March 9, 2009. Enough time has passed to see the "V" shape of the recovery.rafterman said:Yes.
Are you willing to bet the farm on that?LatinDancer said:March 9, 2009. Enough time has passed to see the "V" shape of the recovery.
LatinDancer said:March 9, 2009. Enough time has passed to see the "V" shape of the recovery.
I love that...shapes.LatinDancer said:March 9, 2009. Enough time has passed to see the "V" shape of the recovery.
I agree with you that we won't see 2007 levels anytime soon, and that there are dips within an upward trend. But since I am a trader not a buy and hold investor, I am not riding stocks up and down. And the four week rally has been very nice, with the financials being particularly good. I liked BAC at $4 and did nicely with it. Have traded WFC between 12 - 16, MET and MFC (on NYSE) with buy -sell differentials of $4. My recent buys have been in gold (ABX and AUY) with recent 15% pull backs last week, as well as pharma (CELG @39, BMY @20). I must admit that I missed the RIMM opportunity because I got into Nokia (NOK) instead at 12, a much cheaper stock.JohnLarue said:One must be careful interpreting charts.
Look at them but only as pert of the big picture
The V could very well turn into the middle part of a W without the last part of the letter for a very long time.
What will drive a market is REVENUE & EARNINGS growth & until they show a sign of improving a major movement back to 2007 levels will not happen
Hahaha, good answer!mmouse said:Yes. Or no. Flip a coin. Nobody has a fucking clue.
***mmouse said:Yes. Or no. Flip a coin. Nobody has a fucking clue.
Do traders make money on a consisitent basis? Seems like a trader has to make TWO correct decisions: when to buy and when to sell. A buy and hold investor has to make only ONE correct decision: when to buy becuase he never sells.LatinDancer said:But since I am a trader not a buy and hold investor, I am not riding stocks up and down.