Harper Quotes

Don Draper

Cufflinks & Cognac
Nov 24, 2009
6,364
644
113
Due to the relevancy and diminishing window of time, I decided to post these Harper quotes here in the Lounge as opposed to the Politics Forum:

On Canada: “I’m starting to wonder what kind of banana republic we’re living in up here.”

On immigration: “You’ve got to remember that west of Winnipeg, the ridings the Liberals hold are dominated by people who are either recent Asian immigrants or recent migrants from eastern Canada: people who live in ghettoes and who are not integrated into western Canadian society.”

On human rights commissions: They “are an attack on our fundamental freedoms and the basic existence of a democratic society. . . It is in fact totalitarianism. I find this very scary stuff.”

On arts funding: “I do think we’ve gone too far on some of that arts and culture funding.”

On bilingualism: It “is the god that failed. It has led to no fairness, produces no unity and cost Canadian taxpayers untold millions.”

On the Liberals: “The fundamental strategy of the Liberal party for the last 30 years remains screw the West, get the rest.”

On medicare: “If we had a health-care system based on insurance and we paid for these services out of our own pocket, this would be a non-issue.”

On the French language: “That special status is needed to protect the French language in Quebec is simply false.”

On poverty: “Providing for the poor is a provincial, not a federal responsibility.”

On western alienation: “We may love Canada, but Canada does not love us . . . let’s make the province strong enough that the rest of the country is afraid to threaten us.”

On second-tier country: “We (Alberta) are the only province in Canada keeping pace with the top-tier countries in the world. Now we must show that we will not stand for a second-tier country run by a third-world leader with fourth-class values.”

On why he quit politics in 1997: “The last thing that Parliament needs is to be filled with people who have never done anything but partisan politics.”

On campaign nastiness: “You, like many Canadians, were probably very disturbed by the tone of that (2000) election campaign. Frankly, the personal attacks, unsubstantiated slanders and left-wing media fear-mongering reduced the exercise to the level of farce.”

That quote is laughable now, given that even Harper’s own supporters concede he’s the toughest, meanest campaigner they have ever seen on the federal scene.

Many of the quotes have been widely cited in the past. But, taken together, they provide a deeper insight into Harper’s beliefs and his dislike of virtually all things that are linked to Ottawa or progressive governments.


Why anyone would consider voting for this lying, xenophobic, hypocritical troll is beyond any sense of comprehension, anywhere.
 

dj1470

Banned
Apr 7, 2005
7,703
0
0
Nice of you to call 46% of Canadians ...........

How did you put it?

........ lying, xenophobic, hypocritical trolls

Simply speaking for the lying, xenophobic, hypocritical trolls

We thank you and hope you look forward to a Harper-led Conservative majority government for the next 5 years.
 

Don Draper

Cufflinks & Cognac
Nov 24, 2009
6,364
644
113
Nice has nothing to do with it.

The truth speaks for itself.

Which is something that Haper tries to prevent at every possible cost.
 

Brill

Well-known member
Jun 29, 2008
8,677
1,191
113
Toronto
I don't think 46% of Canadians are lying, xenophobic, hypocritical trolls, they just want to be led by one.
 

Tangwhich

New member
Jan 26, 2004
2,261
0
0
I post the following in the interest in fairness. Unfortunately (or fortunately, depending on your viewpoint) I was unable to find a similar list for Jack Layton. If anyone can, please post it.

Quotes from Michael Ignatieff

"Defeating terror requires violence. It also may require coercion, deception, secrecy, and violation of rights." (The Lesser Evil, 2004)

"To defeat evil, we may have to traffic in evils: indefinite detention of suspects, coercive interrogations, targeted assassinations, even pre-emptive war." (New York Times Magazine, May 2004)

"I strongly support reductions in food aid. Is that a difficult human rights problem? You bet. But that’s where I would go." (Harvard, 2005)

"The promotion of human rights in the Arab world was given by George W. Bush." (Dublin, Ireland, 2005)




What does Ignatieff believe about minorities? Well, you’re out of luck in Ignatieff’s Liberal Party if you’re a Muslim or a Ukrainian:


"Where terrorists need covert support, there are Muslim communities." (New York Times, May 2, 2004)

"Ukrainian independence conjures up images of embroidered peasant shirts, the nasal whine of ethnic instruments, phony Cossacks in cloaks and boots, nasty anti-Semites" (Blood and Belonging p. 73, 1993)

"Somewhere inside I’m also what Ukrainians would call a Great Russian and there is just a trace of old Russian disdain for these little Russians." (Blood and Belonging p. 81, 1993)



Those are pretty strong words. Claiming that Muslims are predisposed to support terrorism and that Ukrainians are “phony” Russians and “anti-Semites” is pretty offensive, but what does Ignatieff think about Canada?


