ONCE C-36 is Law ..... Where will you Guys prefer INCALL?? HOTEL OR CONDO ?

[GPIDEAL]

If they try that in Canada the case may be dismissed on grounds of illegal arrest, even if the SP testifies against you that you had sex & paid for it. Compare this case where the guy got off not guilty:

http://www.cannabisculture.com/articles/5161.html
http://www.canada.com/saskatoonstarphoenix/story.html?id=157c77e4-9d4c-47c1-bc41-39000752dbd3

"More is required than proof that the accused is probably guilty. A jury which concludes only that the accused is probably guilty must acquit...."

"The Supreme Court of Canada has since emphasized in R. v. Starr[7] that an effective way to explain the concept is to tell the jury that proof beyond a reasonable doubt "falls much closer to absolute certainty than to proof on a balance of probabilities." It is not enough to believe that the accused is probably guilty, or likely guilty. Proof of probable guilt, or likely guilt, is not proof beyond a reasonable doubt.[8]"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reasonable_Doubt

If an SP testifies against you like you say, that alone might not be enough, but if she has your phone call or text message confirming a transaction, you're cooked.

If a jury thinks that there's reasonable doubt*, you're finished, unless an honest and competent judge intercedes. Otherwise, your lawyer might have to appeal.

*There's no checklist. There could be errors in judgement, bad counsel, that might persuade a jury to convict.


P.S. BTW, thanks for the reference source. It's good too, to explain the concept in layman's terms.

 

[canada-man]

what about San Francisco the most liberal city in the U.S? what is their enforcement like?

 

[Toronto`s Finest]

Most u.s. cities .... very liberal .... not enforcing other than seedy hotel areas & street issues

 

[aznlover]

Why is the U.S. better?

Service in many parts of the states is worse than Canada... girls charge a premium and offer relatively mediocre service.

Most u.s. cities .... very liberal .... not enforcing other than seedy hotel areas & street issues

Still doesn't compare to Toronto/Montreal/Vancouver; hopefully C36 doesn't change too much.

 

[Veronica27]

Where is none of the above. No more incalls or outcalls in condos, hotels, or home for me. The End.

I will be back in strip joints and foreign countries.

A John that will call it what it was, the good old days.

P.S. There is a lot of bravado here. Will see reality when the law is enforced. I almost got scooped up in the York raid at Delux. Yes, I would have got off. But I would shitted bricks in the cop car. And there would have been a lot of explainin to do if actual name was published.

 

[ackileez]

I really though governments were supposed to be secular.

People should be allowed to do whatever they want as long as they're not hurting anyone.

Thats another problem when you allow certain immigrant populations, who carry with them strict unforgiving draconian religious backgrounds.

When Nazi Mackay, spews his BS. Free thinking,liberal minded people, unhindered by relgious doctrine call out the bullshit.

Peoples brought here with the intent of keeping thier oppressive religious beliefs is poison.

Ask anyone with a free mind about bill C 36, after a read.
Now ask someone with a religious belief.
Difference :
One group already made up thier minds before reading.

My point isn't that some immigrants are bad,no.
Its that religion is wrong for human rights, and that some people hail from unlucky places who still suffer the curse of religion.

 

[Eddie401]

Just stumbled over this. And how does everyone feel about hotels vs condos (the original topic for the folks that clearly forgot or just don't care) 9 months later?