How do you carry your cellphone as it can cause cancer ?
- Thread starter yahoo40
- Start date
Oh yeah, I was "carrying" it for you
click here & read about the red meat to see specifics Sorry about the Skoal.
Now you know why I was calling so often (clickable)
Elaborate on what you mean by carrying it and are you referring about talking or texting. I have been a cell phone subscriber for 20 years but I do not use my phone frequently (2-3 times a week) and it is only for emergency basis and I do carry it in my pocket.
you answered the question in the last line ... so your cell phone is in a body contact all the time for last 20 years . very dangerours if you ask me
yeah, we all asked you. I sure did.
Here: buy some good mounting hardware and
NSFW (IMPORTANT NOTE AT THE END)
let it hang
or let it hang
or let it hang
(NOT SAFE FOR WORK)
IMPORTANT: Take out the Skoal first
Since the original quote said 10-15 years for cancer and queen has been carrying it for 20 years, then good on queen for living with cancer for 5-10 years.
Seriously though,
1: the report is scare mongering BS (I'll eat my words if it turns out to be a reputable medical study)
2: photons of visible light have 10000 times the amount of potential dna damaging energy as microwaves
3: microwaves, radio waves, infrared, light waves, UV radiation are constantly around us no matter what - not carrying a cell phone wont change anything
4: We'll all die of some kind of cancer if we live long enough, whether caused by toxins, chemicals, radiation, or plain old age, so even if this was true, no big deal.
we can all make jokes but there is some valid discussion on this subject. we should be concerned. you are all aware of two things?
1. we are no supposed to touch the phone to our head. should be a 15 mm gap. who does that?
2. us gov't and cell phone manufacturer tests measure the radiation using that gap.
as for kevin trudeau, just because the quacks have seen another money-making opportunity doesn't make it untrue. on the other hand, it doesn't help the serious researchers. i think we'll see more serious studies as the years go by. one thing is certain: there is a lot of money involved (like cigarettes) and the pressure will be to poo-poo any negative results.
1. we are no supposed to touch the phone to our head. should be a 15 mm gap. who does that?
2. us gov't and cell phone manufacturer tests measure the radiation using that gap.
as for kevin trudeau, just because the quacks have seen another money-making opportunity doesn't make it untrue. on the other hand, it doesn't help the serious researchers. i think we'll see more serious studies as the years go by. one thing is certain: there is a lot of money involved (like cigarettes) and the pressure will be to poo-poo any negative results.
I figure if Sanja Kupta doesn't ridicule the report. There something to it. I don't think i'd be sticking my neck out if I said he's more knowledge about this type of research than every single member on this BB, even FUJI, and light years ahead of the posers and wannabe's, especially FUJI.
Only use it when I'm driving, on the train, outside or traveling, and keep it in a case on my belt. The rest of the time I have it turned off and in a drawer.
We can't do much in the short term about all the chemicals in the environment, may of which can give rise to cancer, but we can do something about the cell phone radiation. That's like saying people get hit by vehicles all the time, so why cross at intersections or cross walks. or walk facing the vehicle on a road with no sidewalks.
Some types of HPV a sexually transmitted disease can increase the chance of cervex and penis cancer also probably throat and anal cancers if you like the mouth or ass fucking.
All good points, and your last was exactly what was raised by many. How is it that the phone companies can make the claim that the phones are safe, with FCC approval, if no long term studies exited when they made these statements?The distinction to wonder about is ionizing versus non-ionizing radiation. Ionizing radiation strips atoms from the molecular structure of tissue (causing cancer) whereas non-ionizing radiation heats tissue without atom stripping. Cell phones emit radio frequency radiation, which is non-ionizing. So the real question is what effect does long-term exposure to non-ionizing radiation have? Put differently, what might be the long term effect of exposing your bodily tissue to excess heat? Now your brain and your eyes dissipate excess heat less efficiently than, say, your dick and groin. Think about it! Hence it might be that carrying your phone close to your dick might be a different issue than using your phone close to your head.
But like all testing of long term effects, you might need a long term study, which brings with it the issue that after that long time you might find a nasty affect but it has been a long time that people have been doing the thing you did a long term study of. So the issue itself may have changed, from not doing something not yet a habit, to stopping doing something that is a habit. The solution is clearly to toss a coin and hope for the best