"In the case of the Canadian flag, I cannot forget that it is a passing imitation of a beer label." (The Observer, 1990)

"The only thing I missed about Canada [while I was gone for 34 years] was Algonquin Park." (Macleans, 2006)

"It's disgusting in my own country, but Canadians would rather bitch about their rich neighbour to the south than pay the note." (Dublin, Ireland, 2005)

"You have to decide what kind of America you want. It’s your country just as much as it is mine." (CSPAN, 2004)

"If I am not elected, I imagine I will ask Harvard to let me back." (Harvard Crimson, Nov 30 2005)




What are Ignatieff’s policies? Take a look for yourself:


"I am a tax-and-spend, Pearsonian, Truedeau Liberal." (Toronto Star, Nov 2004)

"I’m not going to take a GST hike off the table." (December 18, 2008)

"If elected, we will have to raise taxes." (TheRecord, April 19 2009)



He was also the first Liberal to promote a Carbon Tax. In 2006, he said he wanted to "raise taxes on higher-carbon fuels." (Ignatieff’s 2006 Leadership Manual, page 15).



He was also the creator of the NDP/Bloc/Liberal Coalition. He wrote a letter to the Governor General asking her to put the coalition in power


http://stevejanke.com/WindowsLiveWriter/53dfe6560134_BF1D/image_4.png


On Dec 1 2008, Ignatieff even signed an agreement with the Bloc Quebecois to form government. This agreement will not expire until June 30, 2010. Here's a copy: http://ignatieff.me/contract.pdf


After the Coalition broke apart, Ignatieff said:


"I didn’t think it was right for someone who believes in the national unity of my country to make a deal with people who want to split the country up." (Epoch Times, March 9, 2009)
 

S.C. Joe

Client # 13
Nov 2, 2007
7,139
1
0
Detroit, USA
I hope Harper goes down in flames Monday night, LOL

And I hope who ever does replace him will tell the USA no more buddy buddies in these needless wars overseas.
 

Don Draper

Cufflinks & Cognac
Nov 24, 2009
6,364
644
113
I don't think 46% of Canadians are lying, xenophobic, hypocritical trolls, they just want to be led by one.
I agree with you Brill. I don't think this 46% are of that particular ilk.

Alarmingly, they're buying into the rhetoric of one who is and that's monumentally troubling.

Maybe the recent drop in the polls is indicative that voting for a racist, small town preacher conveying a message of doom and decline if you don't do things his way is not the way to go for a country as great as Canada.
 

FatOne

Banned
Nov 20, 2006
3,474
1
0
Much of his points are actually correct. Granted the would deny them now, but that is only because the electorate can't handle the truth.

Granted he is a hypocrite, but he is in politics, whats next slamming a doctor for healing the sick, or a prostitute for having sex with lots of different guys.

In particular
On poverty: “Providing for the poor is a provincial, not a federal responsibility.”
True, that and health care, having multiple levels of government claim responsibility has just lead to a bunch of buck passing.



On arts funding: “I do think we’ve gone too far on some of that arts and culture funding.”
I'd say true, if you disagree, I'd come over to your home and shit on your sofa for free.

On bilingualism: It “is the god that failed. It has led to no fairness, produces no unity and cost Canadian taxpayers untold millions.”
True, a 1/3 of the federal civil service is French, yet they are only 25% of the population. Signs in Ottawa and on the 401 outside of Quebec in French to help traffic along, the moment you pass the sign at the Quebec border pretty much saying Welcome to Quebec, go fuckyour blockhead, it is all French. Can't count how many times I've been on the 40 in west end Montreal [still pretty anglo] and see those French signs overhead with seemingly important notices and not have a clue what they mean.
 

FatOne

Banned
Nov 20, 2006
3,474
1
0
While we are at it.

Iggy doesn't show up to votes at Parlement, that is bad, when MPs run for election but go on vacation and have not even quit their jobs in a different province, that is OK as long as you do it under the NDP banner

Corporate tax cuts don't create jobs, in fact they encouraged Electrolux to move a factory to the US according to one ad... yet cutting the small corp tax rate will help create jobs

He will will introduce a home heating federal sales tax rebate to give your household budget a break, and I recall him bleating on about high gas prices yet he wants to reduce carbon emissions. Granted his PhD is in Poly Sci, but he should know about supply and demand, if he wants people to use less oil the best thing would be a price increase.


This is not to suggest that he is worse than anyone else, but that they all suck.

New Liberservitive. Coneral Democratic party. The American Republicrates, and Dempublicans. Anyone who can be so partisan not to see it is a fool.
 

