It still makes rump guilty of sexual assault, which people generally refer to as rape.
Leticia James is a loser!!
- Thread starter mitchell76
- Start date
Infact a judge actually called it rape as I posted the article from WP. Except Skoob who is very delighted that there was a loophole Trump could exploit to not to go to jail. lol.
Last edited:
That's the law.
Don't like it?
Do something to change it.
Otherwise, accept it and move on.
I am no one to accept or not accept the law. I am not even a citizen of that country. However I disagree with it. As does anyone with half a brain.
What no one disagrees with is the fact that Trump is a rapist and a criminal, and he is a rapist and a criminal of his own volition. Nothing to do with the dems, as you alleged.
You asked the reason.
I gave it.
That you want to make up another, hidden, sinister reason is your own BS to sell.
He wasn't tried in criminal court because the statute of limitations didn't allow it.
That's all you actually know.
He's saying a few things.
One is that it isn't rape if it is the right kind of person doing it to the right kind of target.
Second is that - at least for the purposes of this discussion - the only definition that matters is criminal law and guilty verdicts in criminal court specifically using the language of the law.
In other words, he is pretending to be the kind of person who believes that no one has committed rape in Canada since 1983, since no one has been found guilty in criminal court of rape in Canada since then.
How about all the other cases? All of them fall under the statute? Magically years later people come out of the woodwork?
Don't be naive.
We all know this was a total con job and politically motivated. If it was anyone other than someone you didn't already dislike you would say the same thing.
Confirmation bias and the Dems have been totally behind the ongoing campaign for a decade.
Everyone knows this.
I can't speak about all rape cases, but I can speak about this one. It was a sham and politically motivated.
No legitimate rape victim gloats about going shopping with the awarded money like she did. You are being played.
Even if the case went Trump's way, you would still be condemning him so let's not pretend this is anything but confirmation bias.
Why, he did exactly what bragged about doing?
Why didn't you believe him when he bragged about being able to rape women and get away with it?
In the video, Trump tells Bush about a failed attempt to seduce Nancy O'Dell, who was Bush's co-host at the time (circa 2005) of the recording:[16]
Later, referring to Arianne Zucker (whom they were waiting to meet), Trump says:
The fact that Trump forcefully and non-consensually inserted his finger into Caroll is not a sham. Even Trump admits it. He was motivated by him being a lifelong POS. And there is nothing wrong even if charges were brought forth for political reasons - he committed the crime. You should be happy a criminal is getting his day in court.
Just for the sake of being precise, that will no longer be the case starting September 1.
I thought this was quite clear.
For many people this is one of the major things that makes him a hero and someone to support.
It is the perceived "authority" or "strength" or "being bad ass" that appeals to them, as they seem him as a strong leader. Trumpism is an authoritarian ideology after all.
All the other cases of what?
Assault?
Are you convinced there are other cases of assault he should be prosecuted for that he has gotten away with?
No. We don't.
Even more so, since he was found liable in a court of law, as a society -- according to your previous reasoning -- the only thing we do know is that it wasn't a con job.
Or are you now abandoning your position that reality is dictated entirely by court rulings?
Your delusions are your problems, not mine.
Putting "Everyone knows this" after the confirmation bias accusation is chef's kiss.
You think Trump assaulted her for political reasons?
Even I don't think so and I dislike the guy.
Familiar with lots of rape victims are you?
Disturbing.
I'd be condemning him for all kinds of things, yes.
There's a lot to dislike about him besides his admitted propensity for assault.
Are you saying every rape victim needs to walk around with PTSD, and if not, the rapist should not be prosecuted or the victim not taken seriously?
Did the Dems teach or conspire to have Donald "grab 'em by the pussy" before he was even a presidential candidate. Even before the joke of him being a presidential candidate even came to Donald's mind?
Did the Dems and lefties ensure he bought beauty pageants so he could inspect the young girls in the change rooms?
Or did "the Dems" make his daughter so attractive and sexy that Donald said he'd probably be dating her if she wasn't his daughter?
You guys are pretty sick to stand up for and defend any cretin that even says things like that. Unless you're like him and wanna fuck your own daughter too....
You mean no stereotypical weak, powerless rape victim?
Imagine you got groped by your boss, priest, a cop or your uncle and they shoved their dirty fingers up your ass. Then called you a liar over and over when you finally got strong enough or had enough support to fight back against being called a liar.
Fuckig right any normal person would do something audacious to "shove it up HIS ass" when they finally proved him to be the rapist and liar. I'll tell you from experience, it is GREAT to have FUCK YOU money!
If I were her, at her age, I;'d find a way to buy something Trump really values, like Trump Tower, and rename it Chump Tower. Or buy something he really hates and name it for him. Like buy a a house in Palm Beach as close to Mar a Lardo as possible and name it the "Donald Trump Shithole Country Refugee Center" .
Well if "guy talk" is your measure then most people should be in jail right?
Yeah sure....what was she doing with him alone in a dept store change room? Talking politics?
OMFG you have been played.
