The article is very one sided. The guy is a sympathetic "victim" because of his disability,but everyone is so quick to condemn her for what she did.
Is there any possibility that her version has some truth to it? She did disappear for a very long time, and came back very briefly as I recall. Perhaps there was an exclusive contract as she suggested?
Lets face facts here...sex workers are in it for the money. She hit the gravy train and rode it for as long as she could. This guy HAS to be held accountable for his own actions.
What is she guilty of? Lying, manipulating, exploiting...that makes her just like every woman on the planet, but obviously very good at it.
A guy that can afford to give away almost $1 Million has to have enough of a brain in his head to see when he is getting worked.