GPIDEAL

Prolific User
Jun 27, 2010
23,333
13
38
Don, you seem to forget that the Liberals didn't carry out their promise to abolish the GST or tear up the Free Trade Agreement, and got elected.

Then the lie that the Gun Registry would only cost $10 million dollars when it ballooned to $ 2 Billion.

What about that EI fiasco - was that a billion dollars unaccounted for?

And then sticking it to the provinces with the reduction in transfer payments?

Then the Quebec ad scandal.

I haven't seen Harper or the Conservatives defraud the populace like the Liberals.

If people want to focus on the personality, that's their choice, but a vote for the Conservative Party is an all round better decision IMO.
 

someone

Active member
Jun 7, 2003
4,307
1
38
Earth
Much of his points are actually correct.
I was thinking the same thing. It says something when a poster thinks his attacking Harper and actually posts reasons to vote for Harper.
 

Don Draper

Cufflinks & Cognac
Nov 24, 2009
6,364
644
113
I was thinking the same thing. It says something when a poster thinks his attacking Harper and actually posts reasons to vote for Harper.
No one needs to attack Harper. He's doing fine cooking his own goose all by himself.

Of course, before he serves it, he'll try to tell you it's turkey and not goose. That he killed it and plucked it himself when in fact he had someone else do it for him. He would also like you to think that he paid for it when he actually went through everyone's pockets and took all the $ he could when no one was looking.

When you do complain that it's not goose but turkey, that it's not fully cooked and if you try to eat this, you'll end up sick and nauseous, then he'll just prorogue dinner so you can't have a further say about it.

If any of the above listings by Harper are considered 'reasons to vote for him', well that would be akin to a delusional addict saying: "It doesn't matter if the needle is infected. The heroin will be worth it anyway!"

The collective 'you' can vote for whoever you want. The vicious, petty and damaging agenda always comes out after the voting results are in, never before. We all know this. The essence of the democratic voting system is always choosing from the lesser of the evils.

I just want what's in the best interest for Canada.

Stephen Harper is not it.
 

oldjones

CanBarelyRe Member
Aug 18, 2001
24,479
12
38
I don't think 46% of Canadians are lying, xenophobic, hypocritical trolls, they just want to be led by one.
Haven't a clue where the 46% number came from, but when Canadians have been put to the actual question, the party led by Harper has only ever barely managed to squeak past 33%. Repeatedly.

So far ordinary Canadians are showing themselves more sensible than Cons like Harper who count one in three as a winning majority. A view the rest of us have so far denied, and appear about to do so again.

And If there were a ballot choice for PM, I'd bet Harer himself would score lower than his party.
 

Don Draper

Cufflinks & Cognac
Nov 24, 2009
6,364
644
113
Unfortunately, you have been so brainwashed by leftwing propaganda, you have no idea what that is.
Sadly, the statement made by your lack of knowledge reflects very strongly upon your misguided conception of leadership.
 

5hummer

Active member
Sep 6, 2008
3,787
5
38
EYE Toronto published an interesting article on Harper, regarding his Toronto roots (which I was unaware of).

Harper was born and raised in Toronto. Moved West.
And, then suddenly, went Right-wing-Westerner Anti-Toronto OntarioSuck-up-to-USA.

Yet, the Harper supporters here in Ontario still want to support him (I guess Ontario Harper supporters love the abuse).
 

someone

Active member
Jun 7, 2003
4,307
1
38
Earth
Sadly, the statement made by your lack of knowledge reflects very strongly upon your misguided conception of leadership.
Perhaps someday you will grow up and learn to think for yourself.
 

Don Draper

Cufflinks & Cognac
Nov 24, 2009
6,364
644
113
Perhaps someday you will grow up and learn to think for yourself.
Perhaps someday you'll mature enough to understand that Prime Ministers do not:

1) Lie about the deficit

2) put his government in a contempt of parliament position

3) prorogue parliament twice: a) To save himself from the afghan detainee issue. B) To save himself from the coalition proposition. (Off he runs like a coward to the GG begging: please, please, please.)

4) spend 15 billion plus on fighter jets

5) Create the G20 Fiasco

6) Protects other liars in his party in order to cover up his own lies as well. (Bev Oda should be held accountable for her actions.)

6) Slapping the face of Canadian military families by getting rid of the process of lowering the flag on parliament every time a soldier tragically dies in Afghanistan.


I don't need to see any more. This is enough damage already. Not to mention his 'doom and gloom' small town preacher mentality if we don't do things his misguided way.

Canada would be better off with someone deliberately trying to damage us than someone pretending to be a leader with good intentions. His facade of 'Statesman' is the most vicious disguise of all.

Lying Criminal.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts