Hmmm

[Hollywoodladies.ca]

Paul is probably going to have my head for posting this but I can't help myself. I was reading a few of the threads on the " new cer board" and thought I'd go check them out. I understand the concept of a board that doesn't allow advertisers, and even think that it's a great idea, however......

Since I am directly affiliated with an agency and am unable to post on that site, I wish to invite "morrisdacat" to call me directly at our agency phone number and try to justify this nonsense to me. Or to deal with this matter on this board.

I have never before (nor is it in my nature) confronted anyone on any review board who wishes to express an opinion as I believe that that is their right, however I couldn't let this go.....

Happy reading!

Steph


Junior Member posted June 07, 2002 12:36 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Decided to take one for the team so I tried Hollywood escorts New "legend" Chantelle.
Chantelle arrived to my hotel very nicely dressed. Things were good from the get go.
After some small talk I initiate dthe lead and we lose our clothes.
She begins with a pretty good CBJ.
I knew something was amis when she didn't take off her panties.
After about 15 minutes of CBJ I suggested we move to the main event.
Guess what?
No main even because she said she was having her monthly event?
Why are you working then?
Well didn't the agency tell you?

No.

I phone HWE and tell her to get dressed and demand the money back. After some back and forth between the operator /Chantelle/ Me THEY decide to refund 1/2 of the money.
No way!!!!

I want full refund.

Operator says driver is right on his way up.

Fine.

In comes in the Rob Van Damme wannabe and he says I won't get nothing back.

I say then no one leaves.
Chantelle becomes visiblly upset and decides for a full refund because me and Gino boy are about to go fisticuffs right in the hotel room.

As things heat up Chantelle gives back half the money.

So there goes the scam.

They thought I would have been intimidated by the grease ball. Wrong.
The only reason I didn't make it get uglier was because I was a married man.
If I wasn't Chantelle and Gino would have been thrown outside the window.

I am PISSED.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posts: 2 | Registered: May 09, 2002

 

[VatoLoco]

Gino

Are you the "Gino" the guy is talking about?? What's the deal, would your agency really do this?? I dont know so that
is my reason for asking. I never being with any Hollywood lady but am considering a couple.

I think that any costumer who is in this kind of situation should get his money back, maybe no 1oo % but at least 75%
plus a discount if they book an appointment with another lady on the spot.Assuming this review might be bogus, since from what I have read CER makes up hateful reviews and lies,
Wouldn't it be the ladies fault in the first place, since if she knew she was on period she still accepted the call???
I think she should have just told the agency she was unavailable or at least let the guy know b4 things got hot and sweaty.

Shouldnt she give back all the money ( except MAYBE the driver's fee ) since she literally decieved him, and should have being honest with both agency and client??

I am just curious as what kind of business policies you guys have, hope you can answer my questions.

Thanks Steph.

 

[Hollywoodladies.ca]

It's not that I believe anyone would take this seriouly...except for some poor unsuspecting gent who happens across this junk and decides to take it at face value. A lot of reputable agencies have been taking a beating over there!

Now it may be more prudent to turn the other cheek, however, there are some people who may have ( and rightfully so) serious misgivings about dealing with an agency who allegedly sends a "beefy" driver to the room after an unsatisfied client makes a complaint. That implies a threat to a client if he "dares" to be unsatisfied and that is something I won't tolerate.

Steph

 

[Hollywoodladies.ca]

Ripped....

VatoLoco just made my point for me!

Steph

 

[VatoLoco]

I did??

I said I was just curious, I didnt take it literally.
My questions were hypothetical and to find out what you guys are all about. I never called your agency b4 so curiosity is
in my opinion the right side-effect after reading the above.
I still would like to know what you think about those two questions Steph. I think they are legitimate question from a possible client.

 

[Hollywoodladies.ca]

VatoLoco

The reason I didn't respond to your question is becaue I don't want to turn this into a debate about what an agency should and shouldn't do under specific circumstances.

Hollywoods reputation should speak for itself. We pride ourselves on our level of client satisfaction.

Suffice it to say this type of thing has never happened!!!!

Steph

P.S.
If you do have serious concerns I am always available by phone...don't hesitate to call.

 

[VatoLoco]

Thanks Steph!

I think I will call you and understand your reasons for not wanting to turn this into a debate; however, you could always PM me since I am not sure you would like me to call just to find out more about the agency. I really wouldnt want to feel like I'm wasting your time over the phone, if you say it's possible then I will, otherwise PM me.

Just a thought, I dont think you would need to send a beefy driver with me I think just an average guy if not the girl would be enough ( I have to go to the gym lol )

 

[revolver]

Vatoloco

I think you're missing the point. Steph, I believe was posting this as an example of the fake reviews that are posted on that board. The suggestion being that this incident never happened and was posted in an effort to discredit the agency and/or the SP.

 

[Gyaos]

That "Rob Van Damme" line was funny, but RVD is the "whole F'n Show" if you remember ECW.

I give Hollywood an A+. Excellent service, if not the best I've had in ON.

Gyaos

 

[Dr. Faust]

Re: CER So-called Review of Hollywood

Just finished PM'ing Fred re that CER/Hollywood Bullshit. Confirm 100% with prior posters on Hollywood's positive reviews & comments. Only had one negative experience-should have done some RESEARCH first & listened to Steph. Subsequently Paul offered a "$ back if not fully satisfied" with another lady from Hollywood & can report that she & Paul "Restored my faith in humanity!!" (Do some searching & you'll find out!!)

Agree w/Steph for exposing this BULLSHIT. Expect she knew what kind of response/support she'd get... they trashed Select too! Who is/are these pathetic little techno-weasels???

Anyway, Father's Day is coming up & a certain blonde in black lingerie w/a bottle of Champagne sounds like a HELL of a good gift to me!

 

[KBear]

Was going to post, but I thought I best not, as it seems based on Dr. Faust post that there is a negative comment tracking system in place, perhaps available to the business the promoters.

Think it is better to stick to idle chit chat.

 

[Fred Zed]

Hon...

The main focus ought to be that anything posted, on Natural's board, is either copied from another board or fabricated. I'd be surprised if the guy who posted the "review" has even met the girl.

If you check carefully the writing style closely matches that of "thenatural" who also happens to be the owner of the board. My guess is that he is the author of that "review" and ofcourse it's just a fabrication.

The owner of that site ( and main "reviewer" ) will go to any length to attract some attention to himself and his site. IMO this is just the tip of the iceberg - expect to see a lot more bullshit and more stolen and fabricated reviews at that site during the coming days !!

 

[sara@select]

not surprising

Given all that I have heard about this whole situation I find it almost laughable...Steph is a class act and so is Hollywood- all the praise they receive can attest to that.
It seems to me that the only solution is to IGNORE the goings on over THERE..... I have a feeling that FRED is right- this is just the tip of the iceberg! As his wrath grows we are bound to hear more,just as things are bound to get intense and ugly. Why give an even louder voice???
I am equally sorry for Steph and Hollywood, as I am for all the ladies and agencies that are the targets of such malice and falsehoods.
I understand why Steph needed to address this issue but I think we need to stop giving this board and its "famed" residents our attention and get back to TERB!
Lastly, yes- I have seen all written- including "select slams." Just not worth the bother.......

Sara x

 

[Dr. Faust]

Negative Comment Tracking System??

Don't understand your comment? There is a "Search" function on this board(relatively standard tech) which pulls up ALL the posted comments-negative AND positive- based on keyword(s) of 4 characters or more for ANY member who initiates the search function.

My post was as a result of getting back to this Board & "Hobby" after a "Biz Blitz" (no time) and finding out about the existence of the CER Board on Reviews-going to it & seeing evidence of Content Piracy-pathetically misspelled rewrites etc. and then reading a supposed "Review" of Hollywood's performance in a business situation-which differed dramatically from my own experiences. THEN I saw Sara's "hmmmn" thread & posted my comments!

I also emailed Fred re the surprising similarity between prior hmmn/petea etc.'s poor grammar & a similar "Hotshot Investor" poster on Stockhouse few years back named "Shifty" / "Shiftee" -
-well-named-he was exposed & turned out to be a 22 year old unemployed kid living in the basement of his Toronto parents house!

As I said "Who ARE these pathetic little techno-weasels?"

 

[Dr. Faust]

Sorry Steph it was YOUR Thread!

Sorry Steph-it was YOUR thread, not Sara@ Select's -although they took a run @ Select too! Been out too late!

Here's the problem-the internet is EVERYWHERE-so if I'm "Surfing & Sleepless in Seattle" prior to visiting Toronto on business- what the Hell do I know from 1. TERB, 2. MBB and/or 3. CER? Certainly the apparent technological competence, overall design & the amount/supposed quality of content appears higher on 1 & 2 than on #3 CER; but I'm "shopping" & trying to make a price/ quality/service value judgment from 3,000 miles away- therefore I WILL take local market comment negatives into account.

Also, appearance/calibre of website is NOT synonymous with corporate quality-consider the various dot.com fiascos and (closer to home!) consider the fact that BUDGET ESCORTS has a well-designed site with amusing, high quality illustrations on its' splashpage - so "Caveat Emptor" on that one!

So Bullshit like this CER can hurt 1. Potential New Business and ,
2. Potential Out-of-town Business-and the"posters" all seem to be rude, ill-educated mysogynists!!