Marriage

[Blue-Spheroid]

Another ignorant anti Royals post. Feel free to reread some of the past threads on the Royals when this claim was posted then blown out of the water as not something unusual or unique to the Royals, oooooooooooor feel free to remain ignorant.

So your argument is that the Royals were in-bred (as claimed) but you object to the post because others inbred as well?

Does that mean I can't post a positive review about an SP because other SPs are good also?

 

[Blue-Spheroid]

So you can't adopt kids, or get tax breaks from the govt.

This issue is that these rights are extended to some people and not to others based on sexual orientation; in this country we try to avoid that sort of discrimination.

No one is suggesting that single gays be given rights rights that single straight people don't have.

 

[blackrock13]

So your argument is that the Royals were in-bred (as claimed) but you object to the post because others inbred as well?

Does that mean I can't post a positive review about an SP because other SPs are good also?

To start, not all Royals were inbred. Secondly, it wasn't illegal to marry your cousin, as they didn't know of the risks they were taking. Thirdly, I believe it's been a looooooong time since any Royal married someone who 'was' a cousin. Fourthly with the passing of time the effects of any inbreeding should disappear with modern day social guidelines. So you can't blame Great Great Great Uncle Charlie for your shortcomings. Lastly, you're not posting a positive anything, let alone a review. Aside from that you close.