NYPD chokehold case

GPIDEAL

Prolific User
Jun 27, 2010
23,304
17
38
Unlike the Micheal Brown case, a sharp prosecutor would have a field day with this one. Eric Garner was a physical time bomb, the deadly force used was over the top.

Normally I have respect for the police - but not for pigs. The officer applying the choke hold didn't pay attention to his Judo lessons. You apply a choke hold to make someone submit not perforate his Adam's Apple. Eric Garner died of asphyxiation from a botched choke hold, the pig is guilty of murder.
The New York Pig Department.
 

richaceg

Well-known member
Feb 11, 2009
19,124
9,864
113
So I'm not black, but about 4 months ago I did get detained for suspicion of Grand theft Auto by Toronto PD.

As I was standing outside my car, 5 Toronto PD cars came speeding up to me, (their lights and sirens on) blocking me. Before they got out of their cars, I backed away from my car and just drew my hands up to show that I wasn't holding anything. They asked me why I was trying to steal this car, (they were pointing to my car). When I informed them that this was my car they informed me that they got a call to this address saying that I was trying to steal a car. We were just talking and no one was shouting. After I was able to whip out my ipod and documents showing proof of ownership and registration they went after the person that made the call. THey just needed a few minutes to sort out the information they were provided.
Well for one, you're in Canada. If you were in US...you could've been 6ft under...
 

nuprin001

Member
Sep 12, 2007
924
1
18
- straight armbar takedown
- strike to the common peroneal nerve
- strike to the radial nerve
- hypoglossal pressure point
- clavicle notch pressure point
- infraorbital nerve pressure point
- mandibular angle pressure point
- supra scapular stun
- front wristlock
- kimura
- americana

Shall I continue? All of the aforementioned techniques are taught and approved by virtually every law enforcement use of force curricula for active resistance. Any sort of chokehold that's actually approved by any law enforcement agency is deemed lethal force and can only be utilized if there is an immediate threat of grievous bodily harm or death to the officer or a member of the public.
Very nice. Now, the contention is that 10 seconds of a chokehold was enough to trigger a heart attack. Are you telling me that, with a subject in a condition where a 15 second chokehold (going to give you a little more time) is enough to trigger a heart attack, a kimura wouldn't do the same? A kick to the knee wouldn't? That ANY of those techniques wouldn't trigger a stress heart attack?

I mean, you're the one playing the 20/20 hindsight game, so let's play it. Are you ready to say that none of those would have also resulted in a heart attack in a man who got one from a 10 second chokehold?

I mean, really, a 10 second chokehold triggered a HEART ATTACK in Garner. Not breathing for 10 seconds caused this guy to have a heart attack! So you're saying in his condition, the stress of a kimura wouldn't stop his ticker?
 

frankcastle

Well-known member
Feb 4, 2003
17,864
244
63
Very nice. Now, the contention is that 10 seconds of a chokehold was enough to trigger a heart attack. Are you telling me that, with a subject in a condition where a 15 second chokehold (going to give you a little more time) is enough to trigger a heart attack, a kimura wouldn't do the same? A kick to the knee wouldn't? That ANY of those techniques wouldn't trigger a stress heart attack?

I mean, you're the one playing the 20/20 hindsight game, so let's play it. Are you ready to say that none of those would have also resulted in a heart attack in a man who got one from a 10 second chokehold?

I mean, really, a 10 second chokehold triggered a HEART ATTACK in Garner. Not breathing for 10 seconds caused this guy to have a heart attack! So you're saying in his condition, the stress of a kimura wouldn't stop his ticker?
since most of those others moves don't involve stopping breathing I would say yes most of those wont cause a heart attack..... subduing via pain is very different from subduing bt preventing breathing

the cops escalated the situation..... call for back up and reason with the person..... nothing suggests there was need for a take down

as for resisting..... how many of you go ragdoll when someone is trying to hurt you...... even if you don't want to fight you natural instinct is to react
 

cunning linguist

Well-known member
Oct 13, 2009
1,764
205
63
Very nice. Now, the contention is that 10 seconds of a chokehold was enough to trigger a heart attack. Are you telling me that, with a subject in a condition where a 15 second chokehold (going to give you a little more time) is enough to trigger a heart attack, a kimura wouldn't do the same? A kick to the knee wouldn't? That ANY of those techniques wouldn't trigger a stress heart attack?

