Is that ok?

[K Douglas]

Kristy, don't worry you were right to be angry. The booker should have been upfront and honest about the duo with his girlfriend. For one most SP's charge more if its a duo. Second you don't know what else this guy has up his sleeve, next he may want you to do something you're not comfortable with. You did the right thing getting out of there.

Assholes like this ruin it for the rest of us "nice" guys just looking for some fun.

 

[Carrie Moon]

But it doesn't have too. That is my point. There are only two people that know what the hell that guy was thinking, read or assumed...

give me a break. When you go to an all-inclusive resort it means no tipping.. menu included. It does not mean 2 people for the price of one. Would you say the same thing if he had another buddy or 2 with him for her to see???

 

[Dr.Vastu]

Girls I bow the head before you. You are so fearless and daring. To go to unknown place to meet an unknown man which sometimes looks like Quasimodo… (I mean myself). Who knows what they are thinking about? I understand that some things are illegal in this business, but anyway, Kristy, maybe to write a little bit more about your service in your website? For example: “I am available for men only”

 

[Gentle Ben]

.........seem to be missing is that she doesn't mind duos, ................................, why not try to benefit financially from it.

Re read her first post,What I read is, She doesn't mind if people want to do duos, it doesn't bother her, but she's not into it herself.

............
I don't mind duos, fetishes, domination, etc - I don't mind people do that. But I'm not in it and that's kinda ok even with my job. .............

 

[hunter001]

give me a break. When you go to an all-inclusive resort it means no tipping.. menu included. It does not mean 2 people for the price of one. Would you say the same thing if he had another buddy or 2 with him for her to see???

I am not sure what your b*tching about. All I said was she might consider the wording on her website. Clearly dude was wrong no matter who was there. Whatever...

 

[Carrie Moon]

I am not sure what your b*tching about. All I said was she might consider the wording on her website. Clearly dude was wrong no matter who was there. Whatever...

I'm not ''bitching'... I'm disagreeing with you. Now you say the guy was clearly wrong.. when before you said ''all-inclusive' was vague. Which is it?

Either he was wrong.. ie knew damn well it wasn't included and hoped to get an extra service without asking or he was new to the english language and assumed all-inclusive meant he could get anything he wanted and her response was an over-reaction to an ''easy mistake anyone could make''.

I think most of us assume the former whereas you were making claim for the latter. I disagreed with you.

 

[hunter001]

I'm not ''bitching'... I'm disagreeing with you. Now you say the guy was clearly wrong.. when before you said ''all-inclusive' was vague. Which is it?

Can you f***ing read or just post.

The guy was totally wrong; however; you might consider changing...



This could mean a lot of different things to different people. You might want to link it some how with services you consider "all inclusive".

I didn't say that was the reason or I knew what the person was thinking (unlike you who knows what everyone else is thinking). I just saw something that might be ambiguous on her website.



Learn to actually read the WHOLE post ffs.

 

[genintoronto]

I think that Carrie Moon has a point here.

No one would assume that the guy may have misread the 'all inclusive' price, and I bet no one would have suggested that Kristy should have just acted casual and added an extra fee for the extra person in the room if that second person had been a man rather than a woman.

But somehow, because the extra person was a woman, some seem to think it is less assholish of that client, or are more ready to give him the benefit of the doubt.

I'm with Carrie Moon here. I don't believe one second that he misread the "all inclusive" price to mean that he could bring an extra guest for the same price. I bet he knew very well what he was doing, and was probably hoping that once she'll be confronted with the situation, that she would just go along with it rather than have her time wasted and lose the money for the booking, and then played dumb when she was obviously not happy to see the woman in the room ("is there a problem?"). Or he is a complete and irrecuperable idiot. But being an idiot has never been an excuse for being an ass.

 

[hunter001]

I'm with Carrie Moon here. I don't believe one second that he misread the "all inclusive" price to mean that he could bring an extra guest for the same price.

lol. I never said he did. I am sure he did not. I was pointing out something on her website.

 

[Kristy7700]

I bet he knew very well what he was doing, and was probably hoping that once she'll be confronted with the situation, that she would just go along with it rather than have her time wasted and lose the money for the booking, and then played dumb when she was obviously not happy to see the woman in the room ("is there a problem?"). Or he is a complete and irrecuperable idiot. But being an idiot has never been an excuse for being an ass.

I think that was a point

 

[Rockslinger]

I didn't know about your girlfriend.

Is it possible that his girlfriend only wanted to watch?

 

[Carrie Moon]

wow hunter.. over-react much?

rockslinger.. watching usually costs extra.. the point is more likely that the guy wanted to slide one past her. It wouldn't be the first time a guy or female client for that matter tried to slide one past a girl. So many scenarios... ripping off the condom when a girl isn't looking, trying to squeeze an hour out of a two hour session..

I never said I knew what the guy was thinking but after being an escort for 20 years i do know what kinds of things guys can pull... if you thought I was bitching at you Hunter I apologize for my tone. But please stop yelling at me. Carrie out.

 

[genintoronto]

Is it possible that his girlfriend only wanted to watch?

Possible, yes. Still not OK. As it wouldn't be OK either to have his male buddy there "just to watch" without asking her first if she was OK with it.

Any respectful client would have asked BEFORE she showed up if she was OK with entertaining more than one guest.

 

[Carrie Moon]

Then perhaps it could be arranged for squash500 to join one of the ladies as she makes her rounds one evening. He will of course promise to only watch. What one of us could possibly have a problem with that?


Squash, nothing personal, just pulled a name out of my head, nothing is meant by it.

Isn't that called a 'ride along' ?