Harvey Weinstein the serial sexual harasser.

[SuperCharge]

Funny how it took a couple of decades for this to hit the fan. I guess careers are more important than women abuse. But, the again, this is the same crowd that gives standing ovation to Stalinists and Polanski.

Because Weinstein RUNS hollyweird and the DemonKKKrats and that would take COURAGE, which we know those guys don't have! So they let the abuse continue, for decades and these same ppl have the audacity to go on for months about a hot mic conversation of Trump BUT YET still adore Wild Willy Clinton. Imagine! The hypocrisy is astounding really.

The silence is deafening on the late night talk shows.

 

[IM469]

Funny how it took a couple of decades for this to hit the fan. I guess careers are more important than women abuse. But, the again, this is the same crowd that gives standing ovation to Stalinists and Polanski.

No different than Trump or Cosby. If you want to know how - just listen to Trumps explanation on the bus.

Harvey's wife.

How disgusting. Nothing says 'Rich guy' more than that picture.

 

[lomotil]

The casting couch is live and well but just is going through a face lift to tweak conform to today's litigious social media world. For every lady or gentleman that will not, several will and this is not about to change anytime soon. Hollywood is an illusion based on sleaze with many unfortunate power imbalances, opportunists and those willing to advance their careers any way that they can.

 

[james t kirk]

The New Yorker is now claiming that 3 women have now come forward saying he raped them.

This isn't going to blow over.

 

[jcpro]

No different than Trump or Cosby. If you want to know how - just listen to Trumps explanation on the bus.



How disgusting. Nothing says 'Rich guy' more than that picture.

LOL! A lot different. I have no doubt that the rich and famous use their position, but what makes this and Cosby different is the people willing to cover up their sleaze.

 

[SuperCharge]

LOL! A lot different. I have no doubt that the rich and famous use their position, but what makes this and Cosby different is the people willing to cover up the sleaze.

Sexual harassment EVIDENCE apparently doesn't mean as much to whining liberals as sexual harassment ACCUSATIONS - set up by the Left!

 

[jcpro]

Another example of the powerful man taking advantage of a semi-starving young actress is the Al Pacino - Jessica Chastain relationship. Chastain probably did more than just the Dance of the Seven Vails in Salome and Alfredo probably didn't give it a second thought. Today she refers to him as her acting Godfather, I wonder what she says about him in private.

First you get the money, then you get the power, THEN you get the women- Tony Montana.

 

[Phil C. McNasty]

First you get the money, then you get the power, THEN you get the women- Tony Montana

Talk to ma lawya

 

[Smooth60]

 

[jcpro]

In any case, Charlie Sheen doesn't look so bad, any more. At least he paid cash.

 

[mandrill]

When Gwyneth Paltrow was 22 years old, she got a role that would take her from actress to star: The film producer Harvey Weinstein hired her for the lead in the Jane Austen adaptation “Emma.” Before shooting began, he summoned her to his suite at the Peninsula Beverly Hills hotel for a work meeting that began uneventfully.

It ended with Mr. Weinstein placing his hands on her and suggesting they head to the bedroom for massages, she said.

“I was a kid, I was signed up, I was petrified,” she said in an interview, publicly disclosing that she was sexually harassed by the man who ignited her career and later helped her win an Academy Award.

She refused his advances, she said, and confided in Brad Pitt, her boyfriend at the time. Mr. Pitt confronted Mr. Weinstein, and soon after, the producer threatened her not to tell anyone else about his come-on. “I thought he was going to fire me,” she said.

Rosanna Arquette, a star of “Pulp Fiction,” has a similar account of Mr. Weinstein’s behavior, as does Judith Godrèche, a leading French actress. So does Angelina Jolie, who said that during the release of “Playing by Heart” in the late 1990s, he made unwanted advances on her in a hotel room, which she rejected.

Angelina Jolie said that in the late 1990s, she rejected Mr. Weinstein’s unwanted advances in a hotel room. Credit Stefan Rousseau — WPA Pool/Getty Images

“I had a bad experience with Harvey Weinstein in my youth, and as a result, chose never to work with him again and warn others when they did,” Ms. Jolie said in an email. “This behavior towards women in any field, any country is unacceptable.”

A New York Times investigation last week chronicled a hidden history of sexual harassment allegations against Mr. Weinstein and settlements he paid, often involving former employees, over three decades up to 2015. By Sunday evening, his entertainment company fired him.
Several days ago, additional actresses began sharing with The Times on-the-record stories of casting-couch abuses. Their accounts hint at the sweep of Mr. Weinstein’s alleged harassment, targeting women on the way to stardom, those who had barely acted and others in between. Fantasies that the public eagerly watched onscreen, the women recounted, sometimes masked the dark experiences of those performing in them.

The encounters they recalled followed a similar narrative: First, they said, Mr. Weinstein lured them to a private place to discuss films, scripts or even Oscar campaigns. Then, the women contend, he variously tried to initiate massages, touched them inappropriately, took off his clothes or offered them explicit work-for-sex deals.

In a statement on Tuesday, his spokeswoman, Sallie Hofmeister, said: “Any allegations of non-consensual sex are unequivocally denied by Mr. Weinstein. Mr. Weinstein has further confirmed that there were never any acts of retaliation against any women for refusing his advances. He will not be available for further comments, as he is taking the time to focus on his family, on getting counseling and rebuilding his life.”

Even in an industry in which sexual harassment has long persisted, Mr. Weinstein stands out, according to the actresses and current and former employees of the film companies he ran, Miramax and the Weinstein Company. He had an elaborate system reliant on the cooperation of others: Assistants often booked the meetings, arranged the hotel rooms and sometimes even delivered the talent, then disappeared, the actresses and employees recounted. They described how some of Mr. Weinstein’s executives and assistants then found them agents and jobs or hushed actresses who were upset.

His alleged behavior became something of a Hollywood open secret: When the comedian Seth MacFarlane announced Oscar nominees in 2013, he joked, “Congratulations, you five ladies no longer have to pretend to be attracted to Harvey Weinstein.” The audience laughed. According to a 2015 memo by a former Weinstein Company executive that The Times previously disclosed, the misconduct continued.

More established actresses were fearful of speaking out because they had work; less established ones were scared because they did not. “This is Harvey Weinstein,” Katherine Kendall, who appeared in the film “Swingers” and television roles, remembers telling herself after an encounter in which she said Mr. Weinstein undressed and chased her around a living room. Telling others meant “I’ll never work again and no one is going to care or believe me,” she reasoned at the time, she said in a recent interview.

Ms. Paltrow, 45, is now an entrepreneur, no longer dependent on securing her next acting role. But she emphasized how much more vulnerable she felt at 22, when Mr. Weinstein had just signed her up for a star-making part. On a trip to Los Angeles, she received a schedule from her agents for the hotel meeting with Mr. Weinstein.

There was no reason to suspect anything untoward, because “it’s on the fax, it’s from C.A.A.,” she said, referring to Creative Artists Agency, which represented her.

When Mr. Weinstein tried to massage her and invited her into the bedroom, she immediately left, she said, and remembers feeling stunned as she drove away. “I thought you were my Uncle Harvey,” she recalled thinking, explaining that she had seen him as a mentor.

After she told Mr. Pitt about the episode, he approached Mr. Weinstein at a theater premiere and told him never to touch Ms. Paltrow again. Mr. Pitt confirmed the account to The Times through a representative.

Soon after, Mr. Weinstein called Ms. Paltrow and berated her for discussing the episode, she recalled. (She said she also told a few friends, family members and her agent.) “He screamed at me for a long time,” she said, once again fearing she could lose the role in “Emma.” “It was brutal.” But she stood her ground, she said, and insisted that he put the relationship back on professional footing.

Even as Ms. Paltrow became known as the “first lady of Miramax” and won an Oscar for “Shakespeare in Love” in 1999, very few people knew about Mr. Weinstein’s advances. “I was expected to keep the secret,” she said.

In 1999, Ms. Paltrow won an Oscar for her role in “Shakespeare in Love,” a film produced by Mr. Weinstein, center. Credit Monica Almeida/The New York Times

Like several of the other women interviewed for this article, she felt she had to suppress the experience. She praised Mr. Weinstein publicly, posed for pictures with him and played the glowing star to his powerful producer. Yet their work relationship grew rockier over the years, she said, and she distanced herself. “He was alternately generous and supportive and championing, and punitive and bullying,” she said.

Now, with the process of tallying the size and scope of Mr. Weinstein’s abuse allegations underway, Ms. Paltrow and others said they wanted to support women who had already come forward and help those in similar situations feel less alone.

“We’re at a point in time when women need to send a clear message that this is over,” Ms. Paltrow said. “This way of treating women ends now.”
Tomi-Ann Roberts

In 1984, when Ms. Roberts was a 20-year-old college junior, she waited tables in New York one summer and hoped to start an acting career. Mr. Weinstein, one of her customers, urged her to audition for a movie that he and his brother were planning to direct. He sent scripts, then asked her to meet him where he was staying so they could discuss the film, she said in an email and a telephone interview.

When she arrived, he was nude in the bathtub, she recalled. He told her that she would give a much better audition if she were comfortable “getting naked in front of him,” too, because the character she might play would have a topless scene.

If she could not bare her breasts in private, she would not be able to do it on film, Ms. Roberts recalled Mr. Weinstein saying. (Asta Roberts, her mother, said in an interview that Ms. Roberts told her the story shortly after the episode.)

Ms. Roberts remembers apologizing on the way out, telling Mr. Weinstein that she was too prudish to go along. Later, she felt that he manipulated her by feigning professional interest in her, and she doubted that she had ever been under serious consideration. “I was nobody! How had I ever thought otherwise?” she asked.

Today she is a psychology professor at Colorado College, researching sexual objectification, an interest she traces back in part to that long-ago encounter. She said that over the years she had had trouble watching Mr. Weinstein’s films. With a new release, “I would always ask, is it a Miramax movie? ”

Rosanna Arquette

In the early 1990s, Mr. Weinstein asked Rosanna Arquette to stop by the Beverly Hills Hotel to pick up a script for a role.

Born into a family of actors, Ms. Arquette had already starred in a hit film, “Desperately Seeking Susan,” and “New York Stories,” and would go on to perform in films including “Crash” and television shows ranging from “Ray Donovan” to “Girls.” (Her account also appeared in The New Yorker.)

At the reception desk, she was told to head upstairs, which she found odd.

Mr. Weinstein was in a white bathrobe, complaining of neck pain and asking for a massage, according to Ms. Arquette and Maria Smith, a friend she told soon afterward. Ms. Arquette said she tried to recommend a professional masseuse, but Mr. Weinstein grabbed her hand and pulled it toward his crotch. She immediately drew away, she said.

He boasted about the famous actresses he had supposedly slept with — a common element of his come-on, according to several other women who had encounters with Mr. Weinstein. “Rosanna, you’re making a big mistake,” he responded, she said.

She refused. “I’m not that girl,” she recalled telling him on the way out. “I will never be that girl.”

The part went to someone else, and Mr. Weinstein’s representative pointed out that he did not produce the movie. Later, Ms. Arquette was in the Miramax film “Pulp Fiction” but said she avoided Mr. Weinstein.

“Welcome to the Miramax family,” Mr. Weinstein told Katherine Kendall in 1993, she said. She was 23, and about that time he was selling his small movie company to Disney, which supplied the cash that would turn it into a cultural force.

