The issue is that you've said I'm all safe in my armchair.
It's an issue for two reasons (which I've previously stated and you are apparently too thick to understand):
1) You've made an assumption about my "safety". You don't know fuck all about me, but you've made an assumption.
Worse - you've made an assumption hoping that you could use it as a fallacious ad hominem attack. It's a fallacious ad hominem attack because even if I were the greatest coward in the world, it doesn't in any way mean what I've said here in this thread isn't true. You are, with your claims, attacking the person, not the argument. And you're attacking the person, based on assumptions that you perhaps hope are true - but have no actual evidence one way or the other to assume their true. That truly shows your ignorance.
Better yet - you showed yourself to be completely unself-aware. The moment I responded to you with the very same ad hominem right back at you, you took umbrage. Not a good argument, you said. I'm not allowed to make that argument, you think, but you are. Do you see how stupid that is? Can you be that blind?
2) Your claims of service, without substantive supporting evidence - are just that - claims - maybe true maybe false - made by a person clearly more interested in rhetoric than in engaging in debate.
The debate here is Zimbabwe - you apparently think it okay to allow these atrocities to continue. I don't. You hope the issue is my service. It's not. The issue is why you think it's good to allow these atrocities to continue. It really is that simple.
I'm very willing to debate that issue. I can understand the ostrich approach you want to take. I disagree with it - but I understand it. But making assumptions as to what I've done or haven't done is entirely irrelevant.
If I had listed a long list of service to my nation, you'd still not necessarily believe it. It wouldn't impact the discussion of Zimbabwe. You were out of line - completely - in making that comment - it's really the equivalent of a racial slur - attempting to disqualify me based on an assumption you have no evidence of one way or the other. You say you served, but you clearly have no sense of honour.