The Porn Dude

Harvey Weinstein the serial sexual harasser.

Smallcock

Active member
Jun 5, 2009
13,648
21
38
Captain Suck Ass (Ben Affleck) is coming under increasing fire for helping Weinstein through his earlier troubles with his accusers. That makes more sense to me than Rusty since Affleck's career was floundering at the time - Gigli is a classic on a level with The Room. Weinstein is good to his friends and went on the resurrect his career.

Some may be infuriated by this but it's time to separate truth from opportunity.

I think Affleck will be fine. He's a movie star, not an ugly producer that works behind the scenes.

As for female celebrities sleeping their way to the top. I thought this was a foregone and widely accepted conclusion. What sacrifices did one have to make to beat out all the other tens of thousands of wannabes that go to Hollywood every year with big dreams? Maybe they did it on talent alone but the real world is rarely so benevolent. I don't hold it against any of these women. If you know the game, use what you have to your advantage. I think most of the women that made it to the top this way would see it as the greatest decision they ever made.

The vagina is not sacrosanct. It's used as a means to an end all the time (not even necessarily monetary all the time - could be as simple as sleeping with another dude when mad at a boyfriend or to get back at an ex-boyfriend). Look no further than TERB for the monetary version.
 

Insidious Von

My head is my home
Sep 12, 2007
42,881
9,427
113
trump "locker room" talk is not sexual assault. that topic is dead for months
I couldn't agree more, Trump is as pure as a new born lamb...shame...shame...shame.

I hear he's given up spooning with Ivanka for the missionary with Mike Pence.

As for the handsome propagandist Ben Affleck, it depends on how his next film is received. From the trailer, Justice League looks like Camembert to me.
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
33,000
3,203
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com

Smallcock

Active member
Jun 5, 2009
13,648
21
38
So - as I understand it - the women harassed by Weinstein are overvalued snowflakes who don't deserve to be covered by the media? And in any case, women bring it all on themselves by being vulgar and talking about their pussies and having big asses and twerking? And by being rude in churches in Russia?

Help me with this one. Because I read the article you were so proud of and thought it was just 10th rate garbage wherein the journalist simply assembled a bunch of random incidents and people who "trigger" right wing guys like you and threw them willy-nilly onto a page with the rider that somehow women are to blame for getting themselves raped and don't deserve much sympathy.

Maybe if you put this in your own words, we'll see if you end up writing exactly what I just wrote above in this post.

Here's the sub text, Smallcock. I was discussing this thread with an escort friend of mine on Twitter. She told me that she was already aware of the thread and had been discussing it with a couple dozen of her escort friends and they all found your attitudes and your treatment of Charlotte - and your attitude to women in general - to be so gross and foolish that they had decided to group ban you, if you ever tried to book any of them. You may be about as popular as Harvey Weinstein right now, at least among Toronto escorts.

So this is your chance to address all this.
No, the women harassed by Weinstein are not snowflakes. They're part of a culture and industry that promotes sex as a means to status, fame, and fortune. Many of them bask in it and sometimes willfully prostitute themselves in public (e.g. Miley) or in private (with guys like Weinstein) to achieve their goals. Some don't or are more selective in whom they prostitute themselves to, and when they call out a guy like HW's some of the others jump on the bandwagon - even though they had the money, power, and clout to do so on their own but didn't.

As for your escort Twitter "friend" (are you still required to pay her by the hour on "friend" time?), what is the point of even mentioning your convo with her? You're smart enough to know that a group ban is a melodramatic exercise in futility. I'll be sure not to mention my name is "Smallcock" on TERB during the booking process *rolls eyes*. They'll take my money as quickly as they take yours, my good friend. If popularity determined cock size, mine would finally be huge.

 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
33,000
3,203
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com

Insidious Von

My head is my home
Sep 12, 2007
42,881
9,427
113
Cazzelino, you completely didn't get "The Weinstein Girls" clip.

It wasn't meant to be politicized but some couldn't help but gloat. Some are condoning the culture that allowed Weinstein to thrive yet spit roast him for being a liberal. Regardless of political leaning he's a total scumbag, Jennfier Lawrence and Lindsey Lohan were "more than likely" teenagers when he grabbed their pussies. As Gomer Pyle would say, "Goooooolly Sargent, that's fucked up".

And lately Hollywood has been moving away from megalomaniacal producers, Wienstein's star was in twilight before this scandal broke. These days it's all about the alliance. In the early 00's, Christopher Nolan would not have become a director for rent if he wasn't looking for one.

Italian men don't drink tea - that's respect!

 

Smallcock

Active member
Jun 5, 2009
13,648
21
38
Cazzelino, you completely didn't get "The Weinstein Girls" clip.

It wasn't meant to be politicized but some couldn't help but gloat. Some are condoning the culture the culture that allowed Weinstein to thrive yet spit roast him for being a liberal. Regardless of political leaning he's a total scumbag, Jennfier Lawrence and Lindsey Lohan were "more than likely" teenagers when he grabbed their pussies. As Gomer Pyle would say, "Goooooolly Sargent, that's fucked up".

And lately Hollywood has been moving away from megalomaniacal producers, Wienstein's star was in twilight before this scandal broke. These days it's all about the alliance. In the early 00's, Christopher Nolan would not have become a director for rent if he wasn't looking for one.

Italian men don't drink tea - that's respect!

Didn't Linsey Lohan defend Weinstein?
 

Insidious Von

My head is my home
Sep 12, 2007
42,881
9,427
113
Harvey Weinsein delayed Jessica Chastain's career because she didn't have the look to be current movie star.

...Italian men can't resist Irish redheads.

 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
33,000
3,203
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com

Smallcock

Active member
Jun 5, 2009
13,648
21
38

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
33,000
3,203
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
33,000
3,203
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
Another one. Hollywood director James Toback is being accused of sexual harassment by

http://www.latimes.com/entertainmen...al-harassment-allegations-20171018-story.html


He prowled the streets of Manhattan looking for attractive young women, usually in their early 20s, sometimes college students, on occasion a high schooler. He approached them in Central Park, standing in line at a bank or drug store or at a copy center while they worked on their resumes.

His opening line had a few variations. One went: “My name’s James Toback. I’m a movie director. Have you ever seen ‘Black and White’ or ‘Two Girls and a Guy’?”

Probably not. So he’d start to drop names. He had an Oscar nomination for writing the Warren Beatty movie “Bugsy.” He directed Robert Downey Jr., in three movies. The actor, Toback claimed, was a close friend; he had “invented him.” If you didn’t believe him, he would pull out a business card or an article that had been written about him to prove he had some juice in Hollywood. That he could make you a star.

But first, he’d need to get to know you. Intimately. Trust him, he’d say. It’s all part of his process.

Then, in a hotel room, a movie trailer, a public park, meetings framed as interviews or auditions quickly turned sexual, according to 38 women who, in separate interviews told the Los Angeles Times of similar encounters they had with Toback.

During these meetings, many of the women said, Toback boasted of sexual conquests with the famous and then asked humiliating personal questions. How often do you masturbate? How much pubic hair do you have? He’d tell them, they said, that he couldn’t properly function unless he “jerked off” several times a day. And then he’d dry-hump them or masturbate in front of them, ejaculating into his pants or onto their bodies and then walk away. Meeting over.

The women’s accounts portray James Toback as a man who, for decades, sexually harassed women he hired, women looking for work and women he just saw on the street. The vast majority of these women — 31 of the 38 interviewed — spoke on the record. The Times also interviewed people that the women informed of the incidents when they occurred.

As is often the case, none of them contacted the police at the time. When contacted by The Times, Toback denied the allegations, saying that he had never met any of these women or, if he did, it “was for five minutes and have no recollection.” He also repeatedly claimed that for the last 22 years, it had been “biologically impossible” for him to engage in the behavior described by the women in this story, saying he had diabetes and a heart condition that required medication. Toback declined to offer further details.

The women interviewed during The Times’ investigation offered accounts that differed from Toback’s recollections.
 

Smallcock

Active member
Jun 5, 2009
13,648
21
38
he was mainly responding to what i wrote - that's transparent - but he has too much hubris to respond directly because he claims he has me on "ignore" now lol. but he just couldn't resist responding to my points, since his whole life seems to depend on arguing with people on this forum.

he also needs to familiarize himself with strawman arguments, since that's what his points are almost always based off of.

neither of us said that when women get raped, they should just "stop making a fuss." i said

1) if you did get raped, it's horrible, but it's not something that you need to keep dwelling on, 20 years later. this needless fixation on all the "male predators" in our society by the current feminist dogma is like a way for people to maintain infinite victimhood status, when in reality, it's not healthy for anyone to hold onto that trauma.

2) what's being counted as "sexual assault" these days is anything from actual rape to being complimented on the streets for your appearance to "man-terrupting" and "man-spreading" to the big one: having sex with someone when you didn't feel like it but you didn't actively stop it either. fucking people you didn't want to fuck - it's just the next step up from engaging in polite conversation with someone you don't like for the sake of civility. it happens and it's annoying, but sometimes it's what you do to get thru a socially awkward situation. at least, that's how i see it when i had sex with that guy who slept over that time who i didn't want to fuck, but i did it anyway because it was just the easier thing to do at the time. do i fixate on that moment again and again and again as that one moment i lost all my integrity? no. i really don't give a fuck, because it was something i agreed to. if i really didn't want to do it, i could have just got up and told him to stop, and he would have. but i don't resent anyone if i knew i made the decision to be passive on purpose and for a reason.

the guys who don't stop when you tell them to are indeed assholes and yes maybe even rapists. and i'm not saying any of this to discount or comment on charlotte's experience because i didn't read about it and it happened before i joined this thread. but i am talking about people like mattress girl at columbia, whose story was so riddled with lies, it's absurd. it's these stories and this narrative that keeps circulating today that anytime a woman makes a claim that a guy raped her, she is 100% believable. this narrative influences women to believe they were raped even when they may not have been.

they're teaching young girls in school today that women are always oppressed, powerless, and that men are always dangerous and just waiting to rape you. what kind of effect do you think that has on a person's memories? it's been proven that women are more susceptible to false memories than men (https://broadly.vice.com/en_us/arti...ent-women-confess-to-crimes-they-didnt-commit). that's why i take these modern feminist narratives always w a large grain of salt.

this article presents a good summary of what i mean: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/201...ve-taught-schools-fuels-anxiety-young-women/#
You're absolutely right. I also agree that real rape (e.g. as in Chartlotte's purported case) is cheapened by the 'rape culture' narrative promoted these days.
 

Insidious Von

My head is my home
Sep 12, 2007
42,881
9,427
113
David Duke expressed his op on Weinstein...does he know where his children are?

Leib, son of Nat!

 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
33,000
3,203
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
“These people are full of the devil. These people can’t even be reasoned with,” Rodney Howard-Browne said in a sermon over the weekend. “They have already given their soul to the devil. Are you with me? These people go through seances, these people drink blood, these people sacrifice children.”

“They sacrifice children at the highest levels in Hollywood. They drink blood of young kids. This is a fact. That’s why the next thing to be exposed will be all the pedophilia that is going to come out of Hollywood and come out of Washington, D.C. The human sacrifice and the cannibalism has been going on for years.”

“Many of the Hollywood actors that you go see on a screen, what you don’t know, they bring a witch, they do a big seance right there on the set and they worship devils and they allow devils to come into them before they take the part of what they’re going to act,” he said. “It’s a fact what I am telling you.”

 

Smooth60

Member
Jan 9, 2017
299
2
18
they're teaching young girls in school today that women are always oppressed, powerless, and that men are always dangerous and just waiting to rape you. what kind of effect do you think that has on a person's memories? it's been proven that women are more susceptible to false memories than men (https://broadly.vice.com/en_us/arti...ent-women-confess-to-crimes-they-didnt-commit). that's why i take these modern feminist narratives always w a large grain of salt.

this article presents a good summary of what i mean: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/201...ve-taught-schools-fuels-anxiety-young-women/#

This statement is false. Nothing of the sort has been proven. The article states as much a couple of time, from there being little to no research done in the area to Researchers stating that there is no difference between genders, eg Loftus.
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
33,000
3,203
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
Toronto Escorts