Do you think temporary foreign workers and students would fight in the Canadian army to defend Canada?To defend their country.
Do you think Palestinians are justified to fight to defend their country?
Do you think temporary foreign workers and students would fight in the Canadian army to defend Canada?To defend their country.
You're a moron.You think the US wants to be able to blow people up with their phones and this is a reason to back Israel?
You want the US to become a racial police state too?
2 different questions. The 1.5M people of Russian origin (not Russians), are not temporary workers or students. They are citizens of Israel.Do you think temporary foreign workers and students would fight in the Canadian army to defend Canada?
Do you think Palestinians are justified to fight to defend their country?
Thank you for being one of the few to state that you believe Palestinians have the right to resist the illegal occupation.2 different questions. The 1.5M people of Russian origin (not Russians), are not temporary workers or students. They are citizens of Israel.
Yes, Palestinians have a right to defend their country.
Just to clarify for Geno, is this an unqualified right to do whatever they want whenever they want, or there any limits/restrictions.Yes, Palestinians have a right to defend their country.
Like POS Nation?Just to clarify for Geno, is this an unqualified right to do whatever they want whenever they want, or there any limits/restrictions.
If there was ever a people that deserved a robust and powerful military, it’s the Palestinian people. They have been slaughtered, tortured, degraded and humiliated by Israel for 75 years. Add ethnic cleansing, apartheid and genocide to the list of horrors visited upon them.2 different questions. The 1.5M people of Russian origin (not Russians), are not temporary workers or students. They are citizens of Israel.
Yes, Palestinians have a right to defend their country.
Palestinians could have had all that since 1948 if they were good at politics. Many reasons why that did not happen.If there was ever a people that deserved a robust and powerful military, it’s the Palestinian people. They have been slaughtered, tortured, degraded and humiliated by Israel for 75 years. Add ethnic cleansing, apartheid and genocide to the list of horrors visited upon them.
Limited to defending their territory should anyone attack it. I am not redefining Hamas' actions against civilians on Oct 7 as self defence.Just to clarify for Geno, is this an unqualified right to do whatever they want whenever they want, or there any limits/restrictions.
a bit of a problem seems to be that many of them think that their territory is the entire state of Israel from the river to the seaLimited to defending their territory should anyone attack it. I am not redefining Hamas' actions against civilians on Oct 7 as self defence.
Any non-citizen within Israeli rule should have basic civil rights, barring the right to vote and may be a few others. But do those Palestinians want Israeli citizenship or do they want Palestinian citizenship?There are also 5 million Palestinians refugees waiting for Israel to honour UN resolutions calling for Israel to accept their Right of Return, along with millions of Palestinians living under Israeli rule without citizenship. Should those Palestinians be given the same chance for citizenship?
Debatable, but also immaterial to the situation today.Palestinians could have had all that since 1948 if they were good at politics. Many reasons why that did not happen.
The settlements are illegal per international law and should not have happened. Netanyahu made it worse.Debatable, but also immaterial to the situation today.
Israel could also have heeded their own warnings about not settling for the two decades for the last 5 decades.
Why, they declared they attacked in response to Israeli attacks on the Al Aqsa and settler terrorist attacks.Limited to defending their territory should anyone attack it. I am not redefining Hamas' actions against civilians on Oct 7 as self defence.
Just as the occupation of Palestine has always been the reason their is Palestinian resistance.The settlements are illegal per international law and should not have happened. Netanyahu made it worse.
And you think only zionists are allowed to declare they own the land from river to sea?a bit of a problem seems to be that many of them think that their territory is the entire state of Israel from the river to the sea
That’s the old Ziontology chestnut of victim blaming. But, go ahead, spell out those reasons.Palestinians could have had all that since 1948 if they were good at politics. Many reasons why that did not happen.
How is it self defence when they attacked concert goers or residents of a village who had nothing to do with those attacks?Why, they declared they attacked in response to Israeli attacks on the Al Aqsa and settler terrorist attacks.
Why do you think that can't be self defence?