
This Isn’t Just Bread — It’s a Microbiome Miracle 🍞🦠
You know sourdough? That tangy bread that’s taken over artisan bakeries?Well… turns out, it's not just tasty — it’s loaded with lactobacillus bacteria.But he...
I need some milk.
Even better unpasteurized but the government banned that because the don't want us getting too healthy.Milk also effectively controls cancer. If I take my drug cocktail, in the morning, without milk I'll get eaten up with heartburn. That's dangerous, it could bring on Esophageal cancer.
Milk, it does a cancer patient good.
Do you have something valuable to add @Jenesis or are you just doing your usual 'peanut gallery' act?Even better unpasteurized but the government banned that because the don't want us getting too healthy.
I added it. I think your comment is funny. So I laughed. Here, is this better?????Do you have something valuable to add @Jenesis or are you just doing your usual 'peanut gallery' act?
That's funny, I didn't notice any meaningful contribution but you definitely made your presence noticed. So unpasteurized milk being healthy is a governmentI added it. I think your comment is funny. So I laughed. Here, is this better?????
Just FYI - I often laugh at government conspiracy therioies without commenting on this board. I have no interest in useless debates on the subject.
You're a little emotional this morning. Maybe look into that.
Thinking the government bans it to keep us unhealthy would be considered a conspiracy by most.That's funny, I didn't notice any meaningful contribution but you definitely made your presence noticed. So unpasteurized milk being healthy is a government
conspiracy? Very interesting.
Emotional? What emotion was I expressing? I made a query but I didn't detect any emotion. Clearly rejection is a sore spot for you. Definitely check that out.
The punchline is that you claimed the government banned it because they do not want us to get healthy.Even better unpasteurized but the government banned that because the don't want us getting too healthy.
This….The punchline is that you claimed the government banned it because they do not want us to get healthy.
I'm in Jens' corner!
Just for the record, I love my skimmed store-bought milk.
Facts before nonsense is usually the way to go-
Unpasteurized (raw) milk is often illegal because it can contain harmful bacteria that cause serious illnesses. Pasteurization, a process of heating milk to kill these bacteria, is mandatory for retail sale in many places, including Canada. This is a public health measure to protect consumers from foodborne illnesses.
Here's why raw milk is considered risky:
While some argue for the potential benefits of raw milk, the risk of illness outweighs these claims, and pasteurization remains a crucial public health practice.
- Harmful bacteria:
Raw milk can contain dangerous bacteria like Salmonella, E. coli, Listeria, and Campylobacter, which can cause vomiting, diarrhea, fever, and potentially life-threatening complications like kidney failure.
- Vulnerable populations:
Children, the elderly, pregnant women, and people with weakened immune systems are particularly susceptible to severe illness from these bacteria.
- Outbreaks:
Raw milk consumption has been linked to outbreaks of foodborne illnesses, including those caused by E. coli.- Pasteurization's role:
Pasteurization effectively eliminates these harmful bacteria while preserving the nutritional value of milk.- Public health:
The potential for illness from raw milk consumption has led to regulations requiring pasteurization to protect the public.
You laughed at my post which for the most part is insignificant. Two other members agreed with my post so by the numbers my message was well received so why would I be hurt by the opinion of someone like you?Thinking the government bans it to keep us unhealthy would be considered a conspiracy by most.
And definitely emotional. What emotion? You are butt-hurt your post got laughed at.
and your definition of rejection is skewed. You commenting and not ignoring is clearly the opposite of rejection. It is reaction and again, and emotional one at that. And all because your still upset by yesterdays interaction. Which is even more hilarious then your theory of banned milk.
Seeing you white knight for Jennie is no surprise. Birds of a feather as they say. It's cute that you know how to use google and are willing to believe the first thing that popped up. It just shows your naivety. If raw milk was so unhealthy why did we consume it daily for decades before pasteurization? When handled properly raw milk is more nutritious than pasteurized. Maybe next you could regale me with a lecture on the benefits of fluoridated water?The punchline is that you claimed the government banned it because they do not want us to get healthy.
I'm in Jens' corner!
Just for the record, I love my skimmed store-bought milk.
Facts before nonsense is usually the way to go-
Unpasteurized (raw) milk is often illegal because it can contain harmful bacteria that cause serious illnesses. Pasteurization, a process of heating milk to kill these bacteria, is mandatory for retail sale in many places, including Canada. This is a public health measure to protect consumers from foodborne illnesses.
Here's why raw milk is considered risky:
While some argue for the potential benefits of raw milk, the risk of illness outweighs these claims, and pasteurization remains a crucial public health practice.
- Harmful bacteria:
Raw milk can contain dangerous bacteria like Salmonella, E. coli, Listeria, and Campylobacter, which can cause vomiting, diarrhea, fever, and potentially life-threatening complications like kidney failure.
- Vulnerable populations:
Children, the elderly, pregnant women, and people with weakened immune systems are particularly susceptible to severe illness from these bacteria.
- Outbreaks:
Raw milk consumption has been linked to outbreaks of foodborne illnesses, including those caused by E. coli.- Pasteurization's role:
Pasteurization effectively eliminates these harmful bacteria while preserving the nutritional value of milk.- Public health:
The potential for illness from raw milk consumption has led to regulations requiring pasteurization to protect the public.
You keep living in your delusion if it makes you feel better.You laughed at my post which for the most part is insignificant. Two other members agreed with my post so by the numbers my message was well received so why would I be hurt by the opinion of someone like you?
I sent you packing yesterday on the other post and most people would have just left it at that. You posted a full reply and when I didn't reply that wasn't good enough for you so you decided to troll my different post today. Either you're bothered by the rejection or you developed a crush on me and this is your juvenile way of expressing yourself. Both are equally unappealing.
Many people, particularly children and infants died due to contaminated raw milk, back in the day.If raw milk was so unhealthy why did we consume it daily for decades before pasteurization?
Oh was that my goal? Ok, feel free to reply so you can have the last word since that seems to be significant to you. Please make sure you take the time and make the effort to laugh at my future posts so that I know you notice me and I feel acknowledged by you.You keep living in your delusion if it makes you feel better.
Sorry I didn't let you get the last word. Just more for you to be butthurt about I guess.
![]()
Sure if handled improperly and not refrigerated there can be health risks, just like lots of other foods that haven't been banned.Many people, particularly children and infants died due to contaminated raw milk, back in the day.
It is why they introduced pasteurization.
It isn't a conspiracy to keep you unhealthy by denying you a few vitamins and minerals - which are largely retained during pasteurization anyway.
If you insist. Whatever I can do to make you feel better since you were so butthurt before.Oh was that my goal? Ok, feel free to reply so you can have the last word since that seems to be significant to you. Please make sure you take the time and make the effort to laugh at my future posts so that I know you notice me and I feel acknowledged by you.![]()
In his mind the government must have purposely made people mishandle to kill babies and children just to make sure they could get away with banning it so that they can keep people unhealthy.Many people, particularly children and infants died due to contaminated raw milk, back in the day.
It is why they introduced pasteurization.
It isn't a conspiracy to keep you unhealthy by denying you a few vitamins and minerals - which are largely retained during pasteurization anyway.
I had a friend of mine drop off some unpasteurised goats milk the other day...Tastes great and I know I'm getting all the benefits of milk that are destroyed when it's pasteurized. I'm especially interested in the benefits of lactoferrin that it brings.Seeing you white knight for Jennie is no surprise. Birds of a feather as they say. It's cute that you know how to use google and are willing to believe the first thing that popped up. It just shows your naivety. If raw milk was so unhealthy why did we consume it daily for decades before pasteurization? When handled properly raw milk is more nutritious than pasteurized. Maybe next you could regale me with a lecture on the benefits of fluoridated water?![]()