I mean, you're the one playing the 20/20 hindsight game, so let's play it. Are you ready to say that none of those would have also resulted in a heart attack in a man who got one from a 10 second chokehold?

I mean, really, a 10 second chokehold triggered a HEART ATTACK in Garner. Not breathing for 10 seconds caused this guy to have a heart attack! So you're saying in his condition, the stress of a kimura wouldn't stop his ticker?
It's less medically likely, but that's beside the point. Let's put it this way, do you feel that the officer would have been justified in pulling his gun in such a situation? A chokehold is considered the same level of force; lethal.
 

nuprin001

Member
Sep 12, 2007
924
1
18
since most of those others moves don't involve stopping breathing I would say yes most of those wont cause a heart attack..... subduing via pain is very different from subduing bt preventing breathing

the cops escalated the situation..... call for back up and reason with the person..... nothing suggests there was need for a take down

as for resisting..... how many of you go ragdoll when someone is trying to hurt you...... even if you don't want to fight you natural instinct is to react
I don't know about you, but assuming I'm in that situation I put my hands behind my back and let the cop put the cuffs on me. I don't "ragdoll" and flop to the ground and I don't start flailing my arms around.

It's less medically likely, but that's beside the point. Let's put it this way, do you feel that the officer would have been justified in pulling his gun in such a situation? A chokehold is considered the same level of force; lethal.
Keeping someone from breathing for 10 seconds is considered lethal force?

I use lethal force on myself every time I get the hiccups?

A chokehold is considered lethal force. When you use it to keep someone breathing until they're dead. Garnder was kept from breathing for about 10 seconds during the arrest, went down, and then had a heart attack in the patrol car.

When you're that damn out of shape that keeping from breathing for 10 seconds will trigger a heart attack, I submit that the pain for any debilitating hold could cause a heart attack. Again, TEN seconds. TEN. It's taking me longer to write this sentence, "It's taking me longer to write this sentence."

Yes, a chokehold can be very, very dangerous, even to a healthy person. If you apply it for long enough. 10 seconds of a chokehold is only dangerous if you're about to drop dead from the pain and stress of stubbing your toe. TEN seconds.
 

destillat

Well-known member
Aug 29, 2001
2,806
68
48
mississauga
I don't know about you, but assuming I'm in that situation I put my hands behind my back and let the cop put the cuffs on me. I don't "ragdoll" and flop to the ground and I don't start flailing my arms around.



Keeping someone from breathing for 10 seconds is considered lethal force?

I use lethal force on myself every time I get the hiccups?

A chokehold is considered lethal force. When you use it to keep someone breathing until they're dead. Garnder was kept from breathing for about 10 seconds during the arrest, went down, and then had a heart attack in the patrol car.

When you're that damn out of shape that keeping from breathing for 10 seconds will trigger a heart attack, I submit that the pain for any debilitating hold could cause a heart attack. Again, TEN seconds. TEN. It's taking me longer to write this sentence, "It's taking me longer to write this sentence."

Yes, a chokehold can be very, very dangerous, even to a healthy person. If you apply it for long enough. 10 seconds of a chokehold is only dangerous if you're about to drop dead from the pain and stress of stubbing your toe. TEN seconds.
So Eric should be punished with death because he was out of shape?
 

sircumsalot69

New member
Jul 18, 2011
211
0
0
Why do dumb asses resist arrest - do they think that's going to work? Cops, the world over, will increase intensity until you comply. I guess they could have tazed him, then we'd be reading about a guy tazed to death.

