When Supreme Court appointees who have albatrosses round their necks and are still approved for political purposes and to protect the wrongdoings of certain individuals, well that can be considered to be a Kangaroo Court. We could quite likely see it in the oncoming tax returns case !!
So myou are saying that we should wait for the only impartial judges, those appointed by the Chosen One. Because any Court that ahrees with him is corrct and impartial and any Court that does not is obviously wrong and politically motivated.
It's not a question of "should", it's that we "will" have to wait for SCOTUS on these issues. No one will accept the rulings of a lower court on these political issues involving Trump, regardless of how they are decided. And why should they? SCOTUS has not been deferring to lower courts at all. They appear to understand the danger of letting a single judge who is a political appointee issue the authoritative decision on anything constitutionally significant.
As opposed to letting 5 out 9 Republican political appointee SCOTUS judges, two of whom owe a 'debt to Trump', issue politically biased authoritative decisions masquerading as constitutionally just and thus valid.
This was a jurisdictional issue. It had nothing to do with whether ultimately the Chosen One is correct oin law or not. He chose that court because, and his appointee, he thought he would get a more favorable ruling. It didn't work out that way so it has now become a "political decision". This ruling does not raise any constitutional issues and the SCOTUS does generally take up cases which are merely procedural.