After a meeting set up by her agent, he gave her scripts, including for the film “Beautiful Girls,” and invited her to a screening, which turned out to be a solo trip with Mr. Weinstein to a cinema near Lincoln Center in Manhattan. Afterward, he asked if they could swing by his apartment to pick something up.

Ms. Kendall said she was nervous, but it was daytime, and she relaxed when she saw pictures of his wife on the wall. “He’s keeping it professional, he makes me a drink, we talk about movies and art and books for about an hour,” she recalled. “I thought: He’s taking me seriously.”

He went to the bathroom, came back in a robe and asked her to give him a massage, she said. “Everybody does it,” he said, according to Ms. Kendall, and mentioned a famous model’s name. She refused; he left the room, and returned nude, she said.

“He literally chased me,” she said. “He wouldn’t let me pass him to get to the door.”

Ms. Kendall said his advances had a bargaining quality: He asked if she would at least show her breasts, if nothing else.

She said no to all of it, she recounted. “I just thought to myself: ‘I can’t believe you’re doing this to me. I’m so offended — we just had a meeting,’” she said. (Her mother, Kay Kendall, said in a brief interview that her daughter had told her the story at the time.)

Ms. Kendall appeared in the film “Swingers,” distributed (but not produced) by Miramax, and has worked on and off as an actor since then. But she said the episode had dampened her enthusiasm for the business.

“If this is what it takes, I can’t do it,” she said.
Judith Godrèche

In 1996, the French actress Judith Godrèche said she was invited up to Mr. Weinstein’s suite, where he asked to give her a massage. After she said no, she recalled, he argued that casual massages were an American custom. Credit Jeff Vespa/WireImage, via Getty Images

When Mr. Weinstein invited Judith Godrèche to breakfast at the Cannes Film Festival in 1996, she had no idea who he was. At 24, she was already a star in France, and a new film she was in, “Ridicule,” was opening the festival. He had just acquired the movie and said he wanted to discuss it.

They had breakfast at the Hotel du Cap-Eden-Roc, joined by a female Miramax executive. After the executive left, Mr. Weinstein invited Ms. Godrèche up to his suite to see the view, and to discuss the film’s marketing and even an Oscar campaign, she said in an interview.

“I was so naïve and unprepared,” she said.

Upstairs, he asked to give her a massage, Ms. Godrèche said. She said no. He argued that casual massages were an American custom — he gave them to his secretary all the time, Ms. Godrèche recalled him saying.

“The next thing I know, he’s pressing against me and pulling off my sweater,” she said. She pulled away and left the suite. (Alain Godrèche, her father, said in an interview that his daughter told her about the episode the next morning.)

Seeking advice, she later called the female Miramax executive, who told her not to say anything, lest she hurt the film’s release. “They put my face on the poster,” she said.

“This is Miramax,” she said. “You can’t say anything.”

Since then, Ms. Godrèche has starred in films in France and the United States. Like Ms. Paltrow, she felt she had to maintain a rapport with Mr. Weinstein, and sent him friendly emails inquiring about party invitations and potential work. “I tried to negotiate the situation over the years, and negotiate with myself and pretend it kind of never happened, ” she said.

“I wish I’d had someone to talk to, to say, ‘How do you deal with this?’”


https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/10/us/gwyneth-paltrow-angelina-jolie-harvey-weinstein.html

 

[mandrill]

DAWN DUNNING
In 2003, Ms. Dunning was doing small acting gigs, attending design school and waitressing in a nightclub where she met Mr. Weinstein.

The 24-year old was wary, but Mr. Weinstein was friendly, professional and supportive, she said, offering her a screen test at Miramax, inviting her to lunch and dinner to talk about films and even giving her and her boyfriend tickets to see “The Producers” on Broadway.

Then his assistant invited her to a meal with Mr. Weinstein at a Manhattan hotel. Ms. Dunning headed to the restaurant, where she was told that Mr. Weinstein’s earlier meeting was running late, so she should head up to his suite.