How fat do you have to be to die from that, seriously?

It's fucking tragic, a guy is dead for no reason, he puts his hands behind his back and he's eating pizza with his kids tonight.
No way the cop should get off scot free!
But yeah, when a bunch of cops say you are under arrest just let them arrest you. Has anyone ever resisted and the cops said "okay, you're right we'll just walk away now..." and it's worked out for them????
 

frankcastle

Well-known member
Feb 4, 2003
17,864
244
63
arguing about a chokehold is missing the point that a cop should descalate a situation especially when we are talking about loose cigs for sale
 

ZenSouljah

New member
Aug 26, 2005
542
0
0
I doubt the chokehold caused the heart attack, more probably from compression of his chest when he was on the ground with the cops on top of him. That and the underlying medical conditions, chance are had he been in better shape/health he would have been okay like most people who go through that.
 

nuprin001

Member
Sep 12, 2007
924
1
18
So Eric should be punished with death because he was out of shape?
With respect to death of your close friend Eric, of course not. But that's a silly, emotional straw man argument that's been made time and time again and serves no purpose other than to short circuit logical discussion of the topic at hand.

Nobody wanted your friend Eric dead. His death was a tragic result of his decisions, however. His death was the tragic result of repeated bad decisions on his part. He chose to commit a crime. A small, relatively harmless crime, but a crime. He chose not to pay the citations for that crime. The was arrested for that crime, and several others. He did not learn from that experience. He continued to commit the same crime. He continued to not pay the fines for that crime. His continued lack of payment on fines for a petty crime resulted in an arrest warrant. He chose not to submit to the arrest. He fought back during the arrest. He was in terrible physical condition, should have submitted to the arrest peacefully (especially after a previous charge of resisting arrest), but chose not to do so.

He made mistake after mistake after bad choice after bad choice. And tragically died because of that chain of events. And I'm not even including the choice to be in bad shape while living a life of (very petty) crime.

It isn't about selling cigarettes. It's about resisting arrest. That's the common theme in each of these cases. Give me an example where the cops killed someone who was cooperating with them, and we've got a serious problem. Give me a case where the cops had a realistic option of lesser force and purposely chose greater force, and I'm all for putting that cop behind bars. Cops torturing suspects with toilet plungers? Throw 'em in prison and lose the damn keys. But that's not what we have here, is it? It's a guy who chose to resist arrest and died as a result of the cop choking him for 10 seconds?

I mean, none of you has had a girl choke you for a heck of a lot longer than that? Don't do it with someone you don't know and trust, but 10 seconds of choking is a joke. Unless you're in that bad of shape, I guess.
 

Insidious Von

My head is my home
Sep 12, 2007
42,743
9,332
113
Yes a ten second choke hold improperly applied can result in death. Eric Garner was a physical wreck, his heart was probably clogged with cholesterol and fat lipids. When he couldn't breathe he probably had a panic attack which brought on cardiac arrest. A slam dunk case for any prosecutor.

And again, the choke hold used was to kill not to make him submit.
 

destillat

Well-known member
Aug 29, 2001
2,806
68
48
mississauga
With respect to death of your close friend Eric, of course not. But that's a silly, emotional straw man argument that's been made time and time again and serves no purpose other than to short circuit logical discussion of the topic at hand.

Nobody wanted your friend Eric dead. His death was a tragic result of his decisions, however. His death was the tragic result of repeated bad decisions on his part. He chose to commit a crime. A small, relatively harmless crime, but a crime. He chose not to pay the citations for that crime. The was arrested for that crime, and several others. He did not learn from that experience. He continued to commit the same crime. He continued to not pay the fines for that crime. His continued lack of payment on fines for a petty crime resulted in an arrest warrant. He chose not to submit to the arrest. He fought back during the arrest. He was in terrible physical condition, should have submitted to the arrest peacefully (especially after a previous charge of resisting arrest), but chose not to do so.

