Can any of you guys give me a lead. I am looking for a tiny girl....say.... 5 feet or so. 120 pounds or under. Basically the smaller the better. PM me if you want.
ISO tiny sp
- Thread starter pigskinguy
- Start date
Miyuko at Ottawa Playgirls, read the reviews and check the site. She has had mixed reviews, I think that I provided a fair assessment of her.
Thanks. With all the negative stuff I've seen, I am a little leary about OPG.laidbackdude said:Miyuko at Ottawa Playgirls, read the reviews and check the site. She has had mixed reviews, I think that I provided a fair assessment of her.
I think that when it comes to OPG, the debate sometimes lack objectivity. In response to your question, Miyuko meets your look criterion.
ANY review of any SP is purely subjective.
A large amount of negative(subjective) reviews, might point to a problem.
However when reading a review you have to seperate the personal preference from bad behaviour.
"I didn't like her face" this is a personal preference or a subjective comment.
"She watched the clock and left early" this is meassurable, in real terms.
My two cents.
A large amount of negative(subjective) reviews, might point to a problem.
However when reading a review you have to seperate the personal preference from bad behaviour.
"I didn't like her face" this is a personal preference or a subjective comment.
"She watched the clock and left early" this is meassurable, in real terms.
My two cents.
angels touch: Rachel a g.f.e
Dont have the time to post a real; review but suface to say this was the beat experence i have had. Rachel wAS very attentive, extermly playfull made for a excellant time, very diffently i will return, mabe even going for a duo. Will post more latter, or just pm me please.
Dont have the time to post a real; review but suface to say this was the beat experence i have had. Rachel wAS very attentive, extermly playfull made for a excellant time, very diffently i will return, mabe even going for a duo. Will post more latter, or just pm me please.
Re: angels touch: Rachel a g.f.e
All his posts has been about Angel's Touch. And this time it's in a thread that's got nothing to do with MPs.
Moderator please?
"theexplorer" sounds a bit fishy.theexplorer said:Dont have the time to post a real; review but suface to say this was the beat experence i have had. Rachel wAS very attentive, extermly playfull made for a excellant time, very diffently i will return, mabe even going for a duo. Will post more latter, or just pm me please.
All his posts has been about Angel's Touch. And this time it's in a thread that's got nothing to do with MPs.
Moderator please?
Pigskinguy asked for tiny girls. He didn't mention MP or SP so, Theexplorer is on topic as far as I can see.
Mods can't check much to know if he's a shill or not. The only thing a mod can do is check the IP address for duplicate under different names and maybe send an email to confirm who the guy is.
His posts do raise an eyebrow because he always relates to Angel's Touch but, maybe it's because it's the only place he ever visited?
The best verification is somebody else's review from the same place/lady with the same conclusion about quality of service. I did find another review mentionning Rachel from Angel's Touch and it was also positive, but with restrictions on the looks.
Anybody else? Mods, can you help?
Mods can't check much to know if he's a shill or not. The only thing a mod can do is check the IP address for duplicate under different names and maybe send an email to confirm who the guy is.
His posts do raise an eyebrow because he always relates to Angel's Touch but, maybe it's because it's the only place he ever visited?
The best verification is somebody else's review from the same place/lady with the same conclusion about quality of service. I did find another review mentionning Rachel from Angel's Touch and it was also positive, but with restrictions on the looks.
Anybody else? Mods, can you help?
...the thread clearly states "in search of ting SP". And all the replies have been on the line of SP.
In any case, can someone verify that Rachel at Angel's is around 5ft and less than 120 lb as requested by the original poster.
Heck, I may have to check her out to verify this...but then I may become a victim of a shill. I have been to Angel's a while back, some older looking woman in a mini skirt saw me (yikes!)....felt like I was doing her a favour by staying. The shower also had no hot water. Decided that I will not repeat after that. Never tried Rachel or whatever handle she goes by on this board.
In any case, can someone verify that Rachel at Angel's is around 5ft and less than 120 lb as requested by the original poster.
Heck, I may have to check her out to verify this...but then I may become a victim of a shill. I have been to Angel's a while back, some older looking woman in a mini skirt saw me (yikes!)....felt like I was doing her a favour by staying. The shower also had no hot water. Decided that I will not repeat after that. Never tried Rachel or whatever handle she goes by on this board.
i've seen rachel a number of times. the reason for my question was that if she now is an sp, i'd make an appointment right away. rachel is close to 5' 3" tall, but i'm pretty sure she's more than 120 pounds, so don't think she meets the original posters requirements. but, i can say i've always had a great time with rachel and would heartily recommend her for a massage. as far as i can tell, with missy gone, she's the only one at angels touch worth seeing. but hey, it could easily be a ymmv thing, but angie was not for me.
