A woman's right to security of person, to control her own body, is a more fundamental right than the prohibition on discrimination. There are lots of cases where rights come into conflict. The human rights code is important, but in this case trumped by an even more fundamental right.
In fact security of person has already been judged a superior right to another persons right to life! Damn skippy it's superior to the right not to be discriminated against.
No Canadian judge is ever going to order a woman to have sex against her will. That would literally be court ordered rape and it is never going to happen.
Yes, rape. No other word for it.
In fact security of person has already been judged a superior right to another persons right to life! Damn skippy it's superior to the right not to be discriminated against.
No Canadian judge is ever going to order a woman to have sex against her will. That would literally be court ordered rape and it is never going to happen.
Yes, rape. No other word for it.