He made mistake after mistake after bad choice after bad choice. And tragically died because of that chain of events. And I'm not even including the choice to be in bad shape while living a life of (very petty) crime.

It isn't about selling cigarettes. It's about resisting arrest. That's the common theme in each of these cases. Give me an example where the cops killed someone who was cooperating with them, and we've got a serious problem. Give me a case where the cops had a realistic option of lesser force and purposely chose greater force, and I'm all for putting that cop behind bars. Cops torturing suspects with toilet plungers? Throw 'em in prison and lose the damn keys. But that's not what we have here, is it? It's a guy who chose to resist arrest and died as a result of the cop choking him for 10 seconds?

I mean, none of you has had a girl choke you for a heck of a lot longer than that? Don't do it with someone you don't know and trust, but 10 seconds of choking is a joke. Unless you're in that bad of shape, I guess.
Your blabbering aside... he was a PETTY CRIMINAL. Does THAT make him deserving of death?

Also, to refute your blind insistence... he was NOT UNDER ARREST. Police officers cannot just walk up to you and try to grab your wrists. Did you watch a different video than everyone else did? Do you have a link to a video where the police AT ANY TIME uttered the words "you are under arrest"??
Yeah... didn't think so.
 

Aardvark154

New member
Jan 19, 2006
53,744
3
0
Selling loose cigarettes. Does anybody know what that means?

It means he was selling individual cigarettes. Not packs, not cases. Individual cigarettes. He was going to get rich!

Cops like those who strong-armed Eric are a waste of tax dollars and fresh air.
Yes, but this was not some rogue officer or group of officers. The de Blasio Administration said to the NYPD we want you to enforce this.
 

Smallcock

Active member
Jun 5, 2009
13,648
21
38
The ban on chokeholds doesn't state that an officer can perform a chokehold but only for less than 10 seconds. The reason why it doesn't say that is because it's understood that a chokehold for any length of time whether 1 second or 10 seconds can cause serious harm. A chokehold has the potential to break a persons neck and kill them in less than ten seconds.

Eric's suspected infraction leading up to the de facto arrest is significant. His suspected petty nonviolent crime isn't worth the ink used to report it. The officers were obligated to state the charge against him, and tell him clearly that he was being placed under arrest. Hands flailing, the cops were obligated to attempt to de-escalate the situation. Cops are trained tax paid professionals with a job to serve and protect the public.

The cops failed on all counts.
 

Smallcock

Active member
Jun 5, 2009
13,648
21
38
I doubt the chokehold caused the heart attack, more probably from compression of his chest when he was on the ground with the cops on top of him. That and the underlying medical conditions, chance are had he been in better shape/health he would have been okay like most people who go through that.
Healthy people have died while on the ground with cops putting their full body weight on them causing them to suffocate.

The actions of these cops is something we've seen many times before.
 

Smallcock

Active member
Jun 5, 2009
13,648
21
38
Yes, but this was not some rogue officer or group of officers. The de Blasio Administration said to the NYPD we want you to enforce this.

Fair enough, however there is a right way and a wrong way to enforce it.
 

cunning linguist

Well-known member
Oct 13, 2009
1,764
205
63
I don't know about you, but assuming I'm in that situation I put my hands behind my back and let the cop put the cuffs on me. I don't "ragdoll" and flop to the ground and I don't start flailing my arms around.



Keeping someone from breathing for 10 seconds is considered lethal force?Q
Now you're getting it.

I use lethal force on myself every time I get the hiccups?
What you do in the privacy of your own home is your own business. But any use of force training that actually allows chokeholds, classifies them as lethal force.

A chokehold is considered lethal force.
Period, so a cop better be fearing the life of another before they decide to utilize it and they better be prepared to justify it, much in the same way they can't just pull a gun for no good reason.
 
Toronto Escorts