practically appointed G.W.'s father as president by approving of his bid.

Reagan had charm, charisma, a connection to all Americans (the rich who his policies supported, the poor who he gave hope of a better future to, the military who he built up and modernized without starting any significant wars, etc). He had a first class first lady whom he didn't run around on in the oval office and whom women respected. In my adult lifetime he was the best president the U.S. has had. If you met him you couldn't help but like him - that was his style. The man had class and style and honoured his country by serving it.

I'm not saying he didn't make mistakes, just that he was a fine man.
 

Garrett

Hail to the king, baby.
Dec 18, 2001
2,214
6
48
alexmst said:
I'm not saying he didn't make mistakes, just that he was a fine man.
I agree with the personal charisma statements. People who despised his politics said in person, he had a charm that was undeniable.

However, his own kids seemed to despise him (never a good sign). Iran-Contra basically brought the confession he had Alzheimers and was no longer competent. Top O'Neill said he was the dumbest man ever to be president (I believe Tip would revise his statement). Nancy was rumoured to be fucking around in the white house, and had astrologers helping to determine policy. Many feel his inaction was extremely detrimental to the spread of AIDS due to inaction and religious (anti-homosexual?) bias.

I do not think he was a fine man. I would never deny his personal charisma and his giving the Americans an image they needed. I think this is part of what they wanted with Bush: a plain talker, anti-intellectual who would flex America's aging muscles again (five minutes to bomb Russia indeed :).
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,802
134
63
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
I'll let Reagan defend himself.....

January 1981, the inaugural address:

PRESIDENT RONALD REAGAN: As we begin, let us take inventory. We are a nation that has a government, not the other way around. And this makes us special among the nations of the earth. Our government has no power except that granted it by the people. It is time to check and reverse the growth of government, which shows signs of having grown beyond the consent of the governed. Now, so there will be no misunderstanding, it's not my intention to do away with government. It is rather to make it work-- work with us, not over us; to stand by our side, not ride on our back.



January 1986, after the "Challenger" disaster that killed seven astronauts:

PRESIDENT RONALD REAGAN: The families of the seven, we cannot bear, as you do, the full impact of this tragedy. But we feel the loss, and we're thinking about you so very much. Your loved ones were daring and brave, and they had that special grace, that special spirit that says, "Give me a challenge and I'll meet it with joy."

The crew of the space shuttle "Challenger" honored us by the manner in which they lived their lives. We will never forget them, nor the last time we saw them, this morning, as they prepared for their journey and waved good- bye and "slipped the surly bonds of Earth" to "touch the face of God." Thank you.



June 1987, at the Berlin Wall:

PRESIDENT RONALD REAGAN: General Secretary Gorbachev, if you seek peace, if you seek prosperity for the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, if you seek liberalization, come here to this gate. Mr. Gorbachev, open this gate. (Cheers and applause)

Mr. Gorbachev... Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall. (Cheers and applause)



PRESIDENT RONALD REAGAN (Jan. 11, 1989): I've spoken of the shining city all my political life, but I don't know if I ever quite communicated what I saw when I said it. But in my mind it was a tall, proud city built on rocks stronger than oceans, windswept, God-blessed, and teeming with people of all kinds living in harmony and peace, a city with free ports that hummed with commerce and creativity. And if there had to be city walls, the walls had doors, and the doors were open to anyone with the will and the heart to get here.

That's how I saw it, and see it still. And how stands the city on this winter night? More prosperous, more secure, and happier than it was eight years ago. We've done our part. And as I walk off into the city streets, a final word to the men and women of the Reagan revolution, the men and women across America who for eight years did the work that brought America back. My friends, we did it. We weren't just marking time. We made a difference. We made the city stronger, we made the city freer, and we left her in good hands. All in all, not bad-- not bad at all. And so, good-bye, God bless you, and God bless the United States of America.
 

capncrunch

New member
Apr 1, 2007
1,802
3
0
onthebottom said:
I'll let Reagan defend himself
I don't think anybody's arguing that Reagan didn't own up to the mantle of "great communicator." As a professionally trained actor, he had a unique style of playing to the crowd and making his point. Granted, his address to the families of the astronauts that died in the Challenger disaster is too sentimental (and, oddly, he used Canadian poetry to make his point) but the families, and America, needed something sappy in their grief.

I think the criticism of Reagan is based on his naiveté (not being able to understand the roots of conflict in the middle east), his union-busting (firing all those air traffic controllers - rightly or wrongly, it was a hamfisted way of solving a problem) and his dunderheaded insistence on the supply-side economic nonsense.

He was also hardly a conservative. Federal spending under his watch went through the roof, and, combined with his tax cuts, created a huge deficit that was only outdone by Bush.
 
Toronto Escorts