Is trump hitler reincarnated or hitlers son ?
- Thread starter dirtydaveiii
- Start date
Now do Joe
Christie and Conway have Trumpy boy beat my man. They're food dumpsters.
do you ever get anything right?
George Conway's Stunning Transformation - NewsBreak
In the fast-paced realm of Washington D.C., where politics meets personal narratives, the recent transformation of Trump-bashing lawyer George Conway has c
Of course i do. George will eat everything within arms reachdo you ever get anything right?
George Conway's Stunning Transformation - NewsBreak
In the fast-paced realm of Washington D.C., where politics meets personal narratives, the recent transformation of Trump-bashing lawyer George Conway has coriginal.newsbreak.com
Biden and Trudeau have done way more damage to their country than Trump.
Wrong again, you know they are no longer together, right? Man, do you ever post the facts?
I meant he will eat any food that gets within arms reach bc hes a fat pig, i didnt mean hes currently eating ms conways punanny
Son, the Russia-Trump connection was a proven hoax. The Chinese - Democrat connection is a proven fact.
My refs do not agree with snopes; generally, if something agrees with snopes it’s likely wrong
It is nice to see one part of my education took part in you; Tyrants do use socialism to lure the unthinking into tyranny.
Hoax? Proven hoax? By who? Have you read the Mueller report?
Trump's own words saying he gets his money from the Russians, there were indictments of Russian agents, etc. They
Interacted with known Russian agents. His campaign chair worked for the Russians and gave polling data to aknown russian agent.
The conclusion - Russians helped Trump, he welcomed the help, but they didn't coordinate. Again, read the original report. Not the pundit interpretation. Just because people repeat things ad nauseum doesn't make it true. Taking an ill supported attitude doesnt make it true. That's the nazi technique.
What are you babbling about?
Answered in the other thread.
(And I answered it earlier, but let's go with the more detailed answer.)
The key bit.
*******
If 99% of Americans want him, he gets put back on the ballot by Congress, obviously.
That's the system in place now and as you can see above, I completely agree with that.
Of course, if 99% of Americans wanted him, this would likely not come up - who would bring the complaint in that case?
There is no rule that would stop anyone who had 99% support to be President.
But since the rules already have a backstop, that's fine.
I'm not going to throw out eligibility rules on the basis of the edge case - especially when a way to redress the mistake in an edge case already exists.
Of course, since no President has ever won an election with 65% of the vote, let alone 70%, arguing that rules should be suspended for someone in case he gets 99% is just silly.
I can, but since you wouldn't just say you are making an argument by showing an extreme and therefore saying the rule or any rules like it shouldn't exist, I had to address the possibility that you were arguing that this needs to be considered as a realistic appraisal of the situation.
Especially since you kept moving the number up.
How high does his support have to be to make him exempt from this rule (or all rules?).
Or, as I asked elsewhere, are you arguing that since he could win (regardless of how much he won by) the rules shouldn't apply?
You really probably want to avoid "do you know the definition of words" or "can you not read" arguments given your reading comprehension issues.
Yes, I asked that in post 50.
Asked specifically whether you think there should be no ballot access or qualifcation rules, and given a magic wand to change the Constitution, you came back with asking what if Trump had overwhelming support.
So asked to wave a magic wand to change the Constitution, you are claiming you waved it to create an alternate world where he has that kind of support.
Which is why I have repeatedly asked whether you are trying to argue that since such a world could exist, there should be no such rules or whether such rules should be suspended in such a world.
Last edited:
Jesus 
I knew/know what you’re asking. I read your post.
“if you wave your magic wand, and a large majority ( however you want to word it) want him”…………as you said, he should be on the ballot.
So I answered yours…many times. And now you’ve finally answered mine.
**********
With respect to the present situation, Trump, and the college ( we could probably even include FPtP) we’ve discussed it. It’s past time for electoral reform. I think on that we are agreed.
I knew/know what you’re asking. I read your post.
“if you wave your magic wand, and a large majority ( however you want to word it) want him”…………as you said, he should be on the ballot.
So I answered yours…many times. And now you’ve finally answered mine.
**********
With respect to the present situation, Trump, and the college ( we could probably even include FPtP) we’ve discussed it. It’s past time for electoral reform. I think on that we are agreed.
Last edited:
This links to an article about China, so probably an error.
Can you put the good link in?
What parts of the platform do you find "pretty damn socialist"?
From what I understand, your argument is that the socialist parts were lures used to implement the totalitarian parts and they never actually meant any of them?
No you didn't, since you refused to go into your reasoning and didn't address the Constitutional question at all.Jesus
I knew/know what you’re asking. I read your post.
“if you wave your magic wand, and a large majority ( however you want to word it) want him”…………as you said, he should be on the ballot.
So I answered yours…many times. And now you’ve finally answered mine.
You know this.
And I expect you will continue to refuse to answer the follow up questions I have asked in the other thread.
I doubt very much we are agreed on electoral reform other than "we are past time for some" since there are SO many options for electoral reform.
Given the discussion on this thread, I suspect we disagree about them a great deal.
I’ll have to dig that link up on Google.
I find points 10-21 of the Nazi Party platform pretty man socialist.
*ALL* socialist ideology is meant to lure the lazy and the stupid. There are some indications that the Nazis implemented some of their socialist tenets (Health care and the abolition of private property).
