OR did Crosby get special treatment from both the on ice officials and the league office for this?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4wqR17KrLKw
IMO, this sure looks like an infraction of the "Third man in rule" but of course it is up to the discretion of the referee...it sure looks like that Atlanta player was tied up pretty well before Crosby got involved. An altercation does not necessarily mean thta the gloves were dropped already but maybe that was why he only got two minutes...
As the rule reads:47.16
Third Man In - A game misconduct penalty, at the discretion of the
Referee, shall be imposed on any player or goalkeeper who is the first
to intervene (third man in) in an altercation already in progress except
when a match penalty is being imposed in the original altercation. This
penalty is in addition to any other penalties incurred in the same
incident.
This rule also applies to subsequent players or goalkeepers who
elect to intervene in the same or other altercations during the same
stoppage of play.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4wqR17KrLKw
IMO, this sure looks like an infraction of the "Third man in rule" but of course it is up to the discretion of the referee...it sure looks like that Atlanta player was tied up pretty well before Crosby got involved. An altercation does not necessarily mean thta the gloves were dropped already but maybe that was why he only got two minutes...
As the rule reads:47.16
Third Man In - A game misconduct penalty, at the discretion of the
Referee, shall be imposed on any player or goalkeeper who is the first
to intervene (third man in) in an altercation already in progress except
when a match penalty is being imposed in the original altercation. This
penalty is in addition to any other penalties incurred in the same
incident.
This rule also applies to subsequent players or goalkeepers who
elect to intervene in the same or other altercations during the same
stoppage of play.