There was no meeting. Mr. Weinstein was in a bathrobe, behind a coffee table covered with papers.

He told her they were contracts for his next three films, according to Ms. Dunning. But she could only sign them on a condition: She would have to have three-way sex with him.

Ms. Dunning said that she laughed, assuming he was joking, and that Mr. Weinstein grew angry.

“You’ll never make it in this business,” she said he told her. “This is how the business works.”

Ms. Dunning fled, she said, and when the assistant called her the next day, she hung up. She told her father, Rick Dunning, of the episode within a few months, he said in an interview.

“I was like: Maybe this is how the business works,” she said. She left acting soon after and became a costume designer.

Ellen Gabler contributed reporting.

 

[SuperCharge]

Harvey Weinstein audio recording of harrassement of Ambra Battilana Gutierrez trying to get her into his hotel room, just leaked.

 

[mandrill]

Funny how it took a couple of decades for this to hit the fan. I guess careers are more important than women abuse. But, the again, this is the same crowd that gives standing ovation to Stalinists and Polanski.

If it was YOUR career that was going to be wrecked, you might hesitate for a couple of decades too. It's easy to stomp your little foot when all you have at stake is a post on TERB. The women who have come forward now are either established mega stars or out of the film business completely. And they have only stepped forward because others took the same difficult step.

Now I realize that scoring points against "lefties" and film world people on TERB is very, very important to you. But put yourself in these women's shoes for a second or two. Not only would their careers have been ruined, but everyone would have closed ranks around Weinberg and protected him. Why? - Because he is / was a major Hollywood rainmaker. You play his game or you get kicked out of Hollywood. And don't think it's going to change very much now. Weinberg may have been outed. But there are a thousand Weinbergs and the other 999 are still operating.

Personally I think that every Weinberg or Cosby who is nailed is a step forward. But play for work is as old as the hills in the entertainment world and that isn't going to change.

And none of the women named in the article ever cheered for Polanski, let alone Stalin. That belongs in your own little fantasy world.

 

[Phil C. McNasty]

Somebody by this man a razor, please

 

[Phil C. McNasty]

If it was YOUR career that was going to be wrecked, you might hesitate for a couple of decades too. It's easy to stomp your little foot when all you have at stake is a post on TERB. The women who have come forward now are either established mega stars or out of the film business completely. And they have only stepped forward because others took the same difficult step.

Now I realize that scoring points against "lefties" and film world people on TERB is very, very important to you. But put yourself in these women's shoes for a second or two. Not only would their careers have been ruined, but everyone would have closed ranks around Weinberg and protected him. Why? - Because he is / was a major Hollywood rainmaker. You play his game or you get kicked out of Hollywood. And don't think it's going to change very much now. Weinberg may have been outed. But there are a thousand Weinbergs and the other 999 are still operating.

Personally I think that every Weinberg or Cosby who is nailed is a step forward. But play for work is as old as the hills in the entertainment world and that isn't going to change.

And none of the women named in the article ever cheered for Polanski, let alone Stalin. That belongs in your own little fantasy world.[/COLOR

Wow oagre, you must be a Hollywood insider.
You know all the right people

 

[mandrill]

https://www.thedailybeast.com/it-took-a-village-to-pull-off-harvey-weinsteins-reign-of-terror

The Daily Beast on the intimidation and retaliation campaigns conducted by Weinstein, his company, his PR thugs and his lawyers on any woman who complained about him.

 

[art van dele]

Harvey Weinstein audio recording of harrassement of Ambra Battilana Gutierrez trying to get her into his hotel room, just leaked.

We are all sick in our own ways but this guy is a very very sick individual. Something must've happened to him when he was a kid.

 

[Phil C. McNasty]

I'm sorry, listening to CNN right now this man is nothing more than a rapist.

He used vulnerable struggling actresses to suck his cock

 

[anon1]

Somebody by this